World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Stamp

Peter Stamp

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 57 1470 1349 35 33 237 10055

Peter Stamp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Stamp between 1980 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Stamp published across 41 years, from 1980 to 2020, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2010. 5 of the 239 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2010. 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 4 publications
1980 2020

239 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Stamp: publications per year, 1980 to 2020
Year Publications
1980 3
1981 1
1982 0
1983 3
1984 1
1985 1
1986 3
1987 5
1988 1
1989 2
1990 2
1991 2
1992 10
1993 6
1994 2
1995 3
1996 6
1997 7
1998 7
1999 11
2000 10
2001 5
2002 5
2003 11
2004 11
2005 10
2006 5
2007 9
2008 11
2009 17
2010 18
2011 10
2012 14
2013 9
2014 5
2015 2
2016 3
2017 2
2018 1
2019 1
2020 4
Total 239
Download as CSV

Peter Stamp publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Stamp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 236–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 237 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64 237
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Peter Stamp D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Stamp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88 57
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Agronomy

Peter Stamp mainly focuses on Agronomy, Poaceae, Botany, Photosynthesis and Horticulture. His studies deal with areas such as Quantitative trait locus and Inbred strain as well as Agronomy. His Poaceae research includes themes of Field experiment, Pollen, Resistance, Dry weight and Anthesis.

His Botany study incorporates themes from Abscisic acid, Salicylic acid, Jasmonic acid and Complementary DNA, CDNA Subtraction. Within one scientific family, he focuses on topics pertaining to Photosynthetic capacity under Horticulture, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Mehler reaction. Peter Stamp has included themes like Dry matter, Biosynthesis and Sowing in his Shoot study.

His most cited work include:

  • Chlorophyll fluorescence as a selection tool for cold tolerance of photosynthesis in maize (Zea mays L.) (214 citations)
  • Drought stress and tropical maize: QTL-by-environment interactions and stability of QTLs across environments for yield components and secondary traits (200 citations)
  • Effect of heat stress on the photosynthetic apparatus in maize (Zea mays L.) grown at control or high temperature (138 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Agronomy, Poaceae, Botany, Horticulture and Shoot are his primary areas of study. His study involves Root system, Hybrid, Cultivar, Seedling and Zea mays, a branch of Agronomy. His Seedling study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Quantitative trait locus and Dry weight.

His research investigates the connection with Poaceae and areas like Sowing which intersect with concerns in Cropping system and Lolium multiflorum. His work in Botany addresses subjects such as Doubled haploidy, which are connected to disciplines such as Chromosomal translocation. His research on Horticulture frequently links to adjacent areas such as Photosynthesis.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (70.83%)
  • Poaceae (32.29%)
  • Botany (22.92%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2008-2020)?

  • Agronomy (70.83%)
  • Poaceae (32.29%)
  • Root system (11.46%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Agronomy, Poaceae, Root system, Hybrid and Quantitative trait locus. As part of one scientific family, he deals mainly with the area of Agronomy, narrowing it down to issues related to the Inbred strain, and often Heterosis. The study incorporates disciplines such as Pollen and Horticulture in addition to Poaceae.

Peter Stamp studied Root system and Lateral root that intersect with Germination and Desiccation. Peter Stamp has researched Hybrid in several fields, including Germplasm and Sowing. His work focuses on many connections between Quantitative trait locus and other disciplines, such as Seedling, that overlap with his field of interest in Dry weight.

Between 2008 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Drought stress and tropical maize: QTL-by-environment interactions and stability of QTLs across environments for yield components and secondary traits (200 citations)
  • Growth of axile and lateral roots of maize: I development of a phenotying platform (116 citations)
  • Mapping of QTLs for lateral and axile root growth of tropical maize (81 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Agriculture

Peter Stamp mainly investigates Agronomy, Quantitative trait locus, Inbred strain, Root system and Botany. As part of his studies on Agronomy, Peter Stamp often connects relevant areas like Genetically modified crops. His Quantitative trait locus study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Chlorophyll, Seedling and Plant breeding.

His Inbred strain research focuses on subjects like Desiccation, which are linked to Plant morphology and Abiotic component. He interconnects Cell biology, Horticulture and Green fluorescent protein in the investigation of issues within Botany. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Phloem loading, Chloroplast and Poaceae.

Best Publications

  • Drought stress and tropical maize: QTL-by-environment interactions and stability of QTLs across environments for yield components and secondary traits

    Rainer Messmer;Yvan Fracheboud;Marianne Bänziger;Mateo Vargas

  • Chlorophyll fluorescence as a selection tool for cold tolerance of photosynthesis in maize (Zea mays L.)

    Y. Fracheboud;P. Haldimann;J. Leipner;P. Stamp

  • Effect of heat stress on the photosynthetic apparatus in maize (Zea mays L.) grown at control or high temperature

    Veerana Sinsawat;Jörg Leipner;Peter Stamp;Yvan Fracheboud

  • Effects of pre-anthesis drought, nitrogen fertilizer rate, and variety on grain yield, yield components, and harvest index of tropical maize

    Samuel B. Moser;Boy Feil;Sansern Jampatong;Peter Stamp

  • Quantitative trait loci for lodging resistance in a segregating wheat×spelt population

    M. Keller;Ch. Karutz;J. E. Schmid;P. Stamp

  • Quantitative trait loci for resistance against powdery mildew in a segregating wheat×spelt population

    M. Keller;B. Keller;G. Schachermayr;M. Winzeler

  • Genetic analysis of cold-tolerance of photosynthesis in maize

    Y Fracheboud;C Jompuk;J. M. Ribaut;P. Stamp

  • Morphological traits associated with lodging resistance of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

    U. Zuber;H. Winzeler;M. M. Messmer;M. Keller

  • Effect of growing season on the photosynthetic apparatus and leaf antioxidative defenses in two maize genotypes of different chilling tolerance

    Jörg Leipner;Yvan Fracheboud;Peter Stamp

  • QTL controlling root and shoot traits of maize seedlings under cold stress

    A. Hund;A. Hund;Y. Fracheboud;A. Soldati;Elisabetta Frascaroli

  • Growth of axile and lateral roots of maize: I development of a phenotying platform

    A. Hund;S. Trachsel;P. Stamp

  • Legume cover crops as living mulches for winter wheat: Components of biomass and the control of weeds

    Jürg Hiltbrunner;Markus Liedgens;Lucia Bloch;Peter Stamp

  • Impact of tillage on maize rooting in a Cambisol and Luvisol in Switzerland

    Ruijun Qin;Peter Stamp;Walter Richner

  • Acclimation by suboptimal growth temperature diminishes photooxidative damage in maize leaves

    J. Leipner;Y. Fracheboud;P. Stamp

  • Impact of Tillage on Root Systems of Winter Wheat

    Ruijun Qin;Peter Stamp;Walter Richner

  • Root distribution and morphology of maize seedlings as affected by tillage and fertilizer placement

    André Chassot;Peter Stamp;Walter Richner

  • Identification of quantitative trait loci for cold‐tolerance of photosynthesis in maize (Zea mays L.)

    Fracheboud Y;Ribaut Jm;Vargas M;Messmer R

  • Glutathione synthesis in maize genotypes with different sensitivities to chilling

    Gábor Kocsy;Monika Brunner;Adrian Rüegsegger;Peter Stamp

  • Mineral Composition of the Grains of Tropical Maize Varieties as Affected by Pre-Anthesis Drought and Rate of Nitrogen Fertilization

    B. Feil;S. B. Moser;S. Jampatong;P. Stamp

  • Growth and development of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings under chilling conditions in the field

    M.J. Verheul;C. Picatto;P. Stamp

  • Mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with chilling tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings grown under field conditions

    Choosak Jompuk;Yvan Fracheboud;Peter Stamp;Jörg Leipner

  • AMMONIUM TOLERANCE AND CARBOHYDRATE STATUS IN MAIZE CULTIVARS

    Marcus Schortemeyer;Peter Stamp;Boy Feil

  • Photosynthetic activity of developing leaves of Zea mays is less affected by heat stress than that of developed leaves

    Md. Abdul Karim;Yvan Fracheboud;Peter Stamp

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Hund
Andreas Hund ETH Zurich
Beat Keller
Beat Keller University of Zurich
Marianne Bänziger
Marianne Bänziger International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Jean-Marcel Ribaut
Jean-Marcel Ribaut International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Mateo Vargas
Mateo Vargas Chapingo Autonomous University
Achim Walter
Achim Walter ETH Zurich
Albrecht E. Melchinger
Albrecht E. Melchinger University of Hohenheim
Richard G. F. Visser
Richard G. F. Visser Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter Stamp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles