World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 50 2196 2025 204 203 123 7305

Fanjun Chen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fanjun Chen between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fanjun Chen published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2023. 9 of the 132 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2023. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 2 publications
2003 2025

132 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fanjun Chen: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 2
2005 3
2006 1
2007 4
2008 4
2009 2
2010 4
2011 4
2012 9
2013 10
2014 5
2015 9
2016 8
2017 3
2018 6
2019 6
2020 8
2021 9
2022 9
2023 15
2024 7
2025 2
Total 132
Download as CSV

Fanjun Chen publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fanjun Chen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–125 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 123 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233 123
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Fanjun Chen D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fanjun Chen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122 50
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Agronomy

Agronomy, Shoot, Cultivar, Lateral root and Nitrate are his primary areas of study. The Agronomy study combines topics in areas such as Quantitative trait locus, Plant nutrition and Inbred strain. His Shoot research integrates issues from Poaceae and Root system.

Fanjun Chen usually deals with Cultivar and limits it to topics linked to Hybrid and Grain yield and Field experiment. His study looks at the intersection of Lateral root and topics like Seedling with Hydroponics, Genotype and Zea mays. His work in the fields of Meristem overlaps with other areas such as Elongation.

His most cited work include:

  • Inhibition of maize root growth by high nitrate supply is correlated with reduced IAA levels in roots (163 citations)
  • Rhizosphere effect and root growth of two maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes with contrasting P efficiency at low P availability (128 citations)
  • Genetic Analysis of Maize Root Characteristics in Response to Low Nitrogen Stress (102 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Fanjun Chen mainly focuses on Agronomy, Cultivar, Hybrid, Shoot and Horticulture. His study in Agronomy is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Quantitative trait locus and Inbred strain. His Cultivar research focuses on Field experiment and how it relates to Yield.

His Hybrid study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Dry matter and Crop yield. His Shoot study incorporates themes from Lateral root and Crown. He interconnects Photosynthesis and Plant physiology in the investigation of issues within Horticulture.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (67.50%)
  • Cultivar (22.50%)
  • Hybrid (20.00%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Cultivar (22.50%)
  • Agronomy (67.50%)
  • Sowing (7.50%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Cultivar, Agronomy, Sowing, Gene and Animal science. Field experiment, Low nitrogen and Primordium is closely connected to Grain yield in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Cultivar. In the field of Agronomy, his study on Plant density and Interaction overlaps with subjects such as Nitrate and Ammonium.

Fanjun Chen focuses mostly in the field of Gene, narrowing it down to matters related to Cell biology and, in some cases, Arabidopsis, Lateral root, Genetic redundancy, Lateral root branching and MADS-box. His research integrates issues of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Intensive farming and Hypha in his study of Animal science. In his work, Botany, Transposable element, Shoot and Crown is strongly intertwined with Transcription factor, which is a subfield of Mutant.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Interaction effect of nitrogen form and planting density on plant growth and nutrient uptake in maize seedlings (12 citations)
  • ZmRAP2.7, an AP2 Transcription Factor, Is Involved in Maize Brace Roots Development. (9 citations)
  • Increased biomass accumulation in maize grown in mixed nitrogen supply is mediated by auxin synthesis. (9 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

His main research concerns Nitrate, Ammonium, Photosynthesis, Sowing and Root system. Nitrate is connected with Agronomy, Interaction, Asparagine, Food science and Glutamate synthase in his study. There are a combination of areas like Asparagine Synthase and Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase integrated together with his Ammonium study.

The concepts of his Sowing study are interwoven with issues in Biomass and Plant physiology. The study incorporates disciplines such as Transcription factor, Gene, Mutant, Transposable element and Shoot in addition to Root system.

Best Publications

  • Inhibition of maize root growth by high nitrate supply is correlated with reduced IAA levels in roots

    Qiuying Tian;Fanjun Chen;Jinxin Liu;Fusuo Zhang

  • Rhizosphere effect and root growth of two maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes with contrasting P efficiency at low P availability

    Yan Liu;Guohua Mi;Fanjun Chen;Jianhua Zhang

  • Modern maize hybrids in Northeast China exhibit increased yield potential and resource use efficiency despite adverse climate change

    Xiaochao Chen;Fanjun Chen;Yanling Chen;Qiang Gao

  • Genetic Analysis of Maize Root Characteristics in Response to Low Nitrogen Stress

    Liang Chun;Guohua Mi;Jiansheng Li;Fanjun Chen

  • Ideotype root architecture for efficient nitrogen acquisition by maize in intensive cropping systems.

    GuoHua Mi;FanJun Chen;QiuPing Wu;NingWei Lai

  • Within-Leaf Nitrogen Allocation in Adaptation to Low Nitrogen Supply in Maize during Grain-Filling Stage

    Xiaohuan Mu;Qinwu Chen;Fanjun Chen;Lixing Yuan

  • Effects of nitrogen application rate on grain yield and grain nitrogen concentration in two maize hybrids with contrasting nitrogen remobilization efficiency

    Yanling Chen;Changxin Xiao;Dali Wu;Tingting Xia

  • A genetic relationship between nitrogen use efficiency and seedling root traits in maize as revealed by QTL analysis

    Pengcheng Li;Fanjun Chen;Hongguang Cai;Jianchao Liu

  • A comprehensive analysis of root morphological changes and nitrogen allocation in maize in response to low nitrogen stress.

    Kun Gao;Fanjun Chen;Lixing Yuan;Fusuo Zhang

  • Characterization of the plant traits contributed to high grain yield and high grain nitrogen concentration in maize

    Yanling Chen;Changxin Xiao;Xiaochao Chen;Qian Li

  • Response of root morphology to nitrate supply and its contribution to nitrogen accumulation in maize

    Yan Wang;Guohua Mi;Fanjun Chen;Jianhua Zhang

  • Genome-wide dissection of changes in maize root system architecture during modern breeding

    Unknown

  • Ammonium inhibits primary root growth by reducing the length of meristem and elongation zone and decreasing elemental expansion rate in the root apex in Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Ying Liu;Ningwei Lai;Kun Gao;Fanjun Chen

  • Mapping QTLs for root traits under different nitrate levels at the seedling stage in maize ( Zea mays L.)

    Jianchao Liu;Jiansheng Li;Fanjun Chen;Fusuo Zhang

  • Mycorrhizal responsiveness of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes as related to releasing date and available P content in soil

    Qun Chu;Xinxin Wang;Yang Yang;Fanjun Chen

  • The Mycorrhiza-Specific Ammonium Transporter ZmAMT3;1 Mediates Mycorrhiza-dependent Nitrogen Uptake in Maize Roots.

    Unknown

  • Mapping QTLs for root system architecture of maize (Zea mays L.) in the field at different developmental stages.

    Hongguang Cai;Fanjun Chen;Guohua Mi;Fusuo Zhang

  • Genetic improvement of root growth increases maize yield via enhanced post-silking nitrogen uptake

    Xiaohuan Mu;Fanjun Chen;Qiuping Wu;Qinwu Chen

  • Root size and nitrogen‐uptake activity in two maize (Zea mays) inbred lines differing in nitrogen‐use efficiency

    Jinxin Liu;Fanjun Chen;Chunliang Olokhnuud;A. D. M. Glass

  • Identification of quantitative trait loci for leaf area and chlorophyll content in maize (Zea mays) under low nitrogen and low phosphorus supply

    Hongguang Cai;Qun Chu;Lixing Yuan;Jianchao Liu

  • Possible involvement of cytokinin in nitrate-mediated root growth in maize

    Qiuying Tian;Fanjun Chen;Fusuo Zhang;Guohua Mi

Frequent Co-Authors

Guohua Mi
Guohua Mi China Agricultural University
Lixing Yuan
Lixing Yuan China Agricultural University
Fusuo Zhang
Fusuo Zhang China Agricultural University
Guido Schnabel
Guido Schnabel Clemson University
Zhenling Cui
Zhenling Cui China Agricultural University
Dongdong Li
Dongdong Li Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Xinping Chen
Xinping Chen Southwest University
Chunjian Li
Chunjian Li China Agricultural University
Jianhua Zhang
Jianhua Zhang Hong Kong Baptist University
Tobias Würschum
Tobias Würschum University of Hohenheim

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Fanjun Chen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles