World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Achim Walter

Achim Walter

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 58 1345 1233 32 30 178 12181

Achim Walter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Achim Walter between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Achim Walter published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2023. 23 of the 284 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2023. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 2 publications
1997 2026

284 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Achim Walter: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 3
2000 3
2001 4
2002 7
2003 5
2004 3
2005 8
2006 8
2007 8
2008 8
2009 10
2010 6
2011 7
2012 18
2013 8
2014 11
2015 16
2016 9
2017 20
2018 17
2019 11
2020 8
2021 10
2022 12
2023 23
2024 17
2025 21
2026 2
Total 284
Download as CSV

Achim Walter publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Achim Walter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 176–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 178 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126 178
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Achim Walter D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Achim Walter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91 58
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Gene

His primary areas of study are Botany, Photosynthesis, Ecology, Growth rate and Arabidopsis thaliana. The various areas that Achim Walter examines in his Botany study include Wild type, Diel vertical migration, Arabidopsis and Nicotiana tabacum. His Photosynthesis study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Cytoplasm, Transcriptome, Gene expression and Cell growth.

His Ecology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Plant growth, Specific leaf area and Root growth. His Growth rate research focuses on subjects like Biological system, which are linked to Plant phenotyping, Plant traits, Data mining and Rhizotron. His Agronomy course of study focuses on Plant species and Nutrient.

His most cited work include:

  • Simultaneous phenotyping of leaf growth and chlorophyll fluorescence via GROWSCREEN FLUORO allows detection of stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and other rosette plants. (205 citations)
  • Plant phenotyping: from bean weighing to image analysis (195 citations)
  • Environmental Effects on Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Leaf and Root Growth (183 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Achim Walter mainly investigates Botany, Agronomy, Canopy, Diel vertical migration and Horticulture. His work in Botany covers topics such as Arabidopsis thaliana which are related to areas like Arabidopsis. His Agronomy research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Soil water and Nutrient.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Genetic variation and Remote sensing. Achim Walter has researched Diel vertical migration in several fields, including Nocturnal and Carbohydrate metabolism. Achim Walter focuses mostly in the field of Horticulture, narrowing it down to matters related to Relative growth rate and, in some cases, Seedling.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (38.22%)
  • Agronomy (28.27%)
  • Canopy (14.14%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Horticulture (14.14%)
  • Precision agriculture (7.33%)
  • Agronomy (28.27%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Achim Walter mainly focuses on Horticulture, Precision agriculture, Agronomy, Crop and Genetics. His study in the field of Dioscorea alata also crosses realms of Nadir, Nutritional status and Image based. His research integrates issues of Robotics and Aerial survey in his study of Precision agriculture.

He carries out multidisciplinary research, doing studies in Agronomy and Variable. Achim Walter has included themes like Ecosystem services, Spatial variability, Cover crop, Variable Rate Application and Species diversity in his Crop study. His Candidate gene research incorporates themes from Adaptation and Arabidopsis thaliana.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Precision Farming at the Nexus of Agricultural Production and the Environment (56 citations)
  • Spectral Vegetation Indices to Track Senescence Dynamics in Diverse Wheat Germplasm. (13 citations)
  • Assessment of Multi-Image Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based High-Throughput Field Phenotyping of Canopy Temperature. (10 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Gene

Achim Walter focuses on Precision agriculture, Remote sensing, Hyperspectral imaging, Crop and Weed. His study in Precision agriculture is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Robot, Artificial intelligence and Sustainability. His Remote sensing study combines topics in areas such as Pixel and Heritability.

He has included themes like Cross-validation, Multispectral image, Data mining, Classifier and Data-driven in his Hyperspectral imaging study. His Crop research includes themes of Sowing, Biomass, Ecosystem services, Cover crop and Species diversity. His Weed study incorporates themes from Agriculture, Food security, Canopy and Raw data.

Best Publications

  • The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance

    Achim Walter;Michael Auer;Thomas Ritter

  • Value Creation in Buyer–Seller Relationships: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results from a Supplier's Perspective

    Achim Walter;Thomas Ritter;Hans Georg Gemünden

  • Opinion: smart farming is key to developing sustainable agriculture.

    Achim Walter;Robert Finger;Robert Huber;Nina Buchmann

  • Functions of industrial supplier relationships and their impact on relationship quality

    Achim Walter;Thilo A Müller;Gabriele Helfert;Thomas Ritter

  • Precision Farming at the Nexus of Agricultural Production and the Environment

    Robert Finger;Scott M. Swinton;Nadja El Benni;Achim Walter

  • Plant phenotyping: from bean weighing to image analysis

    Achim Walter;Frank Liebisch;Andreas Hund

  • Simultaneous phenotyping of leaf growth and chlorophyll fluorescence via GROWSCREEN FLUORO allows detection of stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and other rosette plants.

    Marcus Jansen;Frank Gilmer;Bernhard Biskup;Kerstin A Nagel

  • Redefining market orientation from a relationship perspective: Theoretical considerations and empirical results

    Gabriele Helfert;Thomas Ritter;Achim Walter

  • Nutrient acquisition from arable subsoils in temperate climates: A review

    Timo Kautz;Wulf Amelung;Frank Ewert;Thomas Gaiser

  • The influence of adaptations, trust, and commitment on value‐creating functions of customer relationships

    Achim Walter;Thomas Ritter

  • Hyperspectral Sensors and Imaging Technologies in Phytopathology: State of the Art.

    Anne-Katrin Mahlein;Matheus T. Kuska;Jan Behmann;Gerrit Polder

  • Temperature responses of roots: impact on growth, root system architecture and implications for phenotyping.

    Kerstin A. Nagel;Bernd Kastenholz;Siegfried Jahnke;Dagmar van Dusschoten

  • Environmental Effects on Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Leaf and Root Growth

    Achim Walter;Wendy K. Silk;Ulrich Schurr

  • WeedMap: A Large-Scale Semantic Weed Mapping Framework Using Aerial Multispectral Imaging and Deep Neural Network for Precision Farming

    Inkyu Sa;Marija Popovic;Raghav Khanna;Zetao Chen

  • Pathways for advancing pesticide policies

    Niklas Möhring;Karin Ingold;Karin Ingold;Per Kudsk;Fabrice Martin-Laurent

  • Dynamics of seedling growth acclimation towards altered light conditions can be quantified via GROWSCREEN: a setup and procedure designed for rapid optical phenotyping of different plant species.

    Achim Walter;Hanno Scharr;Frank Gilmer;Rainer Zierer

  • Dynamics of Leaf and Root Growth: Endogenous Control versus Environmental Impact

    Achim Walter;Ulrich Schurr

  • Feedbacks between soil penetration resistance, root architecture and water uptake limit water accessibility and crop growth – A vicious circle

    Tino Colombi;Tino Colombi;Lorena Chagas Torres;Achim Walter;Thomas Keller

  • Functional dynamics of plant growth and photosynthesis--from steady-state to dynamics--from homogeneity to heterogeneity.

    U. Schurr;A. Walter;U. Rascher

  • A method to construct dose–response curves for a wide range of environmental factors and plant traits by means of a meta-analysis of phenotypic data

    Hendrik Poorter;Ülo Niinemets;Achim Walter;Fabio Fiorani

  • The Effects of Elevated CO2 Concentration on Soybean Gene Expression. An Analysis of Growing and Mature Leaves

    Elizabeth A. Ainsworth;Alistair Rogers;Alistair Rogers;Lila O. Vodkin;Achim Walter

  • Remote, aerial phenotyping of maize traits with a mobile multi-sensor approach

    Frank Liebisch;Norbert Kirchgessner;David Schneider;Achim Walter

  • The ETH field phenotyping platform FIP: A cable-suspended multi-sensor system

    Norbert Kirchgessner;Frank Liebisch;Kang Yu;Johannes Pfeifer

  • Artificial macropores attract crop roots and enhance plant productivity on compacted soils.

    Tino Colombi;Serge Braun;Thomas Keller;Achim Walter

  • Spatio-temporal leaf growth patterns of Arabidopsis thaliana and evidence for sugar control of the diel leaf growth cycle

    A. Wiese;M. M. Christ;O. Virnich;U. Schurr

  • Adapting crop management practices to climate change: Modeling optimal solutions at the field scale

    Niklaus Lehmann;Robert Finger;Tommy Klein;Pierluigi Calanca

  • Leaf development in Ricinus communis during drought stress: dynamics of growth processes, of cellular structure and of sink–source transition

    U. Schurr;U. Heckenberger;K. Herdel;A. Walter

  • Diel time-courses of leaf growth in monocot and dicot species: endogenous rhythms and temperature effects

    Richard Poire;Anika Wiese-Klinkenberg;Boris Parent;Michael Mielewczik

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrich Schurr
Ulrich Schurr Forschungszentrum Jülich
Andreas Hund
Andreas Hund ETH Zurich
Kerstin Nagel
Kerstin Nagel Forschungszentrum Jülich
Bruno Studer
Bruno Studer ETH Zurich
Uwe Rascher
Uwe Rascher Forschungszentrum Jülich
Juan Nieto
Juan Nieto Microsoft (United States)
Thomas Keller
Thomas Keller Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Cyrill Stachniss
Cyrill Stachniss University of Bonn
Shizue Matsubara
Shizue Matsubara Forschungszentrum Jülich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Achim Walter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles