World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 92 690 376 153 49108

David Cosman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Cosman between 1981 and 2014, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Cosman published across 34 years, from 1981 to 2014, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 1990. 2 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2014. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 1990. 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication
1981 2014

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Cosman: publications per year, 1981 to 2014
Year Publications
1981 2
1982 3
1983 1
1984 1
1985 3
1986 5
1987 7
1988 10
1989 8
1990 15
1991 10
1992 8
1993 3
1994 6
1995 10
1996 5
1997 8
1998 3
1999 9
2000 2
2001 5
2002 4
2003 9
2004 4
2005 6
2006 7
2007 4
2008 2
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 1
2014 1
Total 163
Download as CSV

David Cosman publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Cosman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 147–156 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 153 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146 153
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

David Cosman D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Cosman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51 92
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

David Cosman is affiliated with Amgen in the United States. Their professional activities are primarily based there, reflecting a career connected to this major biotechnology company.

Currently, there is no publicly available information on recent papers authored by David Cosman, including details such as titles, years of publication, and venues. Similarly, there are no records of frequent co-authors or repeated collaboration patterns in the scientific literature.

The scientific fields and subfields associated with David Cosman's work have not been documented in accessible sources. This includes a lack of information on main topics of research or specialized areas of study.

There is no available data related to book publications or contributions to scientific literature in book form under Cosman's name. Likewise, no frequent publication venues have been identified for this researcher.

No records of awards or distinctions have been found for David Cosman, nor is there any indication of the researcher being deceased.

Best Publications

  • A homologue of the TNF receptor and its ligand enhance T-cell growth and dendritic-cell function

    Dirk M. Anderson;Eugene Maraskovsky;William L. Billingsley;William C. Dougall

  • Cloning, sequence and expression of two distinct human interleukin-1 complementary DNAs

    Carl J. March;Bruce Mosley;Alf Larsen;Douglas Pat Cerretti

  • ULBPs, Novel MHC Class I–Related Molecules, Bind to CMV Glycoprotein UL16 and Stimulate NK Cytotoxicity through the NKG2D Receptor

    David Cosman;Jürgen Müllberg;Claire L. Sutherland;Wilson Chin

  • RANK is essential for osteoclast and lymph node development.

    W C Dougall;M Glaccum;K Charrier;K Rohrbach

  • Utilization of the beta and gamma chains of the IL-2 receptor by the novel cytokine IL-15.

    J G Giri;M Ahdieh;J Eisenman;K Shanebeck

  • A receptor for tumor necrosis factor defines an unusual family of cellular and viral proteins

    CA Smith;T Davis;D Anderson;L Solam

  • Molecular and biological characterization of a murine ligand for CD40

    Richard J. Armitage;William C. Fanslow;Laura Strockbine;Timothy A. Sato

  • The IL-6 signal transducer, gp130: an oncostatin M receptor and affinity converter for the LIF receptor

    David P. Gearing;Michael R. Comeau;Della J. Friend;Steven D. Gimpel

  • cDNA expression cloning of the IL-1 receptor, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily

    J E Sims;C J March;D Cosman;M B Widmer

  • Identification of a ligand for the c-kit proto-oncogene.

    Douglas E. Williams;June Eisenman;Allison Baird;Charles Rauch

  • Molecular cloning of mast cell growth factor, a hematopoietin that is active in both membrane bound and soluble forms.

    Dirk M. Anderson;Stewart D. Lyman;Allison Baird;Janis M. Wignall

  • Stimulation of B-cell progenitors by cloned murine interleukin-7.

    Anthony E. Namen;Stephen Lupton;Kathryn Hjerrild;Janis Wignall

  • A novel IL-1 receptor, cloned from B cells by mammalian expression, is expressed in many cell types.

    C.J. McMahan;J.L. Slack;B. Mosley;D. Cosman

  • A novel immunoglobulin superfamily receptor for cellular and viral MHC class I molecules

    David Cosman;Neil Fanger;Luis Borges;Marek Kubin

  • c-Mpl ligand is a humoral regulator of megakaryocytopoiesis

    Françoise Wendling;Eugene Maraskovsky;Najet Debili;Christina Florindo

  • The murine interleukin-4 receptor: Molecular cloning and characterization of secreted and membrane bound forms

    Bruce Mosley;M.Patricia Beckmann;Carl J. March;Rejean L. Idzerda

  • Identification and cloning of a novel IL-15 binding protein that is structurally related to the alpha chain of the IL-2 receptor.

    J. G. Giri;S. Kumaki;M. Ahdieh;D. J. Friend

  • Mast cell growth factor maps near the steel locus on mouse chromosome 10 and is deleted in a number of steel alleles.

    Neal G. Copeland;Debra J. Gilbert;Brian C. Cho;Peter J. Donovan

  • Leukemia inhibitory factor receptor is structurally related to the IL-6 signal transducer, gp130.

    D.P. Gearing;C.J. Thut;T. VandeBos;S.D. Gimpel

  • Cloning of the human and murine interleukin-7 receptors: Demonstration of a soluble form and homology to a new receptor superfamily

    Raymond G. Goodwin;Della Friend;Steven F. Ziegler;Rita Jerzy

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk M. Anderson
Dirk M. Anderson Washington University in St. Louis
Carl J. March
Carl J. March Amgen (United States)
Steven Gillis
Steven Gillis Dartmouth College
Douglas Pat Cerretti
Douglas Pat Cerretti Amgen (United States)
Kenneth H. Grabstein
Kenneth H. Grabstein Corixa Corporation
Douglas E. Williams
Douglas E. Williams Codiak BioSciences
Paul J. Conlon
Paul J. Conlon Bioduro-Sundia
Nancy A. Jenkins
Nancy A. Jenkins The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Charles R. Maliszewski
Charles R. Maliszewski Amgen (United States)
Neal G. Copeland
Neal G. Copeland The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When planning a career in molecular biology, exploring related online degrees and educational pathways can broaden your opportunities. For those interested in the intersection of healthcare and molecular science, bsn to msn programs online provide registered nurses with advanced clinical and leadership skills, opening doors to specialized roles.

Choosing the right institution is equally important. Many students seek out a non profit university for its focus on academic quality and student support over profit motives. These institutions often invest more in faculty and research, benefitting those pursuing scientific disciplines like molecular biology.

For active-duty military and veterans, selecting one of the military friendly online schools can ensure flexibility, tailored support services, and recognition of military experience. This is valuable for those balancing service with career advancement in scientific fields.

Finally, students interested in applying their biology knowledge to help communities might consider an online masters in social work. This pathway combines science with direct impact on public health, mental wellness, and social outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing David Cosman

Recently Published Articles