World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 60 1979 1780 136 127 98 11471

Stefan Joos publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stefan Joos between 1988 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stefan Joos published across 36 years, from 1988 to 2023, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2005. 10 of the 120 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2005. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 10 publications
1988 2023

120 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stefan Joos: publications per year, 1988 to 2023
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 2
1993 2
1994 4
1995 9
1996 8
1997 4
1998 5
1999 5
2000 4
2001 2
2002 7
2003 9
2004 4
2005 10
2006 8
2007 7
2008 3
2009 3
2010 7
2011 1
2012 0
2013 2
2014 0
2015 1
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 10
Total 120
Download as CSV

Stefan Joos publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Joos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 98 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131 98
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Stefan Joos D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Joos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120 60
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Stefan Joos is affiliated with the German Cancer Research Center in Germany. Their work is connected to this prominent research institution, which indicates a focus on cancer-related scientific activities and biomedical research.

There are no documented recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues available for Stefan Joos. Similarly, no specific fields, subfields, or main topics of study have been listed, nor are there records of book publications or awards.

The absence of detailed publication data suggests that publicly accessible academic outputs or records may be limited or not cataloged in the provided sources. However, affiliation with the German Cancer Research Center positions Stefan Joos within an environment dedicated to advancing understanding of cancer biology and treatment.

Best Publications

  • The role of Bcl-2 family members in tumorigenesis.

    Vladimir Kirkin;Stefan Joos;Martin Zörnig

  • Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization

    Stanislas du Manoir;Michael R. Speicher;Stefan Joos;Evelin Schröck

  • BRAF gene duplication constitutes a mechanism of MAPK pathway activation in low-grade astrocytomas

    Stefan Pfister;Wibke G. Janzarik;Marc Remke;Aurélie Ernst

  • Primary mediastinal (thymic) B-cell lymphoma is characterized by gains of chromosomal material including 9p and amplification of the REL gene

    S Joos;MI Otano-Joos;S Ziegler;S Bruderlein

  • Genomic imbalances including amplification of the tyrosine kinase gene JAK2 in CD30+ Hodgkin cells

    Stefan Joos;M Küpper;S Ohl;F von Bonin

  • Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization

    Stanislas du Manoir;Evelin Schröck;Martin Bentz;Michael R. Speicher

  • Outcome prediction in pediatric medulloblastoma based on DNA copy-number aberrations of chromosomes 6q and 17q and the MYC and MYCN loci

    Stefan Pfister;Marc Remke;Axel Benner;Frank Mendrzyk

  • Classical Hodgkin lymphoma is characterized by recurrent copy number gains of the short arm of chromosome 2.

    Stefan Joos;Christiane K. Menz;Gunnar Wrobel;Reiner Siebert

  • HMGB1 inhibits cell death in yeast and mammalian cells and is abundantly expressed in human breast carcinoma

    Marie Luise Brezniceanu;Kirsten Völp;Susanne Bösser;Christine Solbach

  • Genomic and Protein Expression Profiling Identifies CDK6 As Novel Independent Prognostic Marker in Medulloblastoma

    Frank Mendrzyk;Bernhard Radlwimmer;Stefan Joos;Felix Kokocinski

  • Tissue Microarray Analysis Reveals Site-specific Prevalence of Oncogene Amplifications in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

    Kolja Freier;Stefan Joos;Christa Flechtenmacher;Frauke Devens

  • Gains of 2p involving the REL locus correlate with nuclear c-Rel protein accumulation in neoplastic cells of classical Hodgkin lymphoma

    Thomas F.E. Barth;José I. Martin-Subero;Stefan Joos;Christiane K. Menz

  • Recurrent FGFR1 amplification and high FGFR1 protein expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

    Kolja Freier;Carsten Schwaenen;Carsten Sticht;Christa Flechtenmacher

  • Increased expression of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is associated with an elevated level of the antiapoptotic c‐IAP2 protein in human colon carcinomas

    Kirsten Völp;Marie-Luise Brezniceanu;Susanne Bösser;Thomas Brabletz

  • Hodgkin's lymphoma cell lines are characterized by frequent aberrations on chromosomes 2p and 9p including REL and JAK2

    Stefan Joos;Martin Granzow;Heidi Holtgreve-Grez;Reiner Siebert

  • Recurrent Chromosomal Imbalances Detected in Biopsy Material from Oral Premalignant and Malignant Lesions by Combined Tissue Microdissection, Universal DNA Amplification, and Comparative Genomic Hybridization

    Ruthild G. Weber;Martin Scheer;Martin Scheer;I. Antonio Born;I. Antonio Born;Stefan Joos

  • Comparative genomic hybridization in chronic B-cell leukemias shows a high incidence of chromosomal gains and losses

    M Bentz;K Huck;S du Manoir;S Joos

  • Molecular analysis of childhood primitive neuroectodermal tumors defines markers associated with poor outcome

    W G Scheurlen;G C Schwabe;S Joos;J Mollenhauer

  • Microarray-based Copy Number and Expression Profiling in Dedifferentiated and Pleomorphic Liposarcoma

    Björn Fritz;Falk Schubert;Gunnar Wrobel;Carsten Schwaenen

  • Microarray-Based Screening for Molecular Markers in Medulloblastoma Revealed STK15 as Independent Predictor for Survival

    Kai Neben;Andrey Korshunov;Axel Benner;Gunnar Wrobel

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Lichter
Peter Lichter German Cancer Research Center
Hartmut Döhner
Hartmut Döhner University of Ulm
Bernhard Radlwimmer
Bernhard Radlwimmer German Cancer Research Center
Axel Benner
Axel Benner German Cancer Research Center
Guido Reifenberger
Guido Reifenberger Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Thomas F. E. Barth
Thomas F. E. Barth University of Ulm
Reiner Siebert
Reiner Siebert University of Ulm
Roland Penzel
Roland Penzel University Hospital Heidelberg
Georg W. Bornkamm
Georg W. Bornkamm Technical University of Munich
Thomas Cremer
Thomas Cremer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in molecular biology opens the door to a range of online degrees and career paths. Many students explore interdisciplinary programs, which can be both flexible and affordable. For those evaluating budgets and admissions requirements, see details on online interdisciplinary studies admissions and costs.

Molecular biology also supports careers in research, education, or even fields like history, where scientific methods meet humanities scholarship. Those interested in broadening academic expertise may benefit from pursuing an online history master's degree.

Information management is another valuable skill for biology graduates. The cost of mlis degree us has become more manageable with the growing number of online library science programs—supporting roles in data curation and research support.

For those drawn to healthcare, communication sciences may be appealing. Accredited, flexible options such as asha approved online speech pathology programs make it easier to qualify as a speech-language pathologist while studying remotely.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Joos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles