World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
38
Citations
5207
World Ranking
4424
National Ranking
277

Kerstin Nagel publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kerstin Nagel sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 138 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Kerstin Nagel D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kerstin Nagel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • GROWSCREEN-Rhizo is a novel phenotyping robot enabling simultaneous measurements of root and shoot growth for plants grown in soil-filled rhizotrons

    Kerstin A. Nagel;Alexander Putz;Frank Gilmer;Kathrin Heinz

  • Simultaneous phenotyping of leaf growth and chlorophyll fluorescence via GROWSCREEN FLUORO allows detection of stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and other rosette plants.

    Marcus Jansen;Frank Gilmer;Bernhard Biskup;Kerstin A Nagel

  • Temperature responses of roots: impact on growth, root system architecture and implications for phenotyping.

    Kerstin A. Nagel;Bernd Kastenholz;Siegfried Jahnke;Dagmar van Dusschoten

  • Dynamics of seedling growth acclimation towards altered light conditions can be quantified via GROWSCREEN: a setup and procedure designed for rapid optical phenotyping of different plant species.

    Achim Walter;Hanno Scharr;Frank Gilmer;Rainer Zierer

  • Crop Improvement from Phenotyping Roots: Highlights Reveal Expanding Opportunities.

    Saoirse R. Tracy;Kerstin A. Nagel;Johannes A. Postma;Heike Fassbender

  • Non-invasive approaches for phenotyping of enhanced performance traits in bean

    Uwe Rascher;Stephan Blossfeld;Fabio Fiorani;Siegfried Jahnke

  • Recovery dynamics of growth, photosynthesis and carbohydrate accumulation after de-submergence: a comparison between two wetland plants showing escape and quiescence strategies

    Fang-Li Luo;Kerstin A. Nagel;Hanno Scharr;Bo Zeng

  • Screening for drought tolerance of maize hybrids by multi-scale analysis of root and shoot traits at the seedling stage

    Viktoriya Avramova;Kerstin A. Nagel;Hamada AbdElgawad;Dolores Bustos

  • Dynamics of root growth stimulation in Nicotiana tabacum in increasing light intensity.

    Kerstin A. Nagel;Ulrich Schurr;Achim Walter

  • Succession of the sea-surface microlayer in the coastal Baltic Sea under natural and experimentally induced low-wind conditions

    C. Stolle;Kerstin Nagel;M. Labrenz;K. Jürgens

  • Plant root tortuosity: an indicator of root path formation in soil with different composition and density.

    Liyana Popova;Dagmar van Dusschoten;Kerstin A. Nagel;Fabio Fiorani

  • Spatio-temporal quantification of differential growth processes in root growth zones based on a novel combination of image sequence processing and refined concepts describing curvature production.

    Andrés Chavarría-Krauser;Andrés Chavarría-Krauser;Andrés Chavarría-Krauser;Kerstin A. Nagel;Klaus Palme;Ulrich Schurr

  • Impact of domestication on the phenotypic architecture of durum wheat under contrasting nitrogen fertilization

    Tania Gioia;Kerstin A. Nagel;Romina Beleggia;Mariagiovanna Fragasso

  • Cooperative action of the paralogous maize lateral organ boundaries (LOB) domain proteins RTCS and RTCL in shoot-borne root formation.

    Changzheng Xu;Changzheng Xu;Huanhuan Tai;Muhammad Saleem;Yvonne Ludwig

  • Root-root interactions: extending our perspective to be more inclusive of the range of theories in ecology and agriculture using in-vivo analyses

    Marc Faget;Kerstin A. Nagel;Achim Walter;Achim Walter;Juan M. Herrera

  • Photosynthetic acclimation is important for post-submergence recovery of photosynthesis and growth in two riparian species.

    Fang-Li Luo;Kerstin A. Nagel;Bo Zeng;Ulrich Schurr

  • ENHANCED GRAVITROPISM 2 encodes a STERILE ALPHA MOTIF-containing protein that controls root growth angle in barley and wheat.

    Gwendolyn K Kirschner;Serena Rosignoli;Li Guo;Isaia Vardanega;Isaia Vardanega

  • Sowing Density: A Neglected Factor Fundamentally Affecting Root Distribution and Biomass Allocation of Field Grown Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)

    Vera L. Hecht;Vicky M. Temperton;Vicky M. Temperton;Kerstin A. Nagel;Uwe Rascher

  • Root angle is controlled by EGT1 in cereal crops employing an antigravitropic mechanism

    Unknown

  • Spring barley shows dynamic compensatory root and shoot growth responses when exposed to localised soil compaction and fertilisation.

    Johannes Pfeifer;Marc Faget;Achim Walter;Stephan Blossfeld

Frequent Co-Authors

Fabio Fiorani
Fabio Fiorani Forschungszentrum Jülich
Ulrich Schurr
Ulrich Schurr Forschungszentrum Jülich
Achim Walter
Achim Walter ETH Zurich
Michelle Watt
Michelle Watt University of Melbourne
Uwe Rascher
Uwe Rascher Forschungszentrum Jülich
Vicky M. Temperton
Vicky M. Temperton Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Shizue Matsubara
Shizue Matsubara Forschungszentrum Jülich
Johannes A. Postma
Johannes A. Postma Forschungszentrum Jülich
Frank Hochholdinger
Frank Hochholdinger University of Bonn
Roberto Tuberosa
Roberto Tuberosa University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kerstin Nagel

Recently Published Articles