World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexander McKelvie

Alexander McKelvie

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
33
Citations
8007
World Ranking
2422
National Ranking
952

Alexander McKelvie publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander McKelvie sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 111 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Alexander McKelvie D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander McKelvie sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander McKelvie is affiliated with Syracuse University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, with additional work in Economics, Econometrics and Finance.

The main areas of study that characterize McKelvie's work include:

  • Business, Management and Accounting
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Within these broader fields, the scientist has contributed notably to several subfields:

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Accounting
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management

Their research topics cover a range of subjects relevant to entrepreneurship and business growth:

  • Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Family Business Performance and Succession
  • Private Equity and Venture Capital
  • Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management

McKelvie has published extensively, with important papers appearing in respected journals. Selected recent papers include:

  • "What do they think and feel about growth? Examining small business managers' attitudes towards growth in the United States," 2021, Journal of Business Venturing Insights
  • "Entrepreneurial mindset in corporate entrepreneurship: Forms, impediments, and actions for research," 2021, Journal of Small Business Management
  • "Entrepreneurship as an auspicious context for mental health research," 2022, Journal of Business Venturing Insights
  • "Path Dependence in New Ventures' Capital Structures," 2020, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
  • "Social support and its effects on self-efficacy among entrepreneurs with disabilities," 2021, Journal of Business Venturing Insights

Frequent publication venues for McKelvie include:

  • Journal of Business Venturing Insights
  • Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
  • Small Business Economics
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Small Business Management

Alexander McKelvie has also contributed to book publications, with titles including:

  • Scale-ups and High-Growth Firms, published by Springer Nature in 2024
  • Entrepreneurship Addiction, published by Edward Elgar Publishing in 2022

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Sven-Olov Daunfeldt
  • April J. Spivack
  • Alex Coad
  • Anders Bornhäll
  • Mirza Tihic

Best Publications

  • Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study

    Gaylen N. Chandler;Dawn R. DeTienne;Alexander McKelvie;Troy V. Mumford

  • Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate

    Alexander McKelvie;Johan Wiklund

  • From resource base to dynamic capabilities: An investigation of new firms

    Alexander McKelvie;Per Davidsson

  • Unpacking the uncertainty construct: Implications for entrepreneurial action

    Alexander McKelvie;J. Michael Haynie;Veronica Gustavsson

  • The organizational pervasiveness of entrepreneurial orientation

    William Wales;Erik Monsen;Alexander McKelvie

  • Making sense of entrepreneurial exit strategies: A typology and test

    Dawn R. DeTienne;Alexander McKelvie;Gaylen N. Chandler

  • Untangling the relationships among growth, profitability and survival in new firms

    Frédéric Delmar;Frédéric Delmar;Alexander McKelvie;Karl Wennberg;Karl Wennberg

  • Signaling for more money: The roles of founders' human capital and investor prominence in resource acquisition across different stages of firm development

    Eun Jeong Ko;Alexander McKelvie

  • The strategic management of high-growth firms:a review and theoretical conceptualization

    Robert Demir;Karl Wennberg;Alexander McKelvie

  • Making it personal: : Opportunity individuation and the shaping of opportunity beliefs

    Matthew S. Wood;Alexander McKelvie;J. Michael Haynie

  • Firm and industry effects on firm performance: A generalization and extension for new ventures

    Jeremy C. Short;Jeremy C. Short;Alexander McKelvie;David J. Ketchen;Gaylen N. Chandler

  • What matters, matters differently: a conjoint analysis of the decision policies of angel and venture capital investors

    Dan K. Hsu;J. Michael Haynie;Sharon A. Simmons;Alexander McKelvie

  • What is entrepreneurial failure? Implications for future research

    Anna Jenkins;Alexander McKelvie

  • Asset specificity and behavioral uncertainty as moderators of the sales growth–employment growth relationship in emerging ventures

    Gaylen N. Chandler;Alexander McKelvie;Per Davidsson;Per Davidsson

  • Opportunity Evaluation as Future Focused Cognition: Identifying Conceptual Themes and Empirical Trends

    Matthew S. Wood;Alexander McKelvie

  • Habitual entrepreneurs: Possible cases of entrepreneurship addiction?

    April J. Spivack;Alexander McKelvie;J. Michael Haynie

  • Variable Risk Preferences in New Firm Growth and Survival

    Karl Wennberg;Frédéric Delmar;Alexander McKelvie

  • What about new entry? Examining the theorized role of new entry in the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship:

    William Wales;Johan Wiklund;Alexander McKelvie

  • The role of organizational size in the heterogeneous nature of corporate entrepreneurship

    Robert S. Nason;Alexander McKelvie;George Lumpkin

  • Externally Acquired or Internally Generated? Knowledge Development and Perceived Environmental Dynamism in New Venture Innovation:

    Alexander McKelvie;Johan Wiklund;Anna Brattström

  • How young firms achieve growth: reconciling the roles of growth motivation and innovative activities

    Alexander McKelvie;Anna Brattström;Karl Wennberg;Karl Wennberg

  • The measurement of effectuation: highlighting research tensions and opportunities for the future

    Alexander McKelvie;Gaylen N. Chandler;Dawn R. DeTienne;Anette Johansson

  • Asset specificity and behavioural uncertainty as moderators of the sales growth : employment growth relationship in emerging ventures

    Gaylen Chandler;Alexander McKelvie;Per Davidsson

Frequent Co-Authors

Johan Wiklund
Johan Wiklund Syracuse University
Karl Wennberg
Karl Wennberg Stockholm School of Economics
Frédéric Delmar
Frédéric Delmar EMLYON Business School
Per Davidsson
Per Davidsson Jönköping University
Jeremy C. Short
Jeremy C. Short University of North Texas
G. T. Lumpkin
G. T. Lumpkin University of Tennessee at Knoxville
David J. Ketchen
David J. Ketchen Auburn University
Jon C. Carr
Jon C. Carr North Carolina State University
Michael A. Hitt
Michael A. Hitt Texas A&M University
Jeffery S. McMullen
Jeffery S. McMullen Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management studies in the USA can open doors to many specialized online degrees and emerging career paths. Today, students are increasingly seeking flexible, affordable options that align with their career goals and busy lifestyles.

For those interested in sectors like the built environment, an affordable online construction management degree can provide crucial industry skills and prepare graduates for leadership roles in construction and project management. Meanwhile, professionals looking to advance into executive leadership can benefit from an online executive mba, designed to fit around work commitments while delivering advanced business knowledge.

Many universities also offer a range of inexpensive masters degrees that make it possible for students to upskill in areas like finance, marketing, and management without breaking the bank. Additionally, there’s growing demand for specialized programs such as top data science programs, essential for those pursuing careers in business analytics, research, or information management.

Choosing an online degree pathway offers flexibility, cost savings, and access to high-demand fields. It’s a smart step for anyone aiming to accelerate their business or management career in the USA and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander McKelvie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles