World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard W. Bohannon

Richard W. Bohannon

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
50426
World Ranking
8763
National Ranking
4520

Richard W. Bohannon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. Bohannon sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 515 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard W. Bohannon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. Bohannon sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard W. Bohannon is affiliated with Campbell University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation, Neurology, and Physiology.

The scientist's work explores diverse topics such as Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention, Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation, Nutrition and Health in Aging, Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies, and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders.

Recent publications by Richard W. Bohannon include:

  • Normal gait speed varies by age and sex but not by geographical region: a systematic review, 2022, Journal of physiotherapy
  • Forward flexed posture: reliability and determinants of tragus-to-wall measurement, 2020, Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
  • The heel-raise test for ankle plantarflexor strength: a scoping review and meta-analysis of studies providing norms, 2022, Journal of Physical Therapy Science
  • Performance and Clinimetric Properties of the Timed Up From Floor Test Completed by Apparently Healthy Community-Dwelling Older Women, 2020, Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
  • Isokinetic testing of muscle strength of older individuals post-stroke: An integrative review, 2020, Isokinetics and Exercise Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bohannon include:

  • A. Williams Andrews
  • Frank Tudini
  • Inga Wang
  • Bradley J. Myers
  • Srikant Vallabhajosula

The researcher's publications are often featured in specific academic venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • Isokinetics and Exercise Science
  • Journal of Physical Therapy Science
  • Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
  • Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Journal of physiotherapy

Best Publications

  • Interrater Reliability of a Modified Ashworth Scale of Muscle Spasticity

    Richard W Bohannon;Melissa B Smith

  • Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20—79 years: reference values and determinants

    Richard W. Bohannon

  • Reference values for the timed up and go test: a descriptive meta-analysis.

    Richard W Bohannon

  • Clinical Measurement of Range of Motion Review of Goniometry Emphasizing Reliability and Validity

    Richard L Gajdosik;Richard W Bohannon

  • Hand-grip dynamometry predicts future outcomes in aging adults.

    Richard W Bohannon

  • Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis.

    Richard W. Bohannon;A. Williams Andrews

  • Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years

    Richard W. Bohannon

  • Normative Values for Isometric Muscle Force Measurements Obtained With Hand-held Dynamometers

    Andrews Aw;Thomas Mw;Bohannon Rw

  • Hand Grip Strength: age and gender stratified normative data in a population-based study

    Nicola M Massy-Westropp;Tiffany K Gill;Anne W Taylor;Richard W Bohannon

  • Decrease in Timed Balance Test Scores with Aging

    Richard W Bohannon;Patricia A Larkin;Amy C Cook;James Gear

  • Test-Retest Reliability of Hand-Held Dynamometry During a Single Session of Strength Assessment

    Richard W Bohannon

  • Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis

    Richard W. Bohannon;Anneli Peolsson;Nicola Massy-Westropp;Johanne Desrosiers

  • Grip Strength: An Indispensable Biomarker For Older Adults.

    Richard W Bohannon

  • Sit-to-Stand Test for Measuring Performance of Lower Extremity Muscles:

    Richard W. Bohannon

  • Reference values for the five-repetition sit-to-stand test: a descriptive meta-analysis of data from elders.

    Richard W. Bohannon

  • Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review

    Richard W. Bohannon;Rebecca Crouch

  • Muscle Strength: Clinical and Prognostic Value of Hand-grip Dynamometry

    Richard W. Bohannon

  • Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review:

    Susan Barreca;Steven L. Wolf;Susan Fasoli;Richard Bohannon

  • Relationship between sarcopenia and physical activity in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Michal Steffl;Richard W Bohannon;Lenka Sontakova;James J Tufano

  • Rehabilitation Goals of Patients with Hemiplegia.

    Richard W. Bohannon;A. Williams Andrews;Melissa B. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Gershon
Richard Gershon Northwestern University
William B. White
William B. White University of Connecticut
Charles B. Hall
Charles B. Hall Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Charles R.G. Guttmann
Charles R.G. Guttmann Brigham and Women's Hospital
William Z. Rymer
William Z. Rymer Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Steven V. Owen
Steven V. Owen The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
David B. Reuben
David B. Reuben University of California, Los Angeles
Cyrus Cooper
Cyrus Cooper University of Southampton
Mark D. Litt
Mark D. Litt University of Connecticut Health Center
Howard Tennen
Howard Tennen University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider a career in Medicine in the USA, exploring related online degrees can offer flexible and accelerated pathways to healthcare professions. Whether you’re aiming to become a nurse practitioner, advance your current credentials, or enter a specialized field, online programs provide numerous options.

For those interested in achieving the highest level of nursing practice, the online dnp programs deliver advanced education with the benefit of distance learning. Some students might seek a more convenient path—consider the dnp program without clinical hours which can suit professional needs or scheduling challenges.

If you want to enter nursing quickly, the lpn fast track program can help you start working as a Licensed Practical Nurse faster than traditional routes. Additionally, those passionate about mental health can explore psych np online programs to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner and address the growing demand in mental healthcare.

Each of these online pathways can help streamline your journey toward a rewarding healthcare career, fitting diverse goals and life situations.

Best Scientists Citing Richard W. Bohannon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles