World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 56 3505 124 131 11469

Wim J. Kleijer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wim J. Kleijer between 1970 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wim J. Kleijer published across 43 years, from 1970 to 2012, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 1997. 2 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2012. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 1997. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 5 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications
1970 2012

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wim J. Kleijer: publications per year, 1970 to 2012
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 5
1974 1
1975 2
1976 1
1977 1
1978 3
1979 0
1980 3
1981 1
1982 0
1983 5
1984 4
1985 5
1986 5
1987 1
1988 2
1989 3
1990 8
1991 6
1992 5
1993 5
1994 9
1995 9
1996 10
1997 16
1998 14
1999 9
2000 7
2001 9
2002 7
2003 3
2004 2
2005 3
2006 9
2007 6
2008 5
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 2
Total 188
Download as CSV

Wim J. Kleijer publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim J. Kleijer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 125–134 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 131 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217 131
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Wim J. Kleijer D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim J. Kleijer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179 56
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Wim J. Kleijer is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. The scholar's research profile shows a connection to this institution, which is known for its work in social sciences, economics, and medical research among other fields.

Although specific publications, co-authors, and detailed research topics related to Wim J. Kleijer are not publicly listed, the affiliation with Erasmus University Rotterdam suggests potential involvement in research areas commonly explored at this institution. Erasmus University has a strong focus on interdisciplinary studies spanning health sciences, economics, business, and social sciences.

No recent papers or defined areas of study are available to further detail the main fields or subfields of study for Wim J. Kleijer. Similarly, there is no publicly available data on frequent publication venues or awards associated with this researcher.

The absence of detailed information on book publications or citation metrics may indicate either early career stage or a specific research focus with limited indexing in the commonly surveyed databases.

Given this context, the profile remains focused on the identified affiliation, allowing for the possibility that Wim J. Kleijer's work contributes to the broader academic environment of Erasmus University Rotterdam, which encompasses a variety of scholarly disciplines and collaborative research initiatives.

Best Publications

  • Senescence‐associated β‐galactosidase is lysosomal β‐galactosidase

    Bo Yun Lee;Jung A. Han;Jun Sub Im;Amelia Morrone

  • A new progeroid syndrome reveals that genotoxic stress suppresses the somatotroph axis

    Laura J. Niedernhofer;George A. Garinis;Anja Raams;Astrid S. Lalai

  • Loss of ZMPSTE24 (FACE-1) causes autosomal recessive restrictive dermopathy and accumulation of Lamin A precursors

    Claire L. Navarro;Juan Cadiñanos;Annachiara De Sandre-Giovannoli;Rafaëlle Bernard

  • Genotype and phenotype in patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency.

    A. B. van Kuilenburg;P. Vreken;N. G. Abeling;H. D. Bakker

  • Incidence of DNA repair deficiency disorders in western Europe: Xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy.

    Wim J. Kleijer;Vincent Laugel;Mark Berneburg;Tiziana Nardo

  • Genotype versus phenotype in families with androgen insensitivity syndrome.

    Annemie L. M. Boehmer;Annemie L. M. Boehmer;Hennie Brüggenwirth;Cissy van Assendelft;Barto J. Otten

  • First Reported Patient with Human ERCC1 Deficiency Has Cerebro-Oculo-Facio-Skeletal Syndrome with a Mild Defect in Nucleotide Excision Repair and Severe Developmental Failure

    Nicolaas G.J. Jaspers;Anja Raams;Margherita Cirillo Silengo;Nils Wijgers

  • Mutations in the gene encoding capillary morphogenesis protein 2 cause juvenile hyaline fibromatosis and infantile systemic hyalinosis.

    Sandra Hanks;Sarah Adams;Jenny Douglas;Laura Arbour

  • Molecular analysis of mutations in DNA polymerase η in xeroderma pigmentosum-variant patients

    Bernard C. Broughton;Agnes Cordonnier;Wim J. Kleijer;Nicolaas G. J. Jaspers

  • Inversion of the IDS gene resulting from recombination with IDS-related sequences is a common cause of the Hunter syndrome.

    Maire-Louise Bondeson;Niklas Dahl;Helena Malmgren;Wim J. Kleijer

  • Twenty-two novel mutations in the lysosomal alpha-glucosidase gene (GAA) underscore the genotype-phenotype correlation in glycogen storage disease type II.

    Monique M.P. Hermans;Dik van Leenen;Marian A. Kroos;Clare E. Beesley

  • Presence of ATM protein and residual kinase activity correlates with the phenotype in ataxia-telangiectasia: a genotype-phenotype study.

    Mijke M. M. Verhagen;Frans B. L. Hogervorst;Dominique F. C. M. Smeets

  • Clinical heterogeneity within xeroderma pigmentosum associated with mutations in the DNA repair and transcription gene ERCC3

    W. Vermeulen;R. J. Scott;S. Rodgers;H. J. Müller

  • Cerebro-oculo-facio-skeletal syndrome with a nucleotide excision-repair defect and a mutated XPD gene, with prenatal diagnosis in a triplet pregnancy.

    John M. Graham;Kwame Anyane-Yeboa;Anja Raams;Esther Appeldoorn

  • Mucopolysaccharidosis type I: identification of 8 novel mutations and determination of the frequency of the two common α-L-iduronidase mutations (W402X and Q70X) among European patients

    Bunge S;Kleijer Wj;Steglich C;Beck M

  • A temperature-sensitive disorder in basal transcription and DNA repair in humans

    Wim Vermeulen;Suzanne Rademakers;Nicolaas G.J. Jaspers;Esther Appeldoorn

  • Genetic heterogeneity of the excision repair defect associated with trichothiodystrophy.

    Miria Stefanini;Paola Lagomarsini;Silvia Giliani;Tiziana Nardo

  • Different Removal of Ultraviolet Photoproducts in Genetically Related Xeroderma Pigmentosum and Trichothiodystrophy Diseases

    Eric Eveno;François Bourre;Xavier Quilliet;Odile Chevallier-Lagente

  • Genotype-phenotype correlations in mucopolysaccharidosis type I using enzyme kinetics, immunoquantification and in vitro turnover studies.

    Susanna Bunge;Peter R. Clements;Sharon Byers;Wim J. Kleijer

  • Molecular basis of androgen insensitivity.

    H.T. Brüggenwirth;A.L.M. Boehmer;M.C.T. Verleun-Mooijman;T. Hoogenboezem

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicolaas G. J. Jaspers
Nicolaas G. J. Jaspers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ronald J.A. Wanders
Ronald J.A. Wanders University of Amsterdam
Arnold J. J. Reuser
Arnold J. J. Reuser Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dirk Bootsma
Dirk Bootsma Erasmus University Rotterdam
John J. Hopwood
John J. Hopwood University of Adelaide
Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers
Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ulf Pettersson
Ulf Pettersson Uppsala University
Alain Sarasin
Alain Sarasin Institut Gustave Roussy
Wim Vermeulen
Wim Vermeulen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Alan R. Lehmann
Alan R. Lehmann University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Genetics, there are several flexible online learning options to help you start or advance your career. Many students begin with programs related to healthcare and data management, such as medical coding programs. These provide a quick entry into the healthcare workforce, offering essential skills in medical records and billing.

For those seeking to complete their studies quickly, fast track school programs are available in various science and health disciplines. These programs condense coursework, allowing you to earn your degree faster and transition to the job market sooner.

Flexibility remains a key advantage in online education. Students looking for greater control over their schedules can explore self paced online college options. This approach is ideal for balancing studies with work or family commitments.

Finally, affordability and accessibility are important factors. Many accredited online universities offer programs without application fees, making it easier to get started on your educational journey in genetics or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Wim J. Kleijer

Recently Published Articles