World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
28156
World Ranking
13171
National Ranking
6714

Philip B. McGlave publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip B. McGlave sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 224 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip B. McGlave D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip B. McGlave sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Philip B. McGlave is a researcher affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States.

Throughout their career, McGlave has been recognized as a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical NK cells in patients with cancer.

    Jeffrey S. Miller;Yvette Soignier;Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari;Sarah A. McNearney

  • Infusion of ex vivo expanded T regulatory cells in adults transplanted with umbilical cord blood: safety profile and detection kinetics.

    Claudio G. Brunstein;Jeffrey S. Miller;Qing Cao;David H. McKenna

  • Analysis of 462 transplantations from unrelated donors facilitated by the national marrow donor program

    Nancy A. Kernan;Glenn Bartsch;Robert C. Ash;Patrick G. Beatty

  • Transplantation of 2 partially HLA-matched umbilical cord blood units to enhance engraftment in adults with hematologic malignancy

    Juliet N. Barker;Daniel J. Weisdorf;Todd E. DeFor;Bruce R. Blazar

  • Bone marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase. Increased risk for relapse associated with T-cell depletion.

    John M. Goldman;Robert Peter Gale;Mary M. Horowitz;James C. Biggs

  • Successful transplantation of HLA-matched and HLA-mismatched umbilical cord blood from unrelated donors: analysis of engraftment and acute graft-versus-host disease

    John E. Wagner;Joseph Rosenthal;Joseph Rosenthal;Robert Sweetman;Robert Sweetman;Xiao Ou Shu;Xiao Ou Shu

  • Umbilical cord blood transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning: impact on transplantation outcomes in 110 adults with hematologic disease

    Claudio G. Brunstein;Juliet N. Barker;Daniel J. Weisdorf;Todd E. DeFor

  • Late mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and functional status of long-term survivors: Report from the Bone Marrow Transplant Survivor study

    Smita Bhatia;Liton Francisco;Andrea Carter;Can Lan Sun

  • Treatment of moderate/severe acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: an analysis of clinical risk features and outcome.

    Daniel Weisdorf;Robert Haake;Bruce Blazar;Wesley Miller

  • Clearance of Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Haploidentical Natural Killer Cells Is Improved Using IL-2 Diphtheria Toxin Fusion Protein

    Veronika Bachanova;Sarah Cooley;Todd E. Defor;Michael R. Verneris

  • Comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for treatment of high-risk refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    John H. Kersey;Daniel Weisdorf;Mark E. Nesbit;Tucker W. LeBien

  • Umbilical cord blood–derived T regulatory cells to prevent GVHD: kinetics, toxicity profile, and clinical effect

    Claudio G. Brunstein;Jeffrey S. Miller;David H. McKenna;Keli L. Hippen

  • Varying intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia.

    Peter A. Cassileth;Elizabeth Lynch;John D. Hines;Martin M. Oken

  • Cytomegalovirus infection after bone marrow transplantation: an association with acute graft-v-host disease.

    Wesley Miller;Patrick Flynn;Jeffrey McCullough;Henry H. Balfour

  • Risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease in histocompatible donor bone marrow transplantation

    Daniel Weisdorf;Robert Hakke;Bruce Blazar;Wesley Miller

  • Mechanisms underlying abnormal trafficking of malignant progenitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Decreased adhesion to stroma and fibronectin but increased adhesion to the basement membrane components laminin and collagen type IV.

    Catherine Verfaillie;J B McCarthy;P B McGlave

  • Unrelated donor marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia: 9 years' experience of the national marrow donor program.

    Philip B. McGlave;Xiao Ou Shu;Wanqing Wen;Claudio Anasetti

  • Purified primitive human hematopoietic progenitor cells with long-term in vitro repopulating capacity adhere selectively to irradiated bone marrow stroma.

    Catherine Verfaillie;K Blakolmer;P McGlave

  • Relapse risk after umbilical cord blood transplantation: enhanced graft-versus-leukemia effect in recipients of 2 units.

    Michael R. Verneris;Claudio G. Brunstein;Juliet Barker;Margaret L. MacMillan

  • A Randomized Study of the Prevention of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease

    Norma K. C. Ramsay;John H. Kersey;Leslie L. Robison;Philip B. McGlave

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel J. Weisdorf
Daniel J. Weisdorf University of Minnesota
Jeffrey S. Miller
Jeffrey S. Miller University of Minnesota
Bruce R. Blazar
Bruce R. Blazar University of Minnesota
Norma K.C. Ramsay
Norma K.C. Ramsay University of Minnesota
John H. Kersey
John H. Kersey University of Minnesota
John E. Wagner
John E. Wagner University of Minnesota
Todd E. DeFor
Todd E. DeFor University of Minnesota
Michael R. Verneris
Michael R. Verneris University of Colorado Denver
William G. Woods
William G. Woods Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn’t always require attending traditional, in-person classes. Online degrees have become increasingly popular for students seeking flexibility and convenience. Many future healthcare professionals are starting their journey with rn to bsn online no clinicals pathways, which allow registered nurses to earn their bachelor’s degree without on-site clinical requirements.

For those interested in leadership or administrative roles, the top cahme accredited mha programs offer a way to develop high-level management skills in healthcare settings. These qualifications are highly regarded and can open doors to executive positions.

Nurses looking to advance their education quickly can consider accelerated dnp programs, allowing them to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree faster than traditional timelines. There are also flexible dnp programs online designed for various learning needs, providing more accessible opportunities to achieve the highest level of nursing practice. Exploring these online options can help form a strong foundation for rewarding medical careers in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Philip B. McGlave

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles