World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
56
Citations
11469
World Ranking
3505
National Ranking
124

Wim J. Kleijer publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim J. Kleijer sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 131 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Wim J. Kleijer D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim J. Kleijer sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wim J. Kleijer is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. The scholar's research profile shows a connection to this institution, which is known for its work in social sciences, economics, and medical research among other fields.

Although specific publications, co-authors, and detailed research topics related to Wim J. Kleijer are not publicly listed, the affiliation with Erasmus University Rotterdam suggests potential involvement in research areas commonly explored at this institution. Erasmus University has a strong focus on interdisciplinary studies spanning health sciences, economics, business, and social sciences.

No recent papers or defined areas of study are available to further detail the main fields or subfields of study for Wim J. Kleijer. Similarly, there is no publicly available data on frequent publication venues or awards associated with this researcher.

The absence of detailed information on book publications or citation metrics may indicate either early career stage or a specific research focus with limited indexing in the commonly surveyed databases.

Given this context, the profile remains focused on the identified affiliation, allowing for the possibility that Wim J. Kleijer's work contributes to the broader academic environment of Erasmus University Rotterdam, which encompasses a variety of scholarly disciplines and collaborative research initiatives.

Best Publications

  • Senescence‐associated β‐galactosidase is lysosomal β‐galactosidase

    Bo Yun Lee;Jung A. Han;Jun Sub Im;Amelia Morrone

  • A new progeroid syndrome reveals that genotoxic stress suppresses the somatotroph axis

    Laura J. Niedernhofer;George A. Garinis;Anja Raams;Astrid S. Lalai

  • Loss of ZMPSTE24 (FACE-1) causes autosomal recessive restrictive dermopathy and accumulation of Lamin A precursors

    Claire L. Navarro;Juan Cadiñanos;Annachiara De Sandre-Giovannoli;Rafaëlle Bernard

  • Genotype and phenotype in patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency.

    A. B. van Kuilenburg;P. Vreken;N. G. Abeling;H. D. Bakker

  • Incidence of DNA repair deficiency disorders in western Europe: Xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy.

    Wim J. Kleijer;Vincent Laugel;Mark Berneburg;Tiziana Nardo

  • Genotype versus phenotype in families with androgen insensitivity syndrome.

    Annemie L. M. Boehmer;Annemie L. M. Boehmer;Hennie Brüggenwirth;Cissy van Assendelft;Barto J. Otten

  • First Reported Patient with Human ERCC1 Deficiency Has Cerebro-Oculo-Facio-Skeletal Syndrome with a Mild Defect in Nucleotide Excision Repair and Severe Developmental Failure

    Nicolaas G.J. Jaspers;Anja Raams;Margherita Cirillo Silengo;Nils Wijgers

  • Mutations in the gene encoding capillary morphogenesis protein 2 cause juvenile hyaline fibromatosis and infantile systemic hyalinosis.

    Sandra Hanks;Sarah Adams;Jenny Douglas;Laura Arbour

  • Molecular analysis of mutations in DNA polymerase η in xeroderma pigmentosum-variant patients

    Bernard C. Broughton;Agnes Cordonnier;Wim J. Kleijer;Nicolaas G. J. Jaspers

  • Inversion of the IDS gene resulting from recombination with IDS-related sequences is a common cause of the Hunter syndrome.

    Maire-Louise Bondeson;Niklas Dahl;Helena Malmgren;Wim J. Kleijer

  • Twenty-two novel mutations in the lysosomal alpha-glucosidase gene (GAA) underscore the genotype-phenotype correlation in glycogen storage disease type II.

    Monique M.P. Hermans;Dik van Leenen;Marian A. Kroos;Clare E. Beesley

  • Presence of ATM protein and residual kinase activity correlates with the phenotype in ataxia-telangiectasia: a genotype-phenotype study.

    Mijke M. M. Verhagen;Frans B. L. Hogervorst;Dominique F. C. M. Smeets

  • Clinical heterogeneity within xeroderma pigmentosum associated with mutations in the DNA repair and transcription gene ERCC3

    W. Vermeulen;R. J. Scott;S. Rodgers;H. J. Müller

  • Cerebro-oculo-facio-skeletal syndrome with a nucleotide excision-repair defect and a mutated XPD gene, with prenatal diagnosis in a triplet pregnancy.

    John M. Graham;Kwame Anyane-Yeboa;Anja Raams;Esther Appeldoorn

  • Mucopolysaccharidosis type I: identification of 8 novel mutations and determination of the frequency of the two common α-L-iduronidase mutations (W402X and Q70X) among European patients

    Bunge S;Kleijer Wj;Steglich C;Beck M

  • A temperature-sensitive disorder in basal transcription and DNA repair in humans

    Wim Vermeulen;Suzanne Rademakers;Nicolaas G.J. Jaspers;Esther Appeldoorn

  • Genetic heterogeneity of the excision repair defect associated with trichothiodystrophy.

    Miria Stefanini;Paola Lagomarsini;Silvia Giliani;Tiziana Nardo

  • Different Removal of Ultraviolet Photoproducts in Genetically Related Xeroderma Pigmentosum and Trichothiodystrophy Diseases

    Eric Eveno;François Bourre;Xavier Quilliet;Odile Chevallier-Lagente

  • Genotype-phenotype correlations in mucopolysaccharidosis type I using enzyme kinetics, immunoquantification and in vitro turnover studies.

    Susanna Bunge;Peter R. Clements;Sharon Byers;Wim J. Kleijer

  • Molecular basis of androgen insensitivity.

    H.T. Brüggenwirth;A.L.M. Boehmer;M.C.T. Verleun-Mooijman;T. Hoogenboezem

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicolaas G. J. Jaspers
Nicolaas G. J. Jaspers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ronald J.A. Wanders
Ronald J.A. Wanders University of Amsterdam
Arnold J. J. Reuser
Arnold J. J. Reuser Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dirk Bootsma
Dirk Bootsma Erasmus University Rotterdam
John J. Hopwood
John J. Hopwood University of Adelaide
Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers
Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ulf Pettersson
Ulf Pettersson Uppsala University
Alain Sarasin
Alain Sarasin Institut Gustave Roussy
Wim Vermeulen
Wim Vermeulen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Alan R. Lehmann
Alan R. Lehmann University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Genetics, there are several flexible online learning options to help you start or advance your career. Many students begin with programs related to healthcare and data management, such as medical coding programs. These provide a quick entry into the healthcare workforce, offering essential skills in medical records and billing.

For those seeking to complete their studies quickly, fast track school programs are available in various science and health disciplines. These programs condense coursework, allowing you to earn your degree faster and transition to the job market sooner.

Flexibility remains a key advantage in online education. Students looking for greater control over their schedules can explore self paced online college options. This approach is ideal for balancing studies with work or family commitments.

Finally, affordability and accessibility are important factors. Many accredited online universities offer programs without application fees, making it easier to get started on your educational journey in genetics or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Wim J. Kleijer

Recently Published Articles