World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics and Molecular Biology
France
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 74 1242 38 221 16974

Chantal Ehresmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chantal Ehresmann between 1970 and 2014, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chantal Ehresmann published across 45 years, from 1970 to 2014, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2000. 1 of the 235 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2014. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2000. 1970: 5 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 6 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 4 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication
1970 2014

235 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chantal Ehresmann: publications per year, 1970 to 2014
Year Publications
1970 5
1971 2
1972 3
1973 0
1974 4
1975 6
1976 1
1977 4
1978 2
1979 1
1980 2
1981 5
1982 0
1983 3
1984 2
1985 2
1986 3
1987 6
1988 7
1989 8
1990 12
1991 7
1992 4
1993 12
1994 8
1995 7
1996 17
1997 7
1998 11
1999 9
2000 19
2001 18
2002 10
2003 9
2004 7
2005 4
2006 2
2007 2
2008 2
2009 0
2010 1
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 1
Total 235
Download as CSV

Chantal Ehresmann publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chantal Ehresmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 217–226 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 221 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98 221
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Chantal Ehresmann D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chantal Ehresmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89 74
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in France Leader Award

Overview

Chantal Ehresmann is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their academic profile reflects a professional connection with this prominent national research institution.

Although no specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues are listed, the association with CNRS indicates involvement in a research environment known for multidisciplinary and advanced scientific contributions.

Details on main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work are not provided. Similarly, there is no information about book publications or awards received, which limits a detailed mapping of their specific research focus or recognition.

The available data does not include recent publications or citation metrics that would offer insight into the impact or thematic trends in their scientific output.

This profile reflects the limited publicly available information on Chantal Ehresmann's research contributions and collaborations, highlighting only institutional affiliation as a key element of their scientific career.

Best Publications

  • Probing the structure of RNAs in solution

    Chantal Ehresmann;Florence Baudin;Maryléne Mougel;Pascale Romby

  • The fragile X mental retardation protein binds specifically to its mRNA via a purine quartet motif.

    Céline Schaeffer;Barbara Bardoni;Jean‐Louis Mandel;Bernard Ehresmann

  • Identification of the primary site of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA dimerization in vitro

    Eugene Skripkin;Jean-Christophe Paillart;Roland Marquet;Bernard Ehresmann

  • Staphylococcus aureus RNAIII and the endoribonuclease III coordinately regulate spa gene expression

    Eric Huntzinger;Sandrine Boisset;Cosmin Saveanu;Yvonne Benito

  • Functional Sites in the 5′ Region of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 RNA Form Defined Structural Domains

    Florence Baudin;Roland Marquet;Catherine Isel;Jean-Luc Darlix

  • The structure of threonyl-tRNA synthetase-tRNA(Thr) complex enlightens its repressor activity and reveals an essential zinc ion in the active site.

    Rajan Sankaranarayanan;Anne-Catherine Dock-Bregeon;Pascale Romby;Joel Caillet

  • A loop-loop "kissing" complex is the essential part of the dimer linkage of genomic HIV-1 RNA.

    Jean-Christophe Paillart;Eugene Skripkin;Bernard Ehresmann;Chantal Ehresmann

  • Initiation of Reverse Transcripion of HIV-1: Secondary Structure of the HIV-1 RNA/tRNA|rlmbopopnbop|Lys|clobop|3 (Template/Primer) Complex

    Catherine Isel;Chantal Ehresmann;Gérard Keith;Bernard Ehresmann

  • tRNAs as primer of reverse transcriptases.

    R. Marquet;C. Isel;C. Ehresmann;B. Ehresmann

  • Crystal structures of coaxially stacked kissing complexes of the HIV-1 RNA dimerization initiation site.

    Eric Ennifar;Philippe Walter;Bernard Ehresmann;Chantal Ehresmann

  • Modified nucleotides of tRNA(3Lys) modulate primer/template loop-loop interaction in the initiation complex of HIV-1 reverse transcription.

    C Isel;R Marquet;G Keith;C Ehresmann

  • Mutational analysis of the bipartite dimer linkage structure of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomic RNA.

    J C Paillart;R Marquet;E Skripkin;B Ehresmann

  • Dimerization of human immunodeficiency virus (type 1) RNA: stimulation by cations and possible mechanism

    Roland Marquet;Florence Baudin;Caroline Gabus;Jean-Luc Darlix

  • Specific initiation and switch to elongation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcription require the post-transcriptional modifications of primer tRNA3Lys.

    C. Isel;J. M. Lanchy;S. F. Le Grice;C. Ehresmann

  • Transfer RNA-mediated editing in threonyl-tRNA synthetase. The class II solution to the double discrimination problem.

    Anne-Catherine Dock-Bregeon;Rajan Sankaranarayanan;Pascale Romby;Joel Caillet

  • A dual role of the putative RNA dimerization initiation site of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in genomic RNA packaging and proviral DNA synthesis.

    J C Paillart;L Berthoux;M Ottmann;J L Darlix

  • The Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Polyprotein Has Nucleic Acid Chaperone Activity: Possible Role in Dimerization of Genomic RNA and Placement of tRNA on the Primer Binding Site

    Ya-Xiong Feng;Stephen Campbell;Demetria Harvin;Bernard Ehresmann

  • The crystal structure of the dimerization initiation site of genomic HIV-1 RNA reveals an extended duplex with two adenine bulges

    E Ennifar;M Yusupov;P Walter;R Marquet

  • A General Secondary‐Structure Model for Procaryotic and Eucaryotic RNAs of the Small Ribosomal Subunits

    Patrick Stiegler;Philippe Carbon;Jean-Pierre Ebel;Chantal Ehresmann

  • The crystal structure of UUCG tetraloop.

    E Ennifar;A Nikulin;S Tishchenko;A Serganov

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernard Ehresmann
Bernard Ehresmann Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Roland Marquet
Roland Marquet University of Strasbourg
Pascale Romby
Pascale Romby Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Pierre Ebel
Jean-Pierre Ebel Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Eric Westhof
Eric Westhof University of Strasbourg
Marianne Grunberg-Manago
Marianne Grunberg-Manago Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Gérard Keith
Gérard Keith Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Dino Moras
Dino Moras Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
Richard Giegé
Richard Giegé Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Christiane Branlant
Christiane Branlant University of Lorraine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Molecular Biology often sparks interest in related fields. For students considering interdisciplinary paths or flexible study options, a growing number of online programs are available. If you’re seeking affordability while advancing your education, exploring the most affordable online master's in education can offer you valuable insights into cost-effective graduate studies.

Fields such as library science and speech-language pathology are frequently chosen as complementary or alternative career options for those with a background in molecular or biological sciences. If you’re interested in information management or scientific resources, understanding the average cost of mlis degree us is crucial for budgeting your academic journey.

For careers in healthcare, particularly communication disorders, exploring accredited speech pathology programs is essential to ensure professional recognition. Additionally, those switching fields can benefit from slp bridge programs to gain necessary credentials efficiently.

Exploring these related online degrees and recognized pathways can open diverse professional opportunities for students in the molecular sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Chantal Ehresmann

Recently Published Articles