World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 4845 4487 2295 2088 139 37310

Sankar Sen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sankar Sen between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sankar Sen published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2011. 16 of the 158 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2011. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 8 publications
1985 2025

158 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sankar Sen: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 0
1991 2
1992 1
1993 3
1994 2
1995 1
1996 4
1997 1
1998 3
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 2
2003 1
2004 2
2005 1
2006 1
2007 5
2008 5
2009 4
2010 19
2011 20
2012 3
2013 7
2014 5
2015 11
2016 4
2017 6
2018 4
2019 6
2020 2
2021 0
2022 2
2023 5
2024 8
2025 8
Total 158
Download as CSV

Sankar Sen publications per year - data summary

  • Sankar Sen, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from City University of New York, has 158 publications recorded across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1985 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2011, with 20 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 41 years in the span carry no publications at all (1990, 2000 and 2021).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.2 per year counting only the 38 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 23 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1985-1998: 23 publications (1.6 per year); 1999-2012: 67 publications (4.8 per year); 2013-2025: 68 publications (5.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Sankar Sen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sankar Sen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 139 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 139
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Sankar Sen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Sankar Sen, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from City University of New York, records 139 publications - the 36th percentile of the discipline.
  • 36% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Sankar Sen, and about 64% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Sankar Sen ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Sankar Sen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sankar Sen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Sankar Sen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Sankar Sen, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from City University of New York, records 41 D-Index - the 38th percentile of the discipline.
  • 38% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Sankar Sen, and about 62% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Sankar Sen ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Sankar Sen is affiliated with the City University of New York in the United States. Their research contributions span primarily the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, as well as Social Sciences. Within these broader areas, their work focuses notably on subfields including Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Information Systems and Management, and Strategy and Management.

Their scholarly publications frequently appear in several journals, reflecting recurring engagement with specific academic communities. The prominent venues where they have published include:

  • Journal of Business Ethics
  • Journal of Consumer Psychology
  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
  • Journal of the Association for Consumer Research

Sen's research topics concentrate on a range of themes associated with consumer behavior and corporate responsibility. These topics include:

  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Psychology of Social Influence
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Innovation and Socioeconomic Development

Their recent published papers include:

  • "Corporate Purpose and Employee Sustainability Behaviors," 2022, Journal of Business Ethics
  • "Is Salesperson Attractiveness a Boon or a Bane? The Moderating Role of Perceived Labor Cost-To-Price Ratio in Retail Bargaining," 2020, Journal of Consumer Psychology
  • "AI Through a CSR Lens: Consumer Issues and Public Policy," 2023, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
  • "Low-fit cause-related marketing: When and why do consumers respond positively?" 2023, Journal of Consumer Psychology
  • "Moral Motives in Consumption," 2024, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research

Sen often collaborates with a set of frequent coauthors, indicating ongoing research partnerships. These include:

  • Shreyans Goenka
  • CB Bhattacharya
  • Laura Marie Edinger-Schons
  • Apiradee Wongkitrungrueng
  • Diogo Hildebrand

Best Publications

  • Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility

    Sankar Sen;C.B. Bhattacharya

  • Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers¿ Relationships with Companies

    C.B. Bhattacharya;Sankar Sen

  • Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives:

    C.B. Bhattacharya;Sankar Sen

  • Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication

    Shuili Du;C.B. Bhattacharya;Sankar Sen

  • The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: A Field Experiment:

    Sankar Sen;C. B. Bhattacharya;Daniel Korschun

  • Using Corporate Social Responsibility to Win the War for Talent

    C.B. Bhattacharya;Sankar Sen;Daniel Korschun

  • Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning

    Shuili Du;C.B. Bhattacharya;Sankar Sen

  • Strengthening Stakeholder-Company Relationships Through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives

    C. B. Bhattacharya;Daniel Korschun;Sankar Sen

  • Drivers of consumer–brand identification

    Nicola Stokburger-Sauer;S. Ratneshwar;Sankar Sen

  • Why Do Consumers Buy Counterfeit Luxury Brands

    Keith Wilcox;Hyeong Min Kim;Sankar Sen

  • Withholding consumption: A social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts.

    Sankar Sen;Zeynep Gürhan-Canli;Vicki Morwitz

  • Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Overcoming the Trust Barrier

    Shuili Du;C. B. Bhattacharya;Sankar Sen

  • Detecting Failures of Backward Induction: Monitoring Information Search in Sequential Bargaining

    Eric J. Johnson;Colin F. Camerer;Sankar Sen;Talia Rymon

  • The Roles of Leadership Styles in Corporate Social Responsibility.

    Shuili Du;Valérie Swaen;Valérie Swaen;Adam Lindgreen;Sankar Sen

  • Corporate social responsibility: a corporate marketing perspective

    Diogo Hildebrand;Sankar Sen;C.B. Bhattacharya

  • Cognition and framing in sequential bargaining for gains and losses

    Colin F. Camerer;Eric J. Johnson;Talia Rymon;Sankar Sen

  • Indulgence or Self-Control: A Dual Process Model of the Effect of Incidental Pride on Indulgent Choice

    Keith Wilcox;Thomas Kramer;Sankar Sen

  • Leveraging Corporate Responsibility: The Stakeholder Route to Maximizing Business and Social Value

    C. B. Bhattacharya;Sankar Sen;Daniel Korschun

  • Consumer Reactions to CSR: A Brazilian Perspective.

    Sergio W. Carvalho;Sankar Sen;Márcio de Oliveira Mota;Renata Carneiro de Lima

  • Corporate social responsibility, multi-faceted job-products, and employee outcomes

    Shuili Du;C. B. Bhattacharya;Sankar Sen

Frequent Co-Authors

C. B. Bhattacharya
C. B. Bhattacharya University of Pittsburgh
Adam Lindgreen
Adam Lindgreen Copenhagen Business School
Jan Wieseke
Jan Wieseke Ruhr University Bochum
Colin F. Camerer
Colin F. Camerer California Institute of Technology
Valérie Swaen
Valérie Swaen Université Catholique de Louvain
S. Ratneshwar
S. Ratneshwar University of Missouri
Lauren G. Block
Lauren G. Block Baruch College
Sabine Einwiller
Sabine Einwiller University of Vienna
John Roberts
John Roberts Rice University
Priya Raghubir
Priya Raghubir New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a world of flexible learning and diverse career options. Many students are now considering online degrees for their convenience and affordability, especially at the master's level.

If you are interested in social work, finding the cheapest msw programs can help you advance your career without excessive debt. For those driven to make a difference quickly, a fast track social work degree online offers accelerated learning paths so you can enter the workforce sooner.

Psychology remains a popular choice, and the fastest online psychology degree programs allow students to earn qualifications in less time. Meanwhile, those who want to work with individuals with behavioral challenges or autism may be drawn to online bcba programs, which prepare graduates for Board Certified Behavior Analyst certification.

By exploring these flexible, affordable, and high-demand degree options, you can find a pathway that aligns with both your educational goals and your desired career in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Sankar Sen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles