World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
14474
World Ranking
7148
National Ranking
185

Arnold J. J. Reuser publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnold J. J. Reuser sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 200 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Arnold J. J. Reuser D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnold J. J. Reuser sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arnold J. J. Reuser is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans across multiple disciplines within medicine and life sciences, focusing significantly on lysosomal storage disorders and related biochemical pathways.

Reuser's work is situated mainly within the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their subfield expertise includes Physiology, Molecular Biology, and Rheumatology. The core topics explored in their publications involve:

  • Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Biochemical and Molecular Research
  • Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling
  • Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus

Their recent research contributions include two notable papers:

  • "Lentiviral Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gene Therapy Corrects Murine Pompe Disease," published in 2020 in Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
  • "Plain Language Summary: How The Pompe Registry Is Helping To Identify and Explain Gene Changes in Pompe Disease," published in 2022 in Future Rare Diseases

These publications reflect a targeted interest in Pompe disease, a subset of lysosomal storage disorders, with implications for gene therapy and patient registry use to better understand genetic variations.

Reuser frequently collaborates with a range of researchers across related fields. Regular co-authors include Merel Stok, Helen de Boer, Marshall W. Huston, Edwin H. Jacobs, and Onno Roovers. Their joint work contributes to both clinical and molecular perspectives on rare diseases.

Publication venues associated with Reuser's work highlight specialized journals in clinical development and rare diseases, specifically:

  • Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
  • Future Rare Diseases

Collectively, the scope of Reuser's scholarly output demonstrates a consistent focus on understanding disease mechanisms, developing therapeutic approaches, and improving knowledge dissemination in genetic and lysosomal disorders.

Best Publications

  • Pompe's disease.

    Ans T. van der Ploeg;Arnold J. J. Reuser

  • Interaction Between Hamartin and Tuberin, the TSC1 and TSC2 Gene Products

    Marjon van Slegtenhorst;Mark Nellist;Bas Nagelkerken;Jeremy Cheadle

  • The Natural Course of Infantile Pompe’s Disease: 20 Original Cases Compared With 133 Cases From the Literature

    Hannerieke M. P. van den Hout;Wim Hop;Otto P. van Diggelen;Jan A. M. Smeitink

  • Characterization and localization of the FMR-1 gene product associated with fragile X syndrome

    C. Verheij;C. E. Bakker;E. De Graaff;J. Keulemans

  • The natural course of non-classic Pompe's disease; a review of 225 published cases.

    Léon P F Winkel;Marloes L C Hagemans;Pieter A van Doorn;M Christa B Loonen

  • Recombinant human α-glucosidase from rabbit milk in Pompe patients

    Hannerieke Van den Hout;Arnold Jj Reuser;Arnold G Vulto;M Christa B Loonen

  • Structural and functional changes of lysosomal acid alpha-glucosidase during intracellular transport and maturation.

    H. A. Wisselaar;M. A. Kroos;M. M. P. Hermans;J. Van Beeumen

  • Primary structure and processing of lysosomal alpha-glucosidase; homology with the intestinal sucrase-isomaltase complex.

    L. H. Hoefsloot;M. Hoogeveen-Westerveld;M. A. Kroos;J. Van Beeumen

  • Glycogenosis type II (acid maltase deficiency)

    A. J. J. Reuser;M. A. Kroos;M. M. P. Hermans;A. G. A. Bijvoet

  • Broad spectrum of Pompe disease in patients with the same c.-32-13T→G haplotype

    M. A. Kroos;R. J. Pomponio;M. L. Hagemans;J.L.M. Keulemans

  • Generalized glycogen storage and cardiomegaly in a knockout mouse model of Pompe disease

    Agnes G.A. Bijvoet;Esther H.M. van de Kamp;Marian A. Kroos;Jia-Huan Ding

  • Twenty-two novel mutations in the lysosomal alpha-glucosidase gene (GAA) underscore the genotype-phenotype correlation in glycogen storage disease type II.

    Monique M.P. Hermans;Dik van Leenen;Marian A. Kroos;Clare E. Beesley

  • Update of the Pompe disease mutation database with 107 sequence variants and a format for severity rating

    Marian Kroos;Robert J. Pomponio;Laura van Vliet;Rachel E. Palmer

  • Characterization of the human lysosomal alpha-glucosidase gene.

    L H Hoefsloot;M Hoogeveen-Westerveld;A J J Reuser;B A Oostra

  • Biochemical, immunological, and cell genetic studies in glycogenosis type II.

    A J Reuser;J F Koster;A Hoogeveen;H Galjaard

  • Human Acid α-Glucosidase from Rabbit Milk Has Therapeutic Effect in Mice with Glycogen Storage Disease Type II

    Agnes G. A. Bijvoet;Hans Van Hirtum;Marian A. Kroos;Esther H. M. Van de Kamp

  • Clinical features and predictors for disease natural progression in adults with Pompe disease: a nationwide prospective observational study

    Nadine A. M. E. van der Beek;Nadine A. M. E. van der Beek;Juna M. de Vries;Juna M. de Vries;Marloes L. C. Hagemans;Wim C. J. Hop

  • The genotype-phenotype correlation in Pompe disease

    Marian Kroos;Marianne Hoogeveen-Westerveld;Ans van der Ploeg;Arnold J.J. Reuser

  • Recombinant Human Acid α-Glucosidase: High Level Production in Mouse Milk, Biochemical Characteristics, Correction of Enzyme Deficiency in GSDII KO Mice

    Agnes G. A. Bijvoet;Agnes G. A. Bijvoet;Marian A. Kroos;Frank R. Pieper;Martin Van der Vliet

  • TSC2 missense mutations inhibit tuberin phosphorylation and prevent formation of the tuberin–hamartin complex

    Mark Nellist;Brenda Verhaaf;Miriam A. Goedbloed;Arnold J.J. Reuser

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans Galjaard
Hans Galjaard Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ben A. Oostra
Ben A. Oostra Erasmus University Rotterdam
Wim C. J. Hop
Wim C. J. Hop Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dicky J. J. Halley
Dicky J. J. Halley Erasmus University Rotterdam
J. M. Tager
J. M. Tager University of Amsterdam
Rob Willemsen
Rob Willemsen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Edward I. Ginns
Edward I. Ginns University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Wim J. Kleijer
Wim J. Kleijer Erasmus University Rotterdam
John A. Barranger
John A. Barranger University of Pittsburgh
Lies H. Hoefsloot
Lies H. Hoefsloot Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Arnold J. J. Reuser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles