World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William H. McCarthy

William H. McCarthy

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
72
Citations
16624
World Ranking
19884
National Ranking
678

William H. McCarthy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 216 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William H. McCarthy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William H. McCarthy is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their research spans multiple disciplinary fields, primarily Earth and Planetary Sciences and Neuroscience. Significant subfields include Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Paleontology, Atmospheric Science, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

Their scholarly work addresses a diverse array of topics such as Philosophy and Theoretical Science, Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Advanced Algebra and Logic, Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge, Stress Responses and Cortisol, and Nerve Injury and Regeneration.

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by William H. McCarthy are:

  • Modal Pluralism and Higher-Order Logic, 2022, Philosophical Perspectives
  • Chronic, but not sub-chronic, stress increases binge-like alcohol consumption in male and female c57BL6 mice, 2022, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neonatal selenium deficiency decreases selenoproteins in the lung and impairs pulmonary alveolar development, 2022, Free Radical Biology and Medicine
  • LATE ORDOVICIAN HIGH-PRESSURE REGIONAL METAMORPHISM IN SCOTLAND: CALEDONIAN OROGENESIS PREDATED THE CLOSURE OF IAPETUS, 2025, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • A Benacerraf problem for higher-order metaphysics, 2025, Noûs

William H. McCarthy frequently collaborates with a number of researchers. Colleagues with multiple joint publications include Thomas N. Lamont, Nick M.W. Roberts, Tobermory Mackay-Champion, M. P. Searle, and Justin Clarke-Doane.

Publication venues associated with their work reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their research and include Philosophical Perspectives, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, Free Radical Biology and Medicine, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America, and Noûs.

Best Publications

  • Early Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma: Revisiting the ABCD Criteria

    Naheed R. Abbasi;Helen M. Shaw;Darrell S. Rigel;Robert J. Friedman

  • Sentinel lymph node status as an indicator of the presence of metastatic melanoma in regional lymph nodes.

    J F Thompson;W H McCarthy;C M Bosch;C J O'Brien

  • Determinants of outcome in melanoma patients with cerebral metastases

    K.M. Fife;M.H. Colman;G.N. Stevens;I.C. Firth

  • Frequency and Morphologic Characteristics of Invasive Melanomas Lacking Specific Surface Microscopic Features

    Scott W. Menzies;Christian Ingvar;Kerry A. Crotty;William H. McCarthy

  • A comparison of prognostic factors and surgical results in 1,786 patients with localized (stage I) melanoma treated in Alabama, USA, and New South Wales, Australia.

    Charles M. Balch;Seng-jaw Soong;Gerald W. Milton;Helen M. Shaw

  • Surface microscopy of pigmented basal cell carcinoma.

    Scott W. Menzies;Karin Westerhoff;Harold Rabinovitz;Alfred W. Kopf

  • Prediction of potential metastatic sites in cutaneous head and neck melanoma using lymphoscintigraphy

    Christopher J. O'Brien;Roger F. Uren;John F. Thompson;Robert B. Howman-Giles

  • Desmoplastic and desmoplastic neurotropic melanoma: experience with 280 patients.

    Michael J. Quinn;Kerry A. Crotty;John F. Thompson;John F. Thompson;Alan S. Coates;Alan S. Coates

  • Lymphoscintigraphy in high-risk melanoma of the trunk: predicting draining node groups, defining lymphatic channels and locating the sentinel node.

    Roger F. Uren;Robert B. Howman-Giles;Helen M. Shaw;John F. Thompson

  • Short-term Digital Surface Microscopic Monitoring of Atypical or Changing Melanocytic Lesions

    Scott W. Menzies;Alex Gutenev;Michelle Avramidis;Andrew Batrac

  • A sensitivity and specificity analysis of the surface microscopy features of invasive melanoma.

    S W Menzies;C Ingvar;W H McCarthy

  • Experience with 998 cutaneous melanomas of the head and neck over 30 years.

    Christopher J. O'Brien;Alan S. Coates;Karin Petersen-Schaefer;Kerwin Shannon

  • The prognostic importance of tumor mitotic rate confirmed in 1317 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma and long follow-up.

    Anne Brecht Francken;Helen M. Shaw;John F. Thompson;Seng-jaw Soong

  • Location of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with cutaneous melanoma: new insights into lymphatic anatomy

    John F. Thompson;John F. Thompson;Roger F. Uren;Helen M. Shaw;Helen M. Shaw;William H. McCarthy;William H. McCarthy

  • Head and neck melanoma in 534 clinical Stage I patients. A prognostic factors analysis and results of surgical treatment.

    Marshall M. Urist;Charles M. Balch;Seng-Jaw Soong;Gerald W. Milton

  • IMMUNOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SOLARIUM EXPOSURE

    Peter Hersey;Enisa Hasic;Anne Edwards;Margot Bradley

  • Interval nodes: the forgotten sentinel nodes in patients with melanoma.

    Roger F. Uren;Robert Howman-Giles;John F. Thompson;William H. McCarthy

  • Immunocytochemical Analysis of the Cellular Infiltrate in Primary Regressing and Non-Regressing Malignant Melanoma

    Frances J Tefany;Ross Stc Barnetson;Gary M Halliday;Stanley W McCarthy

  • Increase in the sensitivity for melanoma diagnosis by primary care physicians using skin surface microscopy

    K. Westerhoff;W.H. Mccarthy;S.W. Menzies

  • Prophylactic lymph node dissection in clinical stage I cutaneous malignant melanoma: Results of surgical treatment in 1319 patients

    G. W. Milton;H. M. Shaw;W. H. McCarthy;L. Pearson

Frequent Co-Authors

John F. Thompson
John F. Thompson University of Sydney
Peter Hersey
Peter Hersey University of Sydney
Richard A. Scolyer
Richard A. Scolyer Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Alan S. Coates
Alan S. Coates University of Sydney
Charles M. Balch
Charles M. Balch The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Richard F. Kefford
Richard F. Kefford Macquarie University
Jack Cuzick
Jack Cuzick Queen Mary University of London
Anthony J. Swerdlow
Anthony J. Swerdlow Institute of Cancer Research
Andrew E. Grulich
Andrew E. Grulich University of New South Wales
Hugues Talbot
Hugues Talbot University of Paris-Saclay

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering options adjacent to studying Medicine in the USA? There are several flexible online degrees and career pathways that can help you enter or specialize in the healthcare field. For registered nurses hoping to become family nurse practitioners, rn to fnp bridge programs are designed for working professionals seeking to advance their clinical careers while studying online.

If you are interested in nutrition and want a science-based foundation, pursuing a bachelor's in nutrition online can open doors to careers in wellness, public health, and healthcare support. Aspiring leaders in healthcare systems should focus on how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs to ensure they choose accredited, reputable pathways that are valued by employers.

For RNs wanting to expand their qualifications without in-person practicums, there are online rn-bsn programs without clinicals that streamline the process. These varied online pathways allow for career growth, specialization, and leadership in health-focused fields—even outside traditional medical school.

Best Scientists Citing William H. McCarthy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles