World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 71 1340 1193 13 12 122 39209

Shalev Itzkovitz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shalev Itzkovitz between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shalev Itzkovitz published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2023. 15 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2023. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 49 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
2002 2025

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shalev Itzkovitz: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 4
2004 9
2005 3
2006 6
2007 3
2008 9
2009 2
2010 2
2011 5
2012 7
2013 4
2014 3
2015 4
2016 10
2017 9
2018 17
2019 5
2020 12
2021 17
2022 11
2023 49
2024 6
2025 9
Total 207
Download as CSV

Shalev Itzkovitz publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shalev Itzkovitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 117–126 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 122 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177 122
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Shalev Itzkovitz D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shalev Itzkovitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106 71
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Shalev Itzkovitz is affiliated with the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel and focuses their research primarily in the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions also in medicine. Their work spans several subfields including molecular biology, genetics, surgery, immunology, and epidemiology.

The scientist's main topics of research encompass single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, pancreatic function and diabetes, liver physiology and pathology, gut microbiota and health, digestive system and related health, infant nutrition and health, and inflammatory bowel disease.

Recent publications by Shalev Itzkovitz include:

  • Lactate released by inflammatory bone marrow neutrophils induces their mobilization via endothelial GPR81 signaling (2020, Nature Communications)
  • The spatiotemporal program of zonal liver regeneration following acute injury (2022, Cell Stem Cell)
  • A single cell atlas of the human liver tumor microenvironment (2020, Molecular Systems Biology)
  • Diet Diurnally Regulates Small Intestinal Microbiome-Epithelial-Immune Homeostasis and Enteritis (2020, Cell)
  • Lgr5+ telocytes are a signaling source at the intestinal villus tip (2020, Nature Communications)

Their frequent co-authors include Keren Bahar Halpern, Adi Egozi, Shani Ben-Moshe, Yotam Harnik, and Ido Amit. The frequency of collaboration ranges from 33 publications with Keren Bahar Halpern to 12 with Ido Amit.

Shalev Itzkovitz's publications are often found in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Communications, Molecular Systems Biology, and Nature Metabolism. Among these, they have the most publications in Zenodo and bioRxiv.

Best Publications

  • Network Motifs: Simple Building Blocks of Complex Networks

    R. Milo;S. Shen-Orr;S. Itzkovitz;N. Kashtan

  • A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer’s Disease

    Hadas Keren-Shaul;Amit Spinrad;Assaf Weiner;Assaf Weiner;Orit Matcovitch-Natan

  • Superfamilies of evolved and designed networks.

    Ron Milo;Shalev Itzkovitz;Nadav Kashtan;Reuven Levitt

  • Personalized Gut Mucosal Colonization Resistance to Empiric Probiotics Is Associated with Unique Host and Microbiome Features

    Niv Zmora;Niv Zmora;Gili Zilberman-Schapira;Jotham Suez;Uria Mor

  • Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome

    Ronen Zaidel-Bar;Shalev Itzkovitz;Avi Ma'ayan;Ravi Iyengar

  • Post-Antibiotic Gut Mucosal Microbiome Reconstitution Is Impaired by Probiotics and Improved by Autologous FMT.

    Jotham Suez;Niv Zmora;Niv Zmora;Gili Zilberman-Schapira;Uria Mor

  • Slug and Sox9 Cooperatively Determine the Mammary Stem Cell State

    Wenjun Guo;Zuzana Keckesova;Joana Liu Donaher;Tsukasa Shibue

  • A comprehensive library of fluorescent transcriptional reporters for Escherichia coli

    Alon Zaslaver;Anat Bren;Michal Ronen;Shalev Itzkovitz

  • Single-cell spatial reconstruction reveals global division of labour in the mammalian liver

    Keren Bahar Halpern;Rom Shenhav;Orit Matcovitch-Natan;Beáta Tóth

  • The Lgr5 intestinal stem cell signature: robust expression of proposed quiescent ‘+4’ cell markers

    Javier Muñoz;Daniel E Stange;Arnout G Schepers;Marc van de Wetering

  • Oscillations and variability in the p53 system

    Naama Geva-Zatorsky;Nitzan Rosenfeld;Shalev Itzkovitz;Ron Milo

  • Efficient sampling algorithm for estimating subgraph concentrations and detecting network motifs

    N. Kashtan;S. Itzkovitz;R. Milo;U. Alon

  • Network motifs in integrated cellular networks of transcription-regulation and protein-protein interaction.

    Esti Yeger-Lotem;Shmuel Sattath;Nadav Kashtan;Shalev Itzkovitz

  • The Spectrum and Regulatory Landscape of Intestinal Innate Lymphoid Cells Are Shaped by the Microbiome

    Meital Gury-BenAri;Christoph A. Thaiss;Nicolas Serafini;Nicolas Serafini;Deborah R. Winter

  • Subepithelial telocytes are an important source of Wnts that supports intestinal crypts

    Michal Shoshkes-Carmel;Yue J Wang;Kirk J Wangensteen;Beáta Tóth

  • Lung Single-Cell Signaling Interaction Map Reveals Basophil Role in Macrophage Imprinting

    Merav Cohen;Amir Giladi;Anna-Dorothea Gorki;Dikla Gelbard Solodkin

  • On the uniform generation of random graphs with prescribed degree sequences

    R. Milo;N. Kashtan;S. Itzkovitz;M. E. J. Newman

  • Single-molecule transcript counting of stem-cell markers in the mouse intestine

    Shalev Itzkovitz;Anna Lyubimova;Anna Lyubimova;Irene C. Blat;Mindy Maynard

  • The incoherent feed-forward loop accelerates the response-time of the gal system of Escherichia coli.

    S. Mangan;S. Itzkovitz;A. Zaslaver;U. Alon

  • Spatial heterogeneity in the mammalian liver

    Shani Ben-Moshe;Shalev Itzkovitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Uri Alon
Uri Alon Weizmann Institute of Science
Ron Milo
Ron Milo Weizmann Institute of Science
Ido Amit
Ido Amit Weizmann Institute of Science
Alexander van Oudenaarden
Alexander van Oudenaarden University Medical Center Utrecht
Ehud Shapiro
Ehud Shapiro Weizmann Institute of Science
Eyal David
Eyal David Weizmann Institute of Science
Eran Segal
Eran Segal Weizmann Institute of Science
Axel Visel
Axel Visel Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Eran Elinav
Eran Elinav Weizmann Institute of Science
Karl Skorecki
Karl Skorecki Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career pathways. Alongside laboratory-based work, many professionals branch into fields like education, clinical research, or counseling. For those interested in the psychological aspects of biology, child psychology degrees online offer a flexible path to combine molecular insights with behavioral studies.

Those seeking broader clinical or advisory roles may benefit from an online master's degree in counseling or pursue an online master in clinical psychology. Both programs equip graduates with skills to support individuals affected by genetic disorders or mental health challenges linked to biological factors.

If your interests lean toward advocacy or social impact, earning a human services bachelors degree online can prepare you for roles that bridge science with community support. These related degrees offer flexible, affordable options to deepen your expertise and expand your impact beyond the laboratory.

Best Scientists Citing Shalev Itzkovitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles