World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
7191
World Ranking
6157
National Ranking
2228

Carey Jang publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carey Jang sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 77 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Carey Jang D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carey Jang sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carey Jang is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with notable contributions in Atmospheric Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Engineering, Automotive Engineering, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.

The scientist's work encompasses several main topics including Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting, Vehicle emissions and performance, Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies, as well as Atmospheric Ozone and Climate.

Carey Jang has published research in various academic venues such as Geoscientific Model Development, Journal of Environmental Management, Atmospheric Research, Atmosphere, and Environmental Science Atmospheres.

  • The Detailed Emissions Scaling, Isolation, and Diagnostic (DESID) module in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.3.2, 2021, Geoscientific model development
  • Estimation of abatement potentials and costs of air pollution emissions in China, 2020, Journal of Environmental Management
  • Mimicking atmospheric photochemical modeling with a deep neural network, 2021, Atmospheric Research
  • Predicting the Nonlinear Response of PM2.5 and Ozone to Precursor Emission Changes with a Response Surface Model, 2021, Atmosphere
  • Evaluating reduced-form modeling tools for simulating ozone and PM 2.5 monetized health impacts, 2023, Environmental Science Atmospheres

The scientist has collaborated frequently with Jia Xing, Shuxiao Wang, Yun Zhu, James T. Kelly, and Benjamin N. Murphy. These co-authors have worked together on multiple projects reflecting interdisciplinary approaches and combinations of expertise.

Best Publications

  • Air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games

    David G. Streets;Joshua S. Fu;Carey J. Jang;Jiming Hao

  • NOx emission trends for China, 1995–2004: The view from the ground and the view from space

    Qiang Zhang;David G. Streets;Kebin He;Yuxuan Wang

  • Linking ozone pollution and climate change: The case for controlling methane

    Arlene M. Fiore;Daniel J. Jacob;Brendan D. Field;David G. Streets

  • Simulating chemistry–aerosol–cloud–radiation–climate feedbacks over the continental U.S. using the online-coupled Weather Research Forecasting Model with chemistry (WRF/Chem)

    Yang Zhang;X.-Y. Wen;C.J. Jang

  • Scientific uncertainties in atmospheric mercury models I: Model science evaluation

    Che-Jen Lin;Pruek Pongprueksa;Steve E. Lindberg;Steve E. Lindberg;Simo O. Pehkonen

  • Impact assessment of ammonia emissions on inorganic aerosols in East China using response surface modeling technique.

    Shuxiao Wang;Jia Xing;Carey Jang;Yun Zhu

  • Nonlinear response of ozone to precursor emission changes in China: a modeling study using response surface methodology

    J. Xing;S. X. Wang;C. Jang;Y. Zhu

  • Understanding of regional air pollution over China using CMAQ, part II. Process analysis and sensitivity of ozone and particulate matter to precursor emissions

    Xiao-Huan Liu;Xiao-Huan Liu;Yang Zhang;Jia Xing;Qiang Zhang

  • On the future of carbonaceous aerosol emissions

    D. G. Streets;T. C. Bond;T. Lee;C. Jang

  • Understanding of regional air pollution over China using CMAQ, part I performance evaluation and seasonal variation

    Xiao-Huan Liu;Xiao-Huan Liu;Yang Zhang;Shu-Hui Cheng;Shu-Hui Cheng;Jia Xing

  • The Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program – Community Edition (BenMAP–CE): A tool to estimate the health and economic benefits of reducing air pollution

    Jason D Sacks;Jennifer M Lloyd;Yun Zhu;Jim Anderton

  • Meteorological and chemical impacts on ozone formation: A case study in Hangzhou, China

    Kangwei Li;Kangwei Li;Linghong Chen;Fang Ying;Stephen J. White

  • Effectiveness of national air pollution control policies on the air quality in metropolitan areas of China.

    Shuxiao Wang;Jia Xing;Bin Zhao;Carey Jang

  • Air quality and emissions in the Yangtze River Delta, China

    L. Li;C. H. Chen;Joshua Fu;C. Huang

  • Process analysis of regional ozone formation over the Yangtze River Delta, China using the Community Multi-scale Air Quality modeling system

    L. Li;C. H. Chen;C. Huang;H. Y. Huang

  • Modeling study on the air quality impacts from emission reductions and atypical meteorological conditions during the 2008 Beijing Olympics

    Jia Xing;Jia Xing;Yang Zhang;Shuxiao Wang;Xiaohuan Liu

  • Model estimate of mercury emission from natural sources in East Asia

    Suraj K. Shetty;Che-Jen Lin;Che-Jen Lin;David G. Streets;Carey Jang

  • Deep learning for prediction of the air quality response to emission changes

    Jia Xing;Shuxin Zheng;Dian Ding;James T Kelly

  • Impacts of global, regional, and sectoral black carbon emission reductions on surface air quality and human mortality

    S. C. Anenberg;S. C. Anenberg;K. Talgo;S. Arunachalam;P. Dolwick

  • A modeling study of the nonlinear response of fine particles to air pollutant emissions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region

    Bin Zhao;Bin Zhao;Wenjing Wu;Shuxiao Wang;Jia Xing

  • Assessment of air quality benefits from national air pollution control policies in China. Part II: Evaluation of air quality predictions and air quality benefits assessment

    Litao Wang;Litao Wang;Carey Jang;Yang Zhang;Kai Wang

  • Effects of using the CB05 vs. SAPRC99 vs. CB4 chemical mechanism on model predictions : Ozone and gas-phase photochemical precursor concentrations

    D.J. Luecken;S. Phillips;G. Sarwar;C. Jang

Frequent Co-Authors

Shuxiao Wang
Shuxiao Wang Tsinghua University
Jia Xing
Jia Xing Tsinghua University
Che-Jen Lin
Che-Jen Lin Lamar University
Joshua S. Fu
Joshua S. Fu University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Jiming Hao
Jiming Hao Tsinghua University
David G. Streets
David G. Streets Harvard University
Qiang Zhang
Qiang Zhang Peking University
Qiang Zhang
Qiang Zhang Tsinghua University
Yang Zhang
Yang Zhang Northeastern University
Steve E. Lindberg
Steve E. Lindberg Oak Ridge National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related fields can expand career opportunities and provide valuable interdisciplinary knowledge. Many programs, such as cheapest online general studies degree programs, offer flexible and affordable options for those seeking broad foundational skills alongside environmental studies.

Additionally, some find that choosing easiest bachelor's degree paths can help balance personal commitments while still gaining essential knowledge in related areas that complement environmental science careers.

Specialized degrees like a geology online degree deepen understanding of earth processes, an important aspect of environmental studies, with many programs available online for greater accessibility.

Moreover, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has become a vital tool in environmental research and decision-making. Students can pursue some of the best GIS graduate programs online to gain advanced skills in mapping and spatial analysis, enhancing their competitiveness in the job market.

Best Scientists Citing Carey Jang

Trending Scientists