World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Donald A. Jackson

Donald A. Jackson

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
58
Citations
19330
World Ranking
3204
National Ranking
135

Donald A. Jackson publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald A. Jackson sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 146 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Donald A. Jackson D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald A. Jackson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1984 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Donald A. Jackson is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and focuses primarily on Environmental Science. Their research encompasses various subfields including Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, and Pollution.

The scientist's work addresses a range of main topics, notably Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior, Marine and Fisheries Research, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, and Smart Materials for Construction.

Donald A. Jackson has published research in several frequent venues such as the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Global Change Biology, Cancer Research, Ecological Modelling, and Limnology and Oceanography Letters.

Recent papers by Donald A. Jackson include the following:

  • Microplastic contamination in Great Lakes fish, 2021, Conservation Biology
  • Salty summertime streams-road salt contaminated watersheds and estimates of the proportion of impacted species, 2021, FACETS
  • Putting the Mantel test back together again, 2022, Ecology
  • Partitioning fish communities into guilds for ecological analyses: an overview of current approaches and future directions, 2021, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
  • Effects of sample size, data quality, and species response in environmental space on modeling species distributions, 2023, Landscape Ecology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Donald A. Jackson include Cindy Chu, Charlie J. G. Loewen, David M. Benoit, Henrique C. Giacomini, and Lauren Lawson.

Donald A. Jackson was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1984.

Best Publications

  • STOPPING RULES IN PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS: A COMPARISON OF HEURISTICAL AND STATISTICAL APPROACHES'

    Donald A. Jackson

  • What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors

    Donald A Jackson;Pedro R Peres-Neto;Julian D Olden

  • Illuminating the “black box”: a randomization approach for understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks

    Julian D Olden;Donald A Jackson

  • How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test.

    Pedro R. Peres-Neto;Donald A. Jackson

  • How many principal components? stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited

    Pedro R. Peres-Neto;Donald A. Jackson;Keith M. Somers

  • A Comparison of von Bertalanffy and Polynomial Functions in Modelling Fish Growth Data

    Y. Chen;D. A. Jackson;H. H. Harvey

  • PROTEST: A PROcrustean Randomization TEST of community environment concordance

    Donald A. Jackson

  • GIVING MEANINGFUL INTERPRETATION TO ORDINATION AXES: ASSESSING LOADING SIGNIFICANCE IN PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS

    Pedro R. Peres-Neto;Donald A. Jackson;Keith M. Somers

  • Similarity Coefficients: Measures of Co-Occurrence and Association or Simply Measures of Occurrence?

    Donald A. Jackson;Keith M. Somers;Harold H. Harvey

  • Impacts of temperature and selected chemical digestion methods on microplastic particles.

    Keenan Munno;Paul A. Helm;Donald A. Jackson;Chelsea Rochman

  • A comparison of statistical approaches for modelling fish species distributions

    Julian D. Olden;Donald A. Jackson

  • Will northern fish populations be in hot water because of climate change

    Sapna Sharma;Donald A. Jackson;Charles K. Minns;Charles K. Minns;Brian J. Shuter;Brian J. Shuter

  • Biogeographic Associations in Fish Assemblages: Local vs. Regional Processes

    Donald A. Jackson;Harold H. Harvey

  • Variable selection in large environmental data sets using principal components analysis

    Jacquelynne R. King;Donald A. Jackson

  • Qualitative and quantitative sampling of lake fish communities

    Donald A Jackson;Harold H Harvey

  • Spatial isolation and fish communities in drainage lakes.

    Julian D. Olden;Donald A. Jackson;Pedro R. Peres-Neto

  • The influence of smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) predation and habitat complexity on the structure of littoral zone fish assemblages

    Pamela S. D. Macrae;Donald A. Jackson

  • Predictive Models of Fish Species Distributions: A Note on Proper Validation and Chance Predictions

    Julian D. Olden;Donald A. Jackson;Pedro R. Peres-Neto

  • Fish–Habitat Relationships in Lakes: Gaining Predictive and Explanatory Insight by Using Artificial Neural Networks

    Julian D. Olden;Donald A. Jackson

  • COMPOSITIONAL DATA IN COMMUNITY ECOLOGY: THE PARADIGM OR PERIL OF PROPORTIONS?

    Donald A. Jackson

  • Fish and Benthic Invertebrates: Community Concordance and Community–Environment Relationships

    Donald A. Jackson;Harold H. Harvey

  • What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities — the roles of biotic, abiotic, and

    Donald A. Jackson;Pedro R. Peres-Neto;Julian D. Olden

  • COMPARISON OF STATISTICAL APPROACHES FOR MODELING FISH SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS

    J D Olden;D A Jackson

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith M. Somers
Keith M. Somers University of Toronto
Satyendra P. Bhavsar
Satyendra P. Bhavsar University of Toronto
Julian D. Olden
Julian D. Olden University of Washington
Brian J. Shuter
Brian J. Shuter University of Toronto
Pedro R. Peres-Neto
Pedro R. Peres-Neto Concordia University
Mark S. Ridgway
Mark S. Ridgway Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
Marie-Josée Fortin
Marie-Josée Fortin University of Toronto
Timo Muotka
Timo Muotka University of Oulu
Nicholas E. Mandrak
Nicholas E. Mandrak University of Toronto
Jani Heino
Jani Heino University of Oulu

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Environmental Sciences often involves diverse academic routes and flexible learning options. Many professionals seek advanced education without the traditional demands, making a doctorate degree online no dissertation an attractive choice for those balancing work and study. Such programs emphasize practical skills alongside research, preparing graduates for leadership roles in environmental management and policy.

For educators and administrators focusing on environmental education, finding accredited eds to edd programs is crucial. These pathways offer advanced training in educational leadership, helping professionals integrate sustainability principles into curricula effectively.

Social work also intersects with Environmental Sciences, particularly in community health and advocacy. Affordable options like a dsw program provide the necessary credentials to drive positive environmental and social change within vulnerable populations.

Additionally, students seeking broad foundational knowledge can benefit from an affordable online general studies degree. This versatile degree supports exploration across disciplines, offering flexibility for those interested in combining environmental studies with other fields.

Best Scientists Citing Donald A. Jackson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles