World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Molecular Biology
France
2026
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
France
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 111 358 327 3 2 396 43833
Biology and Biochemistry 114 834 741 16 16 539 47233

Dino Moras publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dino Moras between 1968 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dino Moras published across 58 years, from 1968 to 2025, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2000. 1 of the 583 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2000. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 2 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 9 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 16 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 18 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 21 publications 1999: 30 publications 2000: 58 publications 2001: 23 publications 2002: 22 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 25 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 5 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1968 2025

583 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dino Moras: publications per year, 1968 to 2025
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 1
1970 1
1971 2
1972 0
1973 1
1974 2
1975 2
1976 2
1977 2
1978 1
1979 2
1980 4
1981 2
1982 4
1983 5
1984 9
1985 8
1986 10
1987 16
1988 6
1989 6
1990 8
1991 6
1992 10
1993 18
1994 9
1995 13
1996 15
1997 17
1998 21
1999 30
2000 58
2001 23
2002 22
2003 18
2004 23
2005 20
2006 25
2007 26
2008 22
2009 20
2010 21
2011 11
2012 18
2013 8
2014 8
2015 7
2016 1
2017 3
2018 2
2019 3
2020 1
2021 2
2022 1
2023 5
2024 0
2025 1
Total 583
Download as CSV

Dino Moras publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dino Moras sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 387–396 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 396 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24 396
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Dino Moras D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dino Moras sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38 111
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Molecular Biology in France Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in France Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in France Leader Award
  • 2003 - Member of the European Academy of Sciences
  • 1999 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1998 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Dino Moras is affiliated with the Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology in France. Their research primarily spans the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology with a focus on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism as subfields.

Their work addresses a range of topics including:

  • Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Cancer-related gene regulation
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Some of the recent papers authored include:

  • "Correlation between equi-partition of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and amino-acid biosynthesis pathways," 2020, Nucleic Acids Research
  • "Structural insights into the HNF4 biology," 2023, Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • "Nonsteroidal ecdysone receptor agonists use a water channel for binding to the ecdysone receptor complex EcR/USP," 2021, Journal of Pesticide Science
  • "A novel nuclear receptor subfamily enlightens the origin of heterodimerization," 2022, BMC Biology
  • "A structural signature motif enlightens the origin and diversification of nuclear receptors," 2021, PLoS Genetics

The scientist has frequently collaborated with several coauthors, including:

  • Isabelle M. L. Billas
  • Gabriel V. Markov
  • Vincent Laudet
  • Alastair G. McEwen
  • Abdul Kareem Mohideen Patel

Publishing venues where their work appears include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Journal of Pesticide Science
  • BMC Biology

Best Publications

  • Chemical and biological evolution of nucleotide-binding protein.

    Michael G. Rossmann;Dino Moras;Kenneth W. Olsen

  • Partition of tRNA synthetases into two classes based on mutually exclusive sets of sequence motifs

    Gilbert Eriani;Marc Delarue;Olivier Poch;Jean Gangloff

  • Crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain of the human nuclear receptor RXR-alpha.

    William Bourguet;Marc Ruff;Pierre Chambon;Hinrich Gronemeyer

  • Crystal structure of the RAR-gamma ligand-binding domain bound to all-trans retinoic acid.

    Jean-Paul Renaud;Natacha Rochel;Marc Ruff;Valéria Vivat

  • A canonical structure for the ligand-binding domain of nuclear receptors.

    Jean Marie Wurtz;William Bourguet;Jean Paul Renaud;Valerie Vivat

  • Spontaneous assembly of double-stranded helicates from oligobipyridine ligands and copper(I) cations: structure of an inorganic double helix

    Jean-Marie Lehn;Annie Rigault;Jay Siegel;Jack Harrowfield

  • THE NUCLEAR RECEPTOR LIGAND-BINDING DOMAIN : STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION

    Dino Moras;Hinrich Gronemeyer

  • The Crystal Structure of the Nuclear Receptor for Vitamin D Bound to Its Natural Ligand

    N. Rochel;J.M. Wurtz;A. Mitschler;B. Klaholz

  • An attempt to unify the structure of polymerases

    Marc Delarue;Olivier Poch;Noel Tordo;Dino Moras

  • Class II aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetases: crystal structure of yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase complexed with tRNA(Asp)

    M Ruff;S Krishnaswamy;M Boeglin;A Poterszman

  • Transmembrane signaling across the ligand-gated FhuA receptor: crystal structures of free and ferrichrome-bound states reveal allosteric changes.

    Kaspar P Locher;Bernard Rees;Ralf Koebnik;André Mitschler

  • Correlation between segmental mobility and the location of antigenic determinants in proteins

    E. Westhof;D. Altschuh;D. Moras;A. C. Bloomer

  • Crystallographic refinement of yeast aspartic acid transfer RNA.

    E. Westhof;P. Dumas;D. Moras

  • An operational RNA code for amino acids and possible relationship to genetic code.

    Paul Schimmel;Richard Giege;Dino Moras;Shigeyuki Yokoyama

  • Crystal structure of a heterodimeric complex of RAR and RXR ligand-binding domains.

    William Bourguet;Valérie Vivat;Jean-Marie Wurtz;Pierre Chambon

  • Structural and functional considerations of the aminoacylation reaction

    John G. Arnez;Dino Moras

  • Crystal structure of the human RXRα ligand-binding domain bound to its natural ligand: 9-cis retinoic acid

    Pascal F. Egea;André Mitschler;Natacha Rochel;Marc Ruff

  • Comparative analysis of ribosomal proteins in complete genomes: an example of reductive evolution at the domain scale

    Odile Lecompte;Raymond Ripp;Jean‐Claude Thierry;Dino Moras

  • Studies of asymmetry in the three-dimensional structure of lobster D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

    D Moras;KW Olsen;MN Sabesan;M Buehner

  • Crystal structure of yeast tRNAAsp.

    D Moras;M B Comarmond;J Fischer;R Weiss

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Giegé
Richard Giegé Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Andre Mitschler
Andre Mitschler University of Strasbourg
Eric Westhof
Eric Westhof University of Strasbourg
Olivier Poch
Olivier Poch University of Strasbourg
Hinrich Gronemeyer
Hinrich Gronemeyer Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
William Bourguet
William Bourguet University of Montpellier
Patrick Schultz
Patrick Schultz Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
Pierre Chambon
Pierre Chambon Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
Pascale Romby
Pascale Romby Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Pierre Ebel
Jean-Pierre Ebel Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Biology or Biochemistry in the USA, there are various related online degree options that cater to diverse career goals within the life sciences and healthcare fields. Online learning now makes it easier to balance study with work and other commitments, while accessing quality programs nationwide.

For those drawn to healthcare, an online ASN program is a practical starting point, allowing you to earn an associate degree in nursing and pursue licensure. If nutrition and wellness are of interest, earning a nutritionist degree online can prepare you for work as a nutritionist or dietitian.

Management roles in healthcare are also attainable through advanced study. You can explore the number of cahme accredited mha programs online to gain expertise in healthcare administration. Experienced nurses seeking to advance their practice may consider a doctor of nursing practice degree without clinical requirements.

Each of these flexible online pathways opens doors to fulfilling careers, supporting ongoing learning in biology, clinical practice, and healthcare leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Dino Moras

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles