World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
51597
World Ranking
11076
National Ranking
5697

Stephan D. Fihn publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan D. Fihn sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 330 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stephan D. Fihn D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan D. Fihn sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephan D. Fihn is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and has made substantial contributions to the fields of medicine and health professions. Their research output includes a focus on general health professions, economics and econometrics, clinical psychology, infectious diseases, and epidemiology.

Their work covers a range of topics, primarily addressing issues related to primary care and health outcomes, healthcare policy and management, as well as healthcare cost, quality, and practices. Additionally, Fihn's research engages with COVID-19 clinical research studies, long-term effects of COVID-19, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, and broader COVID-19-related healthcare impacts.

Frequent co-authors of Stephan D. Fihn include:

  • Frederick P. Rivara
  • Karin M. Nelson
  • Eli N. Perencevich
  • Roy H. Perlis

Fihn's publications have appeared predominantly in journals such as JAMA Network Open, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Healthcare, JAMA Internal Medicine, and JAMA. Within these venues, they have contributed 24 papers to JAMA Network Open, four to the Journal of General Internal Medicine, and multiple others in Healthcare and JAMA series journals.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Stephan D. Fihn include:

  • "Caution Needed on the Use of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine for Coronavirus Disease 2019" (2020, JAMA Network Open)

This publication is among the more cited works within their portfolio, reflecting research related to COVID-19 therapeutics.

Other relevant recent papers in the related field authored by frequent coauthor Roy H. Perlis contribute contextual insight into the clinical research landscape:

  • "Evaluating the Application of Large Language Models in Clinical Research Contexts" (2023, JAMA Network Open)
  • "Reporting Clinical Studies Affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic: Guidelines for Authors" (2021, JAMA Network Open)

These demonstrate engagement with both clinical research methodology and emerging technologies in healthcare research.

Best Publications

  • The AUDIT Alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C) : An effective brief screening test for problem drinking

    Kristen Bush;Daniel R. Kivlahan;Mary B. McDonell;Stephan D. Fihn

  • 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

    Stephan D. Fihn;Julius M. Gardin;Jonathan Abrams;Kathleen Berra

  • ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina)

    Raymond J. Gibbons;Jonathan Abrams;Kanu Chatterjee;Jennifer Daley

  • 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Glenn N. Levine;Eric R. Bates;John A. Bittl;Ralph G. Brindis

  • Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease

    John A. Spertus;Jennifer A. Winder;Timothy A. Dewhurst;Richard A. Deyo

  • Risk of Adverse Outcomes Associated With Concomitant Use of Clopidogrel and Proton Pump Inhibitors Following Acute Coronary Syndrome

    P. Michael Ho;Thomas M. Maddox;Li Wang;Stephan D. Fihn

  • 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease : A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons

    Stephan D. Fihn;James C. Blankenship;Karen P. Alexander;John A. Bittl

  • Risk Factors for Complications of Chronic Anticoagulation: A Multicenter Study

    Stephan D. Fihn;Mary McDonell;Donald Martin;Jorja Henikoff

  • ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina).

    Raymond J. Gibbons;Kanu Chatterjee;Jennifer Daley;John S. Douglas

  • 2007 Chronic Angina Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Group to Develop the Focused Update of the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina

    Theodore D. Fraker;Stephan D. Fihn

  • Predicting Mortality and Healthcare Utilization with a Single Question

    Karen B. DeSalvo;Vincent S. Fan;Mary B. McDonell;Stephan D. Fihn

  • The Risk for and Severity of Bleeding Complications in Elderly Patients Treated with Warfarin

    Stephan D. Fihn;Catherine M. Callahan;Donald C. Martin;Mary B. McDonell

  • A general method of compliance assessment using centralized pharmacy records. Description and validation.

    John F. Steiner;Thomas D. Koepsell;Stephan D. Fihn;Thomas S. Inui

  • Does This Woman Have an Acute Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection

    Stephen Bent;Brahmajee K. Nallamothu;David L. Simel;Stephan D. Fihn

  • Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease.

    John A. Spertus;Jennifer A. Winder;Jennifer A. Winder;Timothy A. Dewhurst;Timothy A. Dewhurst;Richard A. Deyo;Richard A. Deyo

  • Health Status Predicts Long-Term Outcome in Outpatients With Coronary Disease

    John A. Spertus;Philip Jones;Mary McDonell;Vincent Fan

  • Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Risk of Myocardial Infarction

    Thomas M. Maddox;Maggie A. Stanislawski;Gary K. Grunwald;Gary K. Grunwald;Steven M. Bradley

  • Screening for problem drinking : Comparison of CAGE and AUDIT.

    Katharine A. Bradley;Kristen R. Bush;Mary B. McDonell;Timothy Malone

  • 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

    Glenn N. Levine;Eric R. Bates;John A. Bittl;Ralph G. Brindis

  • 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Executive Summary

    Stephan D. Fihn;Julius M. Gardin;Jonathan Abrams;Kathleen Berra

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Maynard
Charles Maynard University of Washington
John S. Rumsfeld
John S. Rumsfeld University of Colorado Denver
Edward J. Boyko
Edward J. Boyko University of Washington
Walter E. Stamm
Walter E. Stamm University of Washington
Frederick P. Rivara
Frederick P. Rivara University of Washington
William M. Tierney
William M. Tierney The University of Texas at Austin
Julius M. Gardin
Julius M. Gardin Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Morris Weinberger
Morris Weinberger University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
John A. Spertus
John A. Spertus University of Missouri–Kansas City

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine extends far beyond medical school. Numerous online degrees can offer entry into key healthcare fields, each with unique opportunities and requirements. For those interested in administrative roles, pursuing a health administration degree online can lead to leadership positions in hospitals or clinics.

Hands-on patient care remains vital, and there are nursing programs without TEAS that make it easier for aspiring nurses to get started, bypassing some of the usual standardized testing barriers.

Those interested in supporting the healthcare system through essential technical skills can benefit from enrolling in the best online medical billing and coding schools. These programs prepare students for in-demand, flexible careers.

For registered nurses looking to advance, specialized bridge programs like ASN to FNP programs provide a direct route to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner through accelerated coursework.

Each of these online pathways offers flexibility, career mobility, and a chance to make a meaningful impact in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Stephan D. Fihn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles