World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 101 384 348 21 21 366 40872

Philippe Langella publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philippe Langella between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philippe Langella published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2018. 22 of the 404 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2018. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 10 publications
1982 2025

404 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philippe Langella: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 2
1994 2
1995 0
1996 2
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 2
2001 6
2002 3
2003 6
2004 5
2005 10
2006 12
2007 9
2008 10
2009 15
2010 10
2011 11
2012 22
2013 27
2014 21
2015 26
2016 26
2017 24
2018 29
2019 20
2020 18
2021 13
2022 19
2023 26
2024 12
2025 10
Total 404
Download as CSV

Philippe Langella publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Langella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 365–374 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 366 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65 366
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Philippe Langella D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Langella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16 101
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Philippe Langella is a researcher affiliated with the University of Paris-Saclay in France. Their work focuses primarily on the interactions between gut microbiota and human health, with significant contributions in biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine.

The researcher's publications span several key topics, including:

  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Gastrointestinal motility and disorders

The main fields of study covered in their work are Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with specific emphasis on molecular biology, food science, nutrition and dietetics, infectious diseases, and physiology.

Frequent publication venues for Langella include Microorganisms, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Gut Microbes, Scientific Reports, and Nutrients, reflecting a broad spectrum of microbiome-related research outputs.

Collaboration features prominently in Langella's career, with notable co-authors being Luis G. Bermúdez-Humarán, Rebeca Martín, Jean-Marc Chatel, Florian Chain, and Harry Sokol. Each has contributed to multiple joint publications advancing understanding in gut microbiota and related fields.

Selected recent publications highlight a focus on microbiota-derived molecules and their effects on human health:

  • Faecalibacterium: a bacterial genus with promising human health applications, 2023, FEMS Microbiology Reviews
  • Butyrate mediates anti-inflammatory effects of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in intestinal epithelial cells through Dact3, 2020, Gut Microbes
  • Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand production by the gut microbiota is decreased in celiac disease leading to intestinal inflammation, 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • The microbial metabolite p-Cresol induces autistic-like behaviors in mice by remodeling the gut microbiota, 2021, Microbiome
  • Possible Benefits of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii for Obesity-Associated Gut Disorders, 2021, Frontiers in Pharmacology

Best Publications

  • Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients

    Harry Sokol;Bénédicte Pigneur;Laurie Watterlot;Omar Lakhdari

  • CARD9 impacts colitis by altering gut microbiota metabolism of tryptophan into aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands

    Bruno Lamas;Mathias L Richard;Valentin Leducq;Hang-Phuong Pham

  • Fungal microbiota dysbiosis in IBD

    Harry Sokol;Valentin Leducq;Hugues Aschard;Hang-Phuong Pham

  • Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and human intestinal health

    S. Miquel;R. Martin;R. Martin;O. Rossi;L.G. Bermudez-Humaran;L.G. Bermudez-Humaran

  • Microbial dysbiosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

    Iradj Sobhani;Julien Tap;Françoise Roudot-Thoraval;Jean P. Roperch

  • Connecting dysbiosis, bile-acid dysmetabolism and gut inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases

    Henri Duboc;Sylvie Rajca;Sylvie Rajca;Dominique Rainteau;Dominique Rainteau;David Benarous

  • Intestinal mucosal adherence and translocation of commensal bacteria at the early onset of type 2 diabetes: molecular mechanisms and probiotic treatment

    Jacques Amar;Chantal Chabo;Aurelie Waget;Pascale Klopp

  • Beneficial effects on host energy metabolism of short-chain fatty acids and vitamins produced by commensal and probiotic bacteria

    Jean Guy LeBlanc;Florian Chain;Rebeca Martín;Luis G. Bermúdez-Humarán

  • Identification of an anti-inflammatory protein from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a commensal bacterium deficient in Crohn’s disease

    E. Quévrain;M.A. Maubert;C. Michon;F. Chain;F. Chain

  • Enterococcus hirae and Barnesiella intestinihominis Facilitate Cyclophosphamide-Induced Therapeutic Immunomodulatory Effects

    Romain Daillère;Romain Daillère;Romain Daillère;Marie Vétizou;Marie Vétizou;Marie Vétizou;Nadine Waldschmitt;Takahiro Yamazaki;Takahiro Yamazaki

  • Towards standards for human fecal sample processing in metagenomic studies

    Paul I. Costea;Georg Zeller;Shinichi Sunagawa;Eric Pelletier;Eric Pelletier

  • Two plasmid-determined restriction and modification systems in Streptococcus lactis.

    Alain Chopin;Marie-Christine Chopin;Agnès Moillo-Batt;Philippe Langella

  • Impaired Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Ligand Production by the Gut Microbiota Is a Key Factor in Metabolic Syndrome.

    Jane M. Natividad;Allison Agus;Julien Planchais;Bruno Lamas;Bruno Lamas

  • Faecalibacterium: a bacterial genus with promising human health applications

    Unknown

  • Functional Characterization of Novel Faecalibacterium prausnitzii Strains Isolated from Healthy Volunteers: A Step Forward in the Use of F. prausnitzii as a Next-Generation Probiotic.

    Rebeca Martín;Sylvie Miquel;Sylvie Miquel;Leandro Benevides;Leandro Benevides;Chantal Bridonneau

  • Faecal microbiota study reveals specific dysbiosis in spondyloarthritis

    Maxime Breban;Julien Tap;Ariane Leboime;Roula Said-Nahal

  • Emerging Health Concepts in the Probiotics Field: Streamlining the Definitions.

    Rebeca Martín;Philippe Langella

  • Fungal dysbiosis in mucosa-associated microbiota of Crohn’s disease patients

    Giuseppina Liguori;Bruno Lamas;Mathias L. Richard;Mathias L. Richard;Giovanni Brandi

  • Impairment of the Intestinal Barrier by Ethanol Involves Enteric Microflora and Mast Cell Activation in Rodents

    Laurent Ferrier;Florian Bérard;Laurent Debrauwer;Chantal Chabo

  • Faecalibacterium prausnitzii prevents physiological damages in a chronic low-grade inflammation murine model

    Rebeca Martín;Rebeca Martín;Rebeca Martín;Sylvie Miquel;Sylvie Miquel;Florian Chain;Florian Chain;Jane M Natividad

  • Role of commensal and probiotic bacteria in human health: a focus on inflammatory bowel disease

    Rebeca Martín;Rebeca Martín;Sylvie Miquel;Sylvie Miquel;Jonathan Ulmer;Jonathan Ulmer;Noura Kechaou;Noura Kechaou

  • Lactococci and lactobacilli as mucosal delivery vectors for therapeutic proteins and DNA vaccines.

    Luis G Bermúdez-Humarán;Pascale Kharrat;Jean-Marc Chatel;Philippe Langella

  • Lactococcus lactis, an Efficient Cell Factory for Recombinant Protein Production and Secretion

    E. Morello;L.G. Bermúdez-Humarán;D. Llull;V. Solé

Frequent Co-Authors

Luis G. Bermúdez-Humarán
Luis G. Bermúdez-Humarán University of Paris-Saclay
Harry Sokol
Harry Sokol Sorbonne University
Vasco Azevedo
Vasco Azevedo Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Anderson Miyoshi
Anderson Miyoshi Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Gérard Corthier
Gérard Corthier INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Jean Guy LeBlanc
Jean Guy LeBlanc National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Yves Le Loir
Yves Le Loir INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Alexandra Gruss
Alexandra Gruss INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
François Lefèvre
François Lefèvre INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Microbiology often opens doors to various healthcare and science-related fields. Many students also explore complementary online programs to broaden their career prospects. For example, obtaining an online cahiim accredited health information management degree can be a strategic step for those interested in the management and analysis of health data, a growing field with promising opportunities.

Career paths such as health information management often offer competitive salaries, making it a worthwhile consideration. To understand earning potential, you can research health information management jobs salary trends, which reflect strong demand for skilled professionals in this sector.

For students seeking quicker certification options, exploring the quickest medical billing and coding certificate online may offer a fast track to enter the healthcare field. Additionally, a variety of online healthcare degrees that pay well are available, providing flexibility and access to high-demand careers without the need to relocate.

Integrating microbiology studies with these online educational paths can significantly enhance career opportunities in healthcare, research, and administration.

Best Scientists Citing Philippe Langella

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles