World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
66863
World Ranking
7486
National Ranking
3913

Anthony N. DeMaria publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony N. DeMaria sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 809 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Anthony N. DeMaria D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony N. DeMaria sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony N. DeMaria is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Epidemiology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their work includes numerous contributions in the following subfields of study:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Surgery
  • Epidemiology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Key topics addressed in their research embrace:

  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions

Among the frequent coauthors collaborating with Anthony N. DeMaria are Sachiyo Igata, Andrew M. Kahn, Fatemeh Adabifirouzjaei, Matthew D. Solomon, and Alan S. Go.

The scientist's publications are regularly featured in several prominent venues, including:

  • Structural Heart
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
  • Circulation

Recent notable publications include:

  • Intracoronary ALLogeneic heart STem cells to Achieve myocardial Regeneration (ALLSTAR): a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Comparison of an Initial Risk-Based Testing Strategy vs Usual Testing in Stable Symptomatic Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease, 2023, JAMA Cardiology
  • Non-invasive imaging in coronary syndromes: recommendations of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography, in collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2021, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Intravascularly infused extracellular matrix as a biomaterial for targeting and treating inflamed tissues, 2022, Nature Biomedical Engineering
  • Prevalence of subclinical retinal ischemia in patients with cardiovascular disease - a hypothesis driven study, 2021, EClinicalMedicine

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms.

    N. B. Schiller;P. M. Shah;M. Crawford;A. DeMaria

  • Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements.

    D J Sahn;A DeMaria;J Kisslo;A Weyman

  • Effect of Intensive Compared With Moderate Lipid-Lowering Therapy on Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Steven E. Nissen;E. Murat Tuzcu;Paul Schoenhagen;B. Greg Brown

  • ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging)

    Francis J. Klocke;Michael G. Baird;Beverly H. Lorell;Timothy M. Bateman

  • A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Study of Intravenous Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells (Prochymal) After Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Joshua M. Hare;Jay H. Traverse;Timothy D. Henry;Nabil Dib

  • Report of the American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Nomenclature and Standards in Two-dimensional Echocardiography.

    W L Henry;A DeMaria;R Gramiak;D L King

  • Utility of B-Natriuretic Peptide in Detecting Diastolic Dysfunction Comparison With Doppler Velocity Recordings

    Emily Lubien;Anthony DeMaria;Padma Krishnaswamy;Paul Clopton

  • State of the art: using natriuretic peptide levels in clinical practice.

    Alan Maisel;Alan Maisel;Christian Mueller;Kirkwood Adams;Stefan D. Anker

  • Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease.

    Steven Nissen;John C. Gurley;Cindy L. Grines;David C. Booth

  • ACC/AHA/ASNC Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging—Executive Summary

    Francis J. Klocke;Michael G. Baird;Beverly H. Lorell

  • Consensus recommendations for the management of chronic heart failure: Introduction

    Milton Packer;Jay N. Cohn;William T. Abraham;Wilson S. Colucci

  • Intracoronary gene transfer of fibroblast growth factor-5 increases blood flow and contractile function in an ischemic region of the heart.

    Giordano Fj;Ping P;McKirnan;Nozaki S

  • Prognostic value of Doppler transmitral flow patterns in patients with congestive heart failure

    Gong-Yuan Xie;Martin R. Berk;Mikel D. Smith;John C. Gurley

  • Quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation by doppler color flow imaging: Angiographic and hemodynamic correlations

    Michael G. Spain;Mikel D. Smith;Paul A. Grayburn;Edward A. Harlamert

  • Safety and Efficacy of an Injectable Extracellular Matrix Hydrogel for Treating Myocardial Infarction

    Sonya B. Seif-Naraghi;Jennifer M. Singelyn;Michael A. Salvatore;Kent G. Osborn

  • Utility of B-natriuretic peptide levels in identifying patients with left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction

    Padma Krishnaswamy;Emily Lubien;Paul Clopton;Jen Koon

  • Application of a new phased-array ultrasound imaging catheter in the assessment of vascular dimensions. In vivo comparison to cineangiography.

    Steven E. Nissen;Cindy L. Grines;John C. Gurley;Kevin Sublett

  • Determination of right atrial and right ventricular size by two-dimensional echocardiography.

    William J Bommer;L. Weinert;A. Neumann;J. Neef

  • Contraction and relaxation velocities of the normal left ventricle using pulsed-wave tissue Doppler echocardiography.

    Leonarda Galiuto;Gianfranco Ignone;Anthony N DeMaria

  • Obstructive coronary atherosclerosis and ischemic heart disease: an elusive link!

    Mario Marzilli;C. Noel Bairey Merz;William E. Boden;Robert O. Bonow

Frequent Co-Authors

Dean T. Mason
Dean T. Mason St Mary's Hospital
Ezra A. Amsterdam
Ezra A. Amsterdam University of California, Davis
Steven E. Nissen
Steven E. Nissen Cleveland Clinic
Sotirios Tsimikas
Sotirios Tsimikas University of California, San Diego
Alan S. Maisel
Alan S. Maisel University of California, San Diego
Barry H. Greenberg
Barry H. Greenberg University of California, San Diego
Jagat Narula
Jagat Narula Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Joao A.C. Lima
Joao A.C. Lima Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Timothy D. Henry
Timothy D. Henry Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA has never been more flexible, thanks to a growing number of online degree pathways. For registered nurses seeking advancement, many rn bsn online programs no clinicals offer the chance to earn a BSN without the traditional in-person clinical requirements, making it easier for working professionals to balance study and life.

For those aiming for the highest levels of nursing leadership, there are a variety of dnp online programs and dnp programs online that cater to both speed and accessibility. These programs can help nurses move into advanced practice or educational roles more efficiently by offering condensed timelines and flexible online formats.

If you are looking for a quicker entry point into the medical field, 6 month lpn program options allow students to start working as Licensed Practical Nurses in a matter of months. Whether aiming for a rapid start in healthcare or advancing to higher positions, these related online degrees provide diverse pathways to match your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony N. DeMaria

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles