World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
16687
World Ranking
3381
National Ranking
1638

Abraham Kandel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abraham Kandel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 455 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Abraham Kandel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abraham Kandel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - ACM Fellow For original research contributions advancing the state-of-the-art in applied fuzzy sets, fuzzy expert systems, and fuzzy hybrid systems.
  • 1995 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Abraham Kandel is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their recent research includes a publication titled Digital Transformation and Bank Performance: Exploring the Relationship in the Nepalese Banking Sector, published in 2025 in the NPRC Journal of Multidisciplinary Research.

The following publication venues are associated with their work:

  • NPRC Journal of Multidisciplinary Research.

Frequent co-authors are not recorded in the available data.

Abraham Kandel has been recognized with the following awards:

  • ACM Fellow (1998): For original research contributions advancing the state-of-the-art in applied fuzzy sets, fuzzy expert systems, and fuzzy hybrid systems.
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1995)

Best Publications

  • Complex fuzzy sets

    D. Ramot;R. Milo;M. Friedman;A. Kandel

  • Fuzzy Mathematical Techniques With Applications

    Abraham Kandel

  • Fuzzy Expert Systems

    Abraham Kandel

  • Fuzzy linear systems

    Unknown

  • Complex fuzzy logic

    D. Ramot;M. Friedman;G. Langholz;A. Kandel

  • Numerical solutions of fuzzy differential and integral equations

    Menahem Friedman;Ming Ma;Abraham Kandel

  • Fuzzy techniques in pattern recognition

    Abraham Kandel

  • Genetic-based new fuzzy reasoning models with application to fuzzy control

    D. Park;A. Kandel;G. Langholz

  • A new fuzzy arithmetic

    Ming Ma;Menahem Friedman;Abraham Kandel

  • Knowledge discovery in time series databases

    Y. Klein;A. Kandel

  • Fuzzy linear regression and its applications to forecasting in uncertain environment

    Behrooz Heshmaty;Abraham Kandel

  • Introduction To Pattern Recognition: Statistical, Structural, Neural And Fuzzy Logic Approaches

    Menahem Friedman;Abraham Kandel

  • Implementing imprecision in information systems

    Maria Zemankova;Abraham Kandel

  • Duality in fuzzy linear systems

    Ming Ma;M. Friedman;A. Kandel

  • Fuzzy sets, fuzzy algebra, and fuzzy statistics

    Unknown

  • Automatic construction of FCMs

    M. Schneider;E. Shnaider;A. Kandel;G. Chew

  • Graph-Theoretic Techniques for Web Content Mining

    Adam Schenker;Horst Bunke;Abraham Kandel

  • Compensatory neurofuzzy systems with fast learning algorithms

    Yan-Qing Zhang;A. Kandel

  • Fuzzy relational data bases: A key to expert systems

    Maria Zemankova-Leech;Abraham Kandel

  • Information-theoretic algorithm for feature selection

    Abraham Kandel;Oded Maimon

  • Data Mining in Time Series Databases

    Horst Bunke;Abraham Kandel

  • On complex fuzzy sets

    D. Ramot;M. Friedman;G. Langholz;R. Milo

Frequent Co-Authors

Horst Bunke
Horst Bunke University of Bern
Yan-Qing Zhang
Yan-Qing Zhang Georgia State University
Lawrence O. Hall
Lawrence O. Hall University of South Florida
Yuval Elovici
Yuval Elovici Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Bracha Shapira
Bracha Shapira Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
I.B. Turksen
I.B. Turksen University of Toronto
Oded Maimon
Oded Maimon Tel Aviv University
Xiaoyi Jiang
Xiaoyi Jiang University of Münster
Yiyu Yao
Yiyu Yao University of Regina
Lakhmi C. Jain
Lakhmi C. Jain University of South Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s helpful to consider alternative and related educational pathways. Online degrees now offer the flexibility and variety needed to fit different goals and backgrounds. For individuals seeking quick entry into the workforce or wanting to build foundational skills, online associates degrees provide a practical starting point in tech.

Many students are also concerned about cost and accessibility. Luckily, there are options like cheap online degrees fast, making it possible to gain credentials without overwhelming debt and on an accelerated timeline.

For those looking at advanced credentials, certain tech and STEM graduate programs are among the most in demand masters degrees. These can open doors to higher salaries and specialized roles in computing.

Lastly, not all online colleges require perfect academic records. There are online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa, ensuring that even students with lower GPAs can access quality education and new opportunities in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Abraham Kandel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles