World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Shinji Naganawa

Shinji Naganawa

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
19771
World Ranking
18832
National Ranking
604

Shinji Naganawa publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shinji Naganawa sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 552 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Shinji Naganawa D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shinji Naganawa sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere's disease

    Tsutomu Nakashima;Shinji Naganawa;Makoto Sugiura;Masaaki Teranishi

  • Evaluation of glymphatic system activity with the diffusion MR technique: diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) in Alzheimer’s disease cases

    Toshiaki Taoka;Yoshitaka Masutani;Hisashi Kawai;Toshiki Nakane

  • Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate.

    Chiho Sato;Shinji Naganawa;Tatsuya Nakamura;Hisashi Kumada

  • Grading of endolymphatic hydrops using magnetic resonance imaging

    Tsutomu Nakashima;Shinji Naganawa;Ilmari Pyykkö;William P.R. Gibson

  • Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix.

    Shinji Naganawa;Chiho Sato;Hisashi Kumada;Takeo Ishigaki

  • Disorders of cochlear blood flow.

    Tsutomu Nakashima;Shinji Naganawa;Michihiko Sone;Mitsuo Tominaga

  • Meniere's disease.

    Tsutomu Nakashima;Ilmari Pyykkö;Megan A. Arroll;Margaretha L. Casselbrant

  • Ménière's disease: a reappraisal supported by a variable latency of symptoms and the MRI visualisation of endolymphatic hydrops

    Ilmari Pyykkö;Tsutomu Nakashima;Tadao Yoshida;Jing Zou

  • Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: technical challenges and prospects for the future.

    Shinji Naganawa;Hisashi Kawai;Hiroshi Fukatsu;Yasuo Sakurai

  • Cognitive impairments in multiple system atrophy MSA-C vs MSA-P

    Y. Kawai;M. Suenaga;A. Takeda;M. Ito

  • Separate visualization of endolymphatic space, perilymphatic space and bone by a single pulse sequence; 3D-inversion recovery imaging utilizing real reconstruction after intratympanic Gd-DTPA administration at 3 Tesla

    Shinji Naganawa;Hiroko Satake;Minako Kawamura;Hiroshi Fukatsu

  • Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops in Ménière's disease with single-dose intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media using heavily T(2)-weighted 3D-FLAIR.

    Shinji Naganawa;Masahiro Yamazaki;Hisashi Kawai;Kiminori Bokura

  • Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops with MR imaging in patients with Ménière’s disease and related pathologies: current status of its methods and clinical significance

    Shinji Naganawa;Tsutomu Nakashima

  • Endolymphatic hydrops and blood–labyrinth barrier in Ménière's disease

    Mitsuhiko Tagaya;Masahiro Yamazaki;Masaaki Teranishi;Shinji Naganawa

  • Three-Dimensional Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings and Prognosis in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss†

    Tadao Yoshida;Makoto Sugiura;Shinji Naganawa;Masaaki Teranishi

  • Contralateral and ipsilateral responses in primary somatosensory cortex following electrical median nerve stimulation--an fMRI study.

    Takashi Nihashi;Shinji Naganawa;Chiho Sato;Hisashi Kawai

  • Penetration and distribution of gadolinium-based contrast agents into the cerebrospinal fluid in healthy rats: a potential pathway of entry into the brain tissue.

    Gregor Jost;Thomas Frenzel;Jessica Lohrke;Diana Constanze Lenhard

  • Imaging of Ménière's Disease after Intravenous Administration of Single-dose Gadodiamide: Utility of Subtraction Images with Different Inversion Time

    Shinji Naganawa;Masahiro Yamazaki;Hisashi Kawai;Kiminori Bokura

  • MR cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional fast asymmetrical spin-echo and three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady-state sequences.

    Shinji Naganawa;Tokiko Koshikawa;Hiroshi Fukatsu;Takeo Ishigaki

  • Observation of contrast enhancement in the cochlear fluid space of healthy subjects using a 3D-FLAIR sequence at 3 Tesla

    Shinji Naganawa;Tomomi Komada;Hiroshi Fukatsu;Takeo Ishigaki

Frequent Co-Authors

Gen Sobue
Gen Sobue Aichi Medical University
Masahisa Katsuno
Masahisa Katsuno Nagoya University
Fumiaki Tanaka
Fumiaki Tanaka Yokohama City University
Norio Ozaki
Norio Ozaki Nagoya University
Masato Nagino
Masato Nagino Nagoya University
Minoru Hoshiyama
Minoru Hoshiyama Nagoya University
Seiichi Yamamoto
Seiichi Yamamoto Doshisha University
Fumitaka Kikkawa
Fumitaka Kikkawa Nagoya University
Yoshinori Hasegawa
Yoshinori Hasegawa Nagoya University
Hidenori Suzuki
Hidenori Suzuki Nippon Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine opens doors to a variety of rewarding fields beyond traditional physician roles. Many students are now considering alternative healthcare careers that can be started or advanced online.

For example, pursuing a pharmacy career is possible through online programs. Prospective students often compare online pharmacy school cost to find affordable options while maintaining accreditation standards.

Another fast-growing field is managing patient data. An online health information management degree offers flexible study for those interested in healthcare administration and technology.

Medical billing and coding is also an essential part of the healthcare workforce. If you’re interested in this path, you can research medical billing and coding certification cost to find budget-friendly certification programs.

Nursing continues to be in high demand, and many now opt for low-cost cheap np programs (nurse practitioner) for career advancement with greater flexibility.

Whether you want to work directly with patients or play a key role behind the scenes, these online options make healthcare careers more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Shinji Naganawa

Trending Scientists