World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
28
Citations
8051
World Ranking
1317
National Ranking
655

Fay Lomax Cook publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fay Lomax Cook sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 115 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Fay Lomax Cook D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fay Lomax Cook sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 28 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fay Lomax Cook is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. The academic record available does not list specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or detailed fields and subfields of study related to their work. Likewise, no main topics or awards have been documented in the data provided.

Without specifics on publications or research topics, it is clear that Fay Lomax Cook has maintained a professional connection with a major research institution, Northwestern University. This association situates the researcher within an environment known for diverse scholarly activities.

While particular contributions or areas of expertise are not enumerated, affiliation with such a university suggests engagement with academic research and scholarship within the U.S. higher education system.

Best Publications

  • Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature

    Michael X. Delli Carpini;Fay Lomax Cook;Lawrence R. Jacobs

  • The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion

    Toby Bolsen;James N. Druckman;Fay Lomax Cook

  • Media and Agenda Setting: Effects on the Public, Interest Group Leaders, Policy Makers, and Policy

    Fay Lomax Cook;Tom R. Tyler;Edward G. Goetz;Margaret T. Gordon

  • The mass media and judgments of risk: Distinguishing impact on personal and societal level judgments.

    Tom R. Tyler;Fay L. Cook

  • Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America

    Lawrence R. Jacobs;Fay Lomax Cook;Michael X. Delli Carpini

  • A Democratic Polity?: Three Views of Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion in the United States

    Jeff Manza;Fay Lomax Cook

  • The Journalism of Outrage: Investigative Reporting and Agenda Building in America

    David Protess;Fay Cook;Jack C. Doppelt;James Ettema

  • Support for the American Welfare State: The Views of Congress and the Public

    Fay Lomax Cook;Edith J. Barrett

  • Trusting What You Know: Information, Knowledge, and Confidence in Social Security

    Fay Lomax Cook;Lawrence R. Jacobs;Dukhong Kim

  • The Polls—Trends Public Opinion on Energy Policy: 1974–2006

    Toby Bolsen;Fay Lomax Cook

  • How Frames Can Undermine Support for Scientific Adaptations: Politicization and the Status-Quo Bias

    Toby Bolsen;James N. Druckman;Fay Lomax Cook

  • Citizens’, Scientists’, and Policy Advisors’ Beliefs about Global Warming

    Toby Bolsen;James N. Druckman;Fay Lomax Cook

  • The Impact of Investigative Reporting on Public Opinion and Policymaking: Targeting Toxic Waste

    David L. Protess;Fay Lomax Cook;Thomas R. Curtin;Margaret T. Gordon

  • Navigating Public Opinion : Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy

    Jeffrey Manza;Fay Lomax Cook;Benjamin Page

  • Invoking Public Opinion: Policy Elites and Social Security

    Fay Lomax Cook;Jason Barabas;Benjamin I. Page

  • Who Should Be Helped: Public Support for Social Services

    Fay Lomax Cook

  • Patterns of Personal Crime Against the Elderly: Findings from a National Survey

    George E. Antunes;Fay Lomax Cook;Thomas D. Cook;Wesley G. Skogan

  • Criminal Victimization of the Elderly: The Physical and Economic Consequences

    Fay Lomax Cook;Wesley G. Skogan;Thomas D. Cook;George E. Antunes

  • Solidarity and tension between age‐groups in the United States: challenge for an aging America in the 21st century

    M. Silverstein;T. Parrott;J.J. Angelinni;F.L. Cook

  • Promised Incentives in Media Research: A Look at Data Quality, Sample Representativeness, and Response Rate

    Edward G. Goetz;Tom R. Tyler;Fay Lomax Cook

  • Who Deliberates? Discursive Participation in America

    Fay Lomax Cook;Michael X. Delli Carpini;Lawrence R. Jacobs

  • The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: The State of the Debate

    Jeffrey Manza;Fay Lomax Cook

  • Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics by James A. Stimson

    Fay Lomax Cook

  • Evaluating the Rhetoric of Crisis: A Case Study of Criminal Victimization of the Elderly

    Fay Lomax Cook;Thomas D. Cook

  • Conflict over Intergenerational Equity: Rhetoric and Reality in a Comparative Context

    Fay Lomax Cook

  • Citizens', Scientists', and Policy Advisors' Beliefs about Global Warming (WP-14-17)

    Toby Bolsen;James Druckman;Fay Lomax Cook

Frequent Co-Authors

Toby Bolsen
Toby Bolsen Georgia State University
Lawrence R. Jacobs
Lawrence R. Jacobs University of Minnesota
James N. Druckman
James N. Druckman University of Rochester
Michael X. Delli Carpini
Michael X. Delli Carpini University of Pennsylvania
Benjamin I. Page
Benjamin I. Page Northwestern University
Wesley G. Skogan
Wesley G. Skogan Northwestern University
Jason Barabas
Jason Barabas Dartmouth College
Jeff Manza
Jeff Manza New York University
Thomas D. Cook
Thomas D. Cook University of Wisconsin–Madison
Tom R. Tyler
Tom R. Tyler Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens the door to a variety of related fields and career options. Many students pursue history degrees to deepen their understanding of international affairs, public policy, and historical movements, which can complement a political science background.

For those seeking versatility, interdisciplinary studies graduate programs allow you to combine political science with fields such as economics, sociology, or communications. These programs can help build unique skill sets and open up diverse career pathways in fields like education, media, or nonprofit leadership.

Professionals interested in advanced historical research or teaching may consider online MA history programs. These flexible degree options provide valuable expertise for roles in academia, research, or public administration.

Finally, for those looking to quickly enhance their credentials, there are 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These short-term certifications can be a smart way to gain marketable skills and improve job prospects within or adjacent to political science fields.

Best Scientists Citing Fay Lomax Cook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles