World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 47 2709 2456 1311 1177 79 15468

Thomas F. Westbrook publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas F. Westbrook between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas F. Westbrook published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2023. 16 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2023. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 1 publication
2001 2026

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas F. Westbrook: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 0
2007 0
2008 3
2009 1
2010 0
2011 4
2012 6
2013 6
2014 6
2015 7
2016 10
2017 2
2018 8
2019 6
2020 6
2021 8
2022 4
2023 34
2024 28
2025 15
2026 1
Total 162
Download as CSV

Thomas F. Westbrook publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. Westbrook sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 77–86 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 79 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90 79
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas F. Westbrook D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. Westbrook sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121 47
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas F. Westbrook is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus also on Medicine. Within these broader areas, the scientist has contributed extensively to subfields including Molecular Biology, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cell Biology, and Cancer Research.

The topics frequently addressed in Westbrook's work include RNA modifications and cancer, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, Microtubule and mitosis dynamics, Cancer-related gene regulation, Protein Degradation and Inhibitors, and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways.

Westbrook's recent scholarly output features multiple publications across highly regarded journals. Selected papers include:

  • Energy-stress-mediated AMPK activation inhibits ferroptosis (2020) published in Nature Cell Biology
  • Proteogenomic Landscape of Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis and Targeted Therapy (2020) published in Cell
  • Spliceosome-targeted therapies trigger an antiviral immune response in triple-negative breast cancer (2021) published in Cell
  • Inhibition of YTHDF2 triggers proteotoxic cell death in MYC-driven breast cancer (2021) published in Molecular Cell
  • ZFTA-RELA Dictates Oncogenic Transcriptional Programs to Drive Aggressive Supratentorial Ependymoma (2021) published in Cancer Discovery

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Westbrook include Siddhartha Tyagi, Wesley L. Cai, Don X. Nguyen, Jitendra K. Meena, and Elizabeth A. Bowling. These partnerships have contributed to multiple projects and publications in cancer biology and molecular research.

The scientist has published frequently in major venues such as Cell, Cancer Discovery, Cancer Research, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Nature Cell Biology. These outlets reflect the interdisciplinary nature and high impact orientation of the research.

Best Publications

  • A Genome-wide RNAi Screen Identifies Multiple Synthetic Lethal Interactions with the Ras Oncogene

    Ji Luo;Michael J. Emanuele;Danan Li;Chad J. Creighton

  • A resource for large-scale RNA-interference-based screens in mammals

    Patrick J. Paddison;Jose M. Silva;Douglas S. Conklin;Douglas S. Conklin;Mike Schlabach;Mike Schlabach

  • Energy-stress-mediated AMPK activation inhibits ferroptosis.

    Hyemin Lee;Fereshteh Zandkarimi;Yilei Zhang;Jitendra Kumar Meena

  • Integrated Proteogenomic Characterization of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

    David J. Clark;Saravana M. Dhanasekaran;Francesca Petralia;Jianbo Pan

  • The pINDUCER lentiviral toolkit for inducible RNA interference in vitro and in vivo

    Kristen L. Meerbrey;Guang Hu;Jessica D. Kessler;Kevin Roarty

  • A Genetic Screen for Candidate Tumor Suppressors Identifies REST

    Thomas F. Westbrook;Eric S. Martin;Michael R. Schlabach;Yumei Leng

  • A Pan-Cancer Proteogenomic Atlas of PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway Alterations

    Yiqun Zhang;Patrick Kwok-Shing Ng;Melanie Kucherlapati;Fengju Chen

  • The spliceosome is a therapeutic vulnerability in MYC-driven cancer

    Tiffany Y.T. Hsu;Lukas M. Simon;Nicholas J. Neill;Richard Marcotte

  • A SUMOylation-dependent transcriptional subprogram is required for Myc-driven tumorigenesis.

    Jessica D. Kessler;Kristopher T. Kahle;Kristopher T. Kahle;Tingting Sun;Kristen L. Meerbrey

  • Cancer Proliferation Gene Discovery Through Functional Genomics

    Michael R. Schlabach;Ji Luo;Nicole L. Solimini;Guang Hu

  • MYC-driven accumulation of 2-hydroxyglutarate is associated with breast cancer prognosis

    Atsushi Terunuma;Nagireddy Putluri;Prachi Mishra;Ewy A. Mathé

  • The osteogenic niche promotes early-stage bone colonization of disseminated breast cancer cells.

    Hai Wang;Cuijuan Yu;Xia Gao;Thomas Welte

  • Proteogenomic Landscape of Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis and Targeted Therapy.

    Karsten Krug;Eric J. Jaehnig;Shankha Satpathy;Lili Blumenberg

  • An animal model of MYC-driven medulloblastoma.

    Yanxin Pei;Colin E. Moore;Jun Wang;Alok K. Tewari

  • Proteogenomic insights into the biology and treatment of HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

    Chen Huang;Lijun Chen;Sara R. Savage;Rodrigo Vargas Eguez

  • SCFbeta-TRCP controls oncogenic transformation and neural differentiation through REST degradation.

    Thomas F. Westbrook;Thomas F. Westbrook;Guang Hu;Xiaolu L. Ang;Peter Mulligan

  • Proteogenomic Characterization of Endometrial Carcinoma.

    Yongchao Dou;Emily A. Kawaler;Daniel Cui Zhou;Marina A. Gritsenko

  • Immuno-subtyping of breast cancer reveals distinct myeloid cell profiles and immunotherapy resistance mechanisms.

    Ik Sun Kim;Yang Gao;Thomas Welte;Hai Wang

  • Activation of multiple proto-oncogenic tyrosine kinases in breast cancer via loss of the PTPN12 phosphatase.

    Tingting Sun;Nicola Aceto;Kristen L. Meerbrey;Jessica D. Kessler

  • Enhancer invasion shapes MYCN-dependent transcriptional amplification in neuroblastoma.

    Rhamy Zeid;Matthew A. Lawlor;Evon Poon;Jaime M. Reyes

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen J. Elledge
Stephen J. Elledge Harvard University
Chad A. Shaw
Chad A. Shaw Baylor College of Medicine
Rachel Schiff
Rachel Schiff Baylor College of Medicine
Chad J. Creighton
Chad J. Creighton Baylor College of Medicine
Jeffrey M. Rosen
Jeffrey M. Rosen Baylor College of Medicine
Juan Botas
Juan Botas Baylor College of Medicine
Michael T. Lewis
Michael T. Lewis Baylor College of Medicine
Susan G. Hilsenbeck
Susan G. Hilsenbeck Baylor College of Medicine
C. Kent Osborne
C. Kent Osborne Baylor College of Medicine
Maciej Wiznerowicz
Maciej Wiznerowicz Poznan University of Medical Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Molecular Biology can open doors to diverse fields within healthcare, research, and even education. Many students interested in life sciences also consider expanding their expertise through flexible online programs. For example, earning a clinical psychology degree online can help individuals apply knowledge of biology to mental health and behavioral sciences.

If you are interested in community work or social support systems, an online human services degree provides foundational skills for roles in counseling, case management, and advocacy. Meanwhile, educators with a biology background may choose to advance their careers by learning teacher to speech pathologist pathways, which blend communication sciences with biological knowledge.

Additionally, those interested in designing science labs or medical facilities may benefit from pursuing an architecture degree online. Each pathway offers unique opportunities for applying molecular biology skills in new and impactful ways.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas F. Westbrook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles