World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lawrence Kleiman

Lawrence Kleiman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 55 3890 3572 116 107 123 8339

Lawrence Kleiman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lawrence Kleiman between 1971 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lawrence Kleiman published across 46 years, from 1971 to 2016, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1997. 4 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1997. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 1 publication
1971 2016

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lawrence Kleiman: publications per year, 1971 to 2016
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 2
1977 3
1978 2
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 3
1992 2
1993 3
1994 7
1995 1
1996 5
1997 9
1998 4
1999 5
2000 3
2001 3
2002 9
2003 6
2004 9
2005 3
2006 3
2007 4
2008 4
2009 3
2010 2
2011 2
2012 4
2013 3
2014 7
2015 3
2016 1
Total 124
Download as CSV

Lawrence Kleiman publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence Kleiman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 115–124 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 123 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235 123
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Lawrence Kleiman D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence Kleiman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134 55
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Lawrence Kleiman is affiliated with McGill University in Canada. Their academic profile focuses on research conducted within this institution.

Details of their recent publications, including specific paper titles, years, and publication venues, are not available. Likewise, information on frequent co-authors, publication venues they regularly submit to, and book publications has not been provided.

Information regarding their main fields of study, subfields of study, and primary research topics is not included in the available data.

No records of awards or honors received by Lawrence Kleiman are indicated.

Best Publications

  • Requirement of DDX3 DEAD Box RNA Helicase for HIV-1 Rev-RRE Export Function

    Venkat S.R.K. Yedavalli;Christine Neuveut;Ya-hui Chi;Lawrence Kleiman

  • The interaction between HIV-1 Gag and APOBEC3G.

    Shan Cen;Fei Guo;Meijuan Niu;Jenan Saadatmand

  • Primer tRNAs for Reverse Transcription

    Johnson Mak;Lawrence Kleiman

  • Identification of tRNAs incorporated into wild-type and mutant human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

    Min Jiang;Johnson Mak;Azim Ladha;Eric Cohen

  • Inhibition of -Primed Reverse Transcription by Human APOBEC3G during Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Replication

    Fei Guo;Shan Cen;Meijuan Niu;Jenan Saadatmand

  • Role of Pr160gag-pol in mediating the selective incorporation of tRNA(Lys) into human immunodeficiency virus type 1 particles.

    Johnson Mak;Min Jiang;Mark A. Wainberg;Marie-Louise Hammarskjöld

  • APOBEC3G inhibits DNA strand transfer during HIV-1 reverse transcription.

    Xiao-Yu Li;Fei Guo;Li Zhang;Lawrence Kleiman;Lawrence Kleiman

  • Mutations in the kissing-loop hairpin of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reduce viral infectivity as well as genomic RNA packaging and dimerization.

    Michael Laughrea;Louis Jette;Johnson Mak;Lawrence Kleiman

  • Incorporation of lysyl-tRNA synthetase into human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

    Shan Cen;Ahmad Khorchid;Hassan Javanbakht;Juliana Gabor;Juliana Gabor

  • In Vitro Characterization of the Interaction between HIV-1 Gag and Human Lysyl-tRNA Synthetase

    Brandie J. Kovaleski;Robert Kennedy;Minh K. Hong;Siddhartha A. Datta

  • Association of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vif with RNA and its role in reverse transcription.

    Markus Dettenhofer;Shan Cen;Bradley A. Carlson;Lawrence Kleiman;Lawrence Kleiman

  • Human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 nucleocapsid protein (NCp7) directs specific initiation of minus-strand DNA synthesis primed by human tRNA(Lys3) in vitro: studies of viral RNA molecules mutated in regions that flank the primer binding site.

    X Li;Y Quan;E J Arts;Z Li

  • Comparison of deoxyoligonucleotide and tRNA(Lys-3) as primers in an endogenous human immunodeficiency virus-1 in vitro reverse transcription/template-switching reaction.

    E. J. Arts;Xuguang Li;Zhengxian Gu;L. Kleiman

  • Effects of alterations of primer-binding site sequences on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication.

    Xuguang Li;Johnson Mak;Eric J. Arts;Zhengxian Gu

  • The Interaction of APOBEC3G with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nucleocapsid Inhibits tRNA3Lys Annealing to Viral RNA

    Fei Guo;Shan Cen;Meijuan Niu;Yiliang Yang

  • The Interaction between HIV-1 Gag and Human Lysyl-tRNA Synthetase during Viral Assembly

    Hassan Javanbakht;Rabih Halwani;Shan Cen;Jenan Saadatmand

  • HIV-1 Modulates the tRNA Pool to Improve Translation Efficiency

    Anna van Weringh;Manon Ragonnet-Cronin;Erinija Pranckeviciene;Mariana Pavon-Eternod

  • Characterization of a Putative α-Helix across the Capsid-SP1 Boundary That Is Critical for the Multimerization of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag

    Chen Liang;Jing Hu;Rodney S. Russell;Rodney S. Russell;Ariel Roldan

  • Incorporation of excess wild-type and mutant tRNA(3Lys) into human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

    Yue Huang;Johnson Mak;Qun Cao;Zhuo Li

  • Formation of the tRNALys packaging complex in HIV-1.

    Lawrence Kleiman;Christopher P. Jones;Karin Musier-Forsyth

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. Wainberg
Mark A. Wainberg McGill University
Chen Liang
Chen Liang McGill University
Johnson Mak
Johnson Mak Griffith University
Karin Musier-Forsyth
Karin Musier-Forsyth The Ohio State University
Michael A. Parniak
Michael A. Parniak University of Pittsburgh
Andrew J. Mouland
Andrew J. Mouland McGill University
Eric J. Arts
Eric J. Arts University of Western Ontario
Kiyotaka Shiba
Kiyotaka Shiba Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research
John Hiscott
John Hiscott Istituto Pasteur
Éric A. Cohen
Éric A. Cohen University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and career paths that complement this field. For professionals seeking to expand their expertise in healthcare management, exploring the best cahiim accredited him programs online is a smart choice. These programs provide vital skills in managing health information systems, essential in microbiology research and public health settings.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, fast certification options like the fast online medical billing and coding certification programs offer accelerated pathways to enter the workforce. These certifications can complement a microbiology background by providing in-depth knowledge of medical data processing, often needed in clinical lab environments.

Expanding further, there are diverse online medical programs that cater to students who wish to blend microbiology with broader medical education. These programs can lead to careers in medical research, diagnostics, or healthcare management.

Lastly, for those looking to influence community health and policy, easy admission online mph programs can be an excellent next step. Public health degrees complement microbiology knowledge by emphasizing disease prevention and health promotion at the population level.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence Kleiman

Recently Published Articles