World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 79 1682 1532 47 38 256 23490

Reto Crameri publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Reto Crameri between 1981 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Reto Crameri published across 43 years, from 1981 to 2023, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2002. 1 of the 265 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2002. 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 20 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1981 2023

265 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Reto Crameri: publications per year, 1981 to 2023
Year Publications
1981 2
1982 3
1983 3
1984 2
1985 2
1986 1
1987 2
1988 1
1989 3
1990 0
1991 3
1992 4
1993 2
1994 5
1995 5
1996 14
1997 5
1998 12
1999 16
2000 7
2001 11
2002 20
2003 15
2004 8
2005 14
2006 19
2007 11
2008 12
2009 12
2010 5
2011 11
2012 8
2013 3
2014 5
2015 5
2016 9
2017 3
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
Total 265
Download as CSV

Reto Crameri publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reto Crameri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 252–261 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 256 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148 256
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Reto Crameri D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reto Crameri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127 79
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Reto Crameri is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland and engages in research primarily within the broad fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine. Their work spans several interconnected areas of study and investigation.

The scientist's research encompasses the following main fields:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Within these areas, they contribute to specific subfields, including:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biophysics

Their main research topics cover a range of scientific inquiries such as:

  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques

This focus indicates a multidisciplinary approach combining molecular biology techniques with imaging and computational methods to explore biological systems and biomedical questions.

Although there are no recent papers listed, no frequent co-authors or prevalent publication venues are specified. Information on book publications or awards is also not recorded, which suggests either an emphasis on journal articles or unpublished collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Immune Responses in Healthy and Allergic Individuals Are Characterized by a Fine Balance between Allergen-specific T Regulatory 1 and T Helper 2 Cells

    Miibeccel Akdis;Johan Verhagen;Alison Taylor;Fariba Karamloo

  • Interleukins, from 1 to 37, and interferon-γ: receptors, functions, and roles in diseases

    Mübeccel Akdis;Simone Burgler;Reto Crameri;Thomas Eiwegger

  • Interleukins (from IL-1 to IL-38), interferons, transforming growth factor β, and TNF-α: Receptors, functions, and roles in diseases

    Mübeccel Akdis;Alar Aab;Can Altunbulakli;Kursat Azkur

  • EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide.

    P.M Matricardi;J Kleine-Tebbe;H.J Hoffmann;R Valenta

  • Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis in Cystic Fibrosis—State of the Art: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Conference

    David A. Stevens;Richard B. Moss;Viswanath P. Kurup;Alan P. Knutsen

  • Microarrayed allergen molecules: diagnostic gatekeepers for allergy treatment.

    Reinhard Hiller;Sylvia Laffer;Christian Harwanegg;Martin Huber

  • Intralymphatic allergen administration renders specific immunotherapy faster and safer: a randomized controlled trial.

    Gabriela Senti;Bettina M. Prinz Vavricka;Iris Erdmann;Mella I. Diaz

  • Selective Cloning of Peanut Allergens, Including Profilin and 2S Albumins, by Phage Display Technology

    Tamara Kleber-Janke;Reto Crameri;Ulrich Appenzeller;Max Schlaak

  • GATA3-Driven Th2 Responses Inhibit TGF-β1–Induced FOXP3 Expression and the Formation of Regulatory T Cells

    Pierre-Yves Mantel;Harmjan Kuipers;Onur Boyman;Claudio Rhyner

  • Display of biologically active proteins on the surface of filamentous phages: a cDNA cloning system for selection of functional gene products linked to the genetic information responsible for their production

    Reto Crameri;Mark Suter

  • Conidial hydrophobins of Aspergillus fumigatus.

    Sophie Paris;Jean-Paul Debeaupuis;Reto Crameri;Marilyn Carey

  • Intralymphatic immunotherapy for cat allergy induces tolerance after only 3 injections

    Gabriela Senti;Reto Crameri;Daniela Kuster;Pål Johansen

  • IgE-mediated and T cell–mediated autoimmunity against manganese superoxide dismutase in atopic dermatitis

    Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier;Sabine Flückiger;Rainer Disch;Axel Trautmann

  • Erratum: Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in cystic fibrosis - State of the art: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Conference (Clinical Infectious Diseases (2003) 37:Suppl. 3 (S225-64))

    D. A. Stevens;R. B. Moss;V. P. Kurup;A. P. Knutsen

  • Humoral and cell-mediated autoimmunity in allergy to Aspergillus fumigatus.

    R Crameri;A Faith;S Hemmann;R Jaussi

  • T cells and eosinophils cooperate in the induction of bronchial epithelial cell apoptosis in asthma

    Axel Trautmann;Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier;Katja Krüger;Reto Crameri

  • Recombinant Aspergillus fumigatus allergens: from the nucleotide sequences to clinical applications.

    Reto Crameri

  • MeDALL (Mechanisms of the Development of ALLergy): an integrated approach from phenotypes to systems medicine

    J. Bousquet;J. Anto;C. Auffray;M. Akdis

  • Important research questions in allergy and related diseases: nonallergic rhinitis: a GA2LEN paper

    J. Bousquet;W. Fokkens;P. Burney;S. R. Durham

  • Selected recombinant Aspergillus fumigatus allergens bind specifically to IgE in ABPA

    V P Kurup;B Banerjee;S Hemmann;P A Greenberger

  • Effect of Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis on Lung Function in Children with Cystic Fibrosis

    Richard Kraemer;Natascha Deloséa;Pietro Ballinari;Sabina Gallati

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt Blaser
Kurt Blaser University of Zurich
Cezmi A. Akdis
Cezmi A. Akdis University of Zurich
Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier
Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier University of Zurich
Annika Scheynius
Annika Scheynius Karolinska Institute
Mübeccel Akdis
Mübeccel Akdis University of Zurich
Michael Breitenbach
Michael Breitenbach University of Salzburg
Leonardo Scapozza
Leonardo Scapozza University of Geneva
Thomas M. Kündig
Thomas M. Kündig University of Zurich
Rudolf Valenta
Rudolf Valenta Medical University of Vienna
Liam O'Mahony
Liam O'Mahony University College Cork

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Immunology in the USA, exploring related advanced degrees can open diverse career opportunities in healthcare and research. Many professionals complement their immunology background with nursing roles, such as psychiatric nurse practitioners, where demand continues to grow. Prospective students can consider enrolling in top online pmhnp programs known for their excellent clinical placement rates, ensuring hands-on experience and effective transition into mental health nursing.

Cost is a significant factor for many learners. Those on a budget should look into the cheapest psychiatric nurse practitioner programs, which offer quality education without the high price tag. Balancing affordability with program reputation is key when selecting an online degree.

Career advancement may also involve specialization. Nurses seeking to shift roles can explore certifications like the acute care np certification, enabling them to provide critical care in hospital settings. Given the specialized training, understanding potential earnings is crucial; reviewing dnp salary by specialty helps professionals make informed decisions about their education and career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Reto Crameri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles