World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Avery B. Nathens

Avery B. Nathens

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 107 6168 5802 243 232 584 49865

Avery B. Nathens publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Avery B. Nathens between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Avery B. Nathens published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 18.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2016. 39 of the 633 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2016. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 5 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 34 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 35 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 38 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 9 publications
1992 2025

633 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Avery B. Nathens: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 5
1996 9
1997 9
1998 5
1999 4
2000 9
2001 12
2002 8
2003 13
2004 10
2005 17
2006 34
2007 27
2008 24
2009 25
2010 35
2011 22
2012 27
2013 19
2014 27
2015 30
2016 38
2017 35
2018 21
2019 27
2020 30
2021 32
2022 17
2023 20
2024 30
2025 9
Total 633
Download as CSV

Avery B. Nathens publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Avery B. Nathens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 584 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 584
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Avery B. Nathens D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Avery B. Nathens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 107
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Avery B. Nathens is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada, with a significant body of research spanning medicine, particularly in emergency medicine and surgery. Their scholarly output includes over 300 publications primarily focused on trauma and emergency care studies.

The main fields of study associated with Nathens include Medicine, with a concentration in the following subfields:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Neurology
  • General Health Professions

Their research emphasizes several key topics, notably:

  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Trauma Management and Diagnosis
  • Injury Epidemiology and Prevention

Nathens has published extensively in several prominent venues, including:

  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons
  • JAMA Network Open
  • JAMA Surgery
  • Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine

Among recent publications, notable papers include:

  • Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open), 2020, Annals of Surgery
  • Evaluation of Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness and Outcomes Among US Trauma Centers, 2021, JAMA Pediatrics
  • Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness and Short-term and Long-term Mortality Among Children Receiving Emergency Care, 2023, JAMA Network Open
  • Association of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Neurosurgical Intervention for Traumatic Brain Injury With Thromboembolic Complications, Repeated Neurosurgery, and Mortality, 2021, JAMA Surgery
  • Operative vs Nonoperative Treatment of Acute Unstable Chest Wall Injuries, 2022, JAMA Surgery

Frequent collaborators in Nathens' work include:

  • Matthew P. Guttman
  • Barbara Haas
  • Christopher D. Witiw
  • Jefferson R. Wilson
  • Armaan K. Malhotra

Best Publications

  • Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases

    Seok Junhee Seok;Shaw Warren H. Shaw Warren;G. Cuenca Alex;N. Mindrinos Michael

  • A National Evaluation of the Effect of Trauma-Center Care on Mortality

    Ellen J. MacKenzie;Frederick P. Rivara;Gregory J. Jurkovich;Avery B. Nathens

  • Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

    Joseph S. Solomkin;John E. Mazuski;John S. Bradley;Keith A. Rodvold

  • A network-based analysis of systemic inflammation in humans

    Steve E. Calvano;Wenzhong Xiao;Daniel R. Richards;Ramon M. Felciano

  • A genomic storm in critically injured humans

    Wenzhong Xiao;Wenzhong Xiao;Michael N. Mindrinos;Junhee Seok;Joseph Cuschieri

  • Transfusion-related acute lung injury : Definition and review

    Pearl Toy;Mark A. Popovsky;Edward Abraham;Daniel R. Ambruso

  • Relationship Between Trauma Center Volume and Outcomes

    Avery B. Nathens;Gregory J. Jurkovich;Ronald V. Maier;David C. Grossman

  • Trial of Short-Course Antimicrobial Therapy for Intraabdominal Infection

    Robert G. Sawyer;Jeffrey A. Claridge;Avery B. Nathens;Ori D. Rotstein

  • Guidelines for the Selection of Anti-infective Agents for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections

    Joseph S. Solomkin;John E. Mazuski;Ellen J. Baron;Robert G. Sawyer

  • Randomized, Prospective Trial of Antioxidant Supplementation in Critically Ill Surgical Patients

    Avery B. Nathens;Margaret J. Neff;Gregory J. Jurkovich;Patricia Klotz

  • The effect of organized systems of trauma care on motor vehicle crash mortality.

    Avery B. Nathens;Gregory J. Jurkovich;Peter Cummings;Frederick P. Rivara

  • Effectiveness of state trauma systems in reducing injury-related mortality: a national evaluation.

    Avery B. Nathens;Gregory J. Jurkovich;Frederick P. Rivara;Ronald V. Maier

  • Management of severe head injury: institutional variations in care and effect on outcome.

    Eileen M. Bulger;Avery B. Nathens;Frederick P. Rivara;Maria Moore

  • Clinical practice guideline: management of acute pancreatitis

    Joshua A. Greenberg;Jonathan Hsu;Mohammad Bawazeer;John Marshall

  • Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in surgical patients: a systematic review of the evidence.

    Avery B. Nathens;John C. Marshall

  • The effect of age on functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: 6-Month report of a prospective multicenter trial

    Anne C. Mosenthal;David H. Livingston;Robert F. Lavery;Margaret M. Knudson

  • Tissue oxygen saturation predicts the development of organ dysfunction during traumatic shock resuscitation

    Stephen M. Cohn;Avery B. Nathens;Frederick A. Moore;Peter Rhee

  • Flail chest injuries: a review of outcomes and treatment practices from the National Trauma Data Bank

    Niloofar Dehghan;Charles de Mestral;Michael D. McKee;Emil H. Schemitsch

  • A nationwide US study of post-traumatic stress after hospitalization for physical injury.

    Douglas F. Zatzick;Frederick P. Rivara;Avery B. Nathens;Gregory J. Jurkovich

  • The Association Between Fluid Administration and Outcome Following Major Burn: A Multicenter Study

    Matthew B. Klein;Douglas Hayden;Constance Elson;Avery B. Nathens

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald A. Redelmeier
Donald A. Redelmeier University of Toronto
Frederick P. Rivara
Frederick P. Rivara University of Washington
Ronald V. Maier
Ronald V. Maier University of Washington
Ori D. Rotstein
Ori D. Rotstein University of Toronto
Robert A. Fowler
Robert A. Fowler Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Gregory J. Jurkovich
Gregory J. Jurkovich University of California, Davis
Nicole S. Gibran
Nicole S. Gibran University of Washington
Belinda J. Gabbe
Belinda J. Gabbe Monash University
Sharon E. Straus
Sharon E. Straus University of Toronto
Rahim Moineddin
Rahim Moineddin University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to a wide range of online healthcare degrees. For those interested in healthcare administration, it’s crucial to choose which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme? Accreditation ensures the program meets rigorous academic standards and is highly regarded by employers.

Aspiring nurses might consider advancing their education through programs designed for working professionals. Several schools now offer the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements, providing flexible pathways to earn a degree without the need for in-person practicums.

For nurses aiming to reach the highest level of practice, online doctoral programs offer both speed and affordability. Some universities deliver the fastest options via their dnp online programs, helping you complete your education efficiently. If cost is a concern, it’s also worth exploring affordable dnp programs to minimize financial barriers while advancing your qualifications.

These degree pathways provide flexible, accessible options for those seeking to move forward in the medical field or pursue alternative careers in healthcare leadership and advanced practice.

Best Scientists Citing Avery B. Nathens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles