World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
71
Citations
50117
World Ranking
6483
National Ranking
3017

Nina Raben publications per year

1973: 2 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publications 1991: 1 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 5 publications
1973 2026

171 publications in total across all disciplines

Nina Raben publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Raben sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 155 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Nina Raben D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Raben sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nina Raben is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States and focuses primarily on research within the field of Medicine. Their research portfolio includes significant work in subfields such as Physiology, Rheumatology, Epidemiology, Organic Chemistry, and Genetics.

The main topics of research that Nina Raben has contributed to encompass a range of biomedical and biochemical areas. These include:

  • Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
  • Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
  • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Biochemical and Molecular Research
  • Trypanosoma Species Research and Implications
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research

Their publications are frequently found in a number of specialized venues, with multiple contributions in:

  • Molecular Genetics and Metabolism
  • Biomolecules
  • Clinical and Translational Medicine
  • EBioMedicine
  • Cell

Among recent papers associated with Nina Raben's work are the following:

  • "Pompe Disease: New Developments in an Old Lysosomal Storage Disorder," 2020, Biomolecules
  • "Impaired autophagy: The collateral damage of lysosomal storage disorders," 2020, EBioMedicine
  • "SnapShot: Lysosomal Storage Diseases," 2020, Cell
  • "Enzyme Replacement Therapy Can Reverse Pathogenic Cascade in Pompe Disease," 2020, Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
  • "Nutritional co-therapy with 1,3-butanediol and multi-ingredient antioxidants enhances autophagic clearance in Pompe disease," 2022, Molecular Genetics and Metabolism

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Nina Raben include:

  • Naresh Kumar Meena
  • Rosa Puertollano
  • Hung Do
  • Lan Weiss
  • Michele Carrer

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in higher eukaryotes

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Hagai Abeliovich;Patrizia Agostinis;Devendra K. Agrawal

  • Ancient missense mutations in a new member of the RoRet gene family are likely to cause familial Mediterranean fever

    I. Aksentijevich;M. Centola;Z. M. Deng;R. Sood

  • Ancient missense mutations in a new member of the RoRet gene family are likely to cause familial Mediterranean fever. The International FMF Consortium.

    N Zaks;JE Balow;E Mansfield;M. E. Mangelsdorf

  • Time of Onset of Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus and Genetic Variation in the β3-Adrenergic–Receptor Gene

    Jeremy Walston;Kristi Silver;Clifton Bogardus;William C. Knowler

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • The Nutrient-Responsive Transcription Factor TFE3 Promotes Autophagy, Lysosomal Biogenesis, and Clearance of Cellular Debris

    José A. Martina;Heba I. Diab;Li Lishu;Lim Jeong-A

  • Targeted disruption of pyrin, the FMF protein, causes heightened sensitivity to endotoxin and a defect in macrophage apoptosis.

    Jae Jin Chae;Hirsh D. Komarow;Jun Cheng;Geryl Wood

  • Suppression of autophagy in skeletal muscle uncovers the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins and their potential role in muscle damage in Pompe disease

    Nina Raben;Victoria Hill;Lauren Shea;Shoichi Takikita

  • Autophagy in lysosomal storage disorders

    Andrew P. Lieberman;Rosa Puertollano;Nina Raben;Susan Ann Slaugenhaupt

  • Dysfunction of endocytic and autophagic pathways in a lysosomal storage disease.

    Tokiko Fukuda;Lindsay Ewan;Martina Bauer;Robert J. Mattaliano

  • Activation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response in autoimmune myositis: Potential role in muscle fiber damage and dysfunction

    Kanneboyina Nagaraju;Livia Casciola-Rosen;Ingrid Lundberg;Rashmi Rawat

  • TFEB and TFE3: Linking Lysosomes to Cellular Adaptation to Stress*

    Nina Raben;Rosa Puertollano

  • Histidyl–tRNA Synthetase and Asparaginyl–tRNA Synthetase, Autoantigens in Myositis, Activate Chemokine Receptors on T Lymphocytes and Immature Dendritic Cells

    O.M. Zack Howard;Hui Fang Dong;De Yang;Nina Raben

  • Conditional up-regulation of MHC class I in skeletal muscle leads to self-sustaining autoimmune myositis and myositis-specific autoantibodies.

    Kanneboyina Nagaraju;Nina Raben;Lisa Loeffler;Tomasina Parker

  • Transcription factor EB (TFEB) is a new therapeutic target for Pompe disease

    Carmine Spampanato;Erin Feeney;Lishu Li;Monica Cardone

  • Acid alpha-glucosidase deficiency (glycogenosis type II, Pompe disease).

    Nina Raben;Paul Plotz;Barry J. Byrne

  • Targeted Disruption of the Acid α-Glucosidase Gene in Mice Causes an Illness with Critical Features of Both Infantile and Adult Human Glycogen Storage Disease Type II *

    Nina Raben;Kanneboyina Nagaraju;Eunice Lee;Paul Kessler

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul H. Plotz
Paul H. Plotz National Institutes of Health
Rosa Puertollano
Rosa Puertollano National Institutes of Health
Andrea Ballabio
Andrea Ballabio Baylor College of Medicine
Barry J. Byrne
Barry J. Byrne University of Florida
Sergio Lavandero
Sergio Lavandero University of Chile
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
Noboru Mizushima
Noboru Mizushima University of Tokyo
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Shazib Pervaiz
Shazib Pervaiz National University of Singapore
Steven Finkbeiner
Steven Finkbeiner University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Nina Raben

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles