World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
24252
World Ranking
16645
National Ranking
8355

Peter J. Jannetta publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Jannetta sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 241 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter J. Jannetta D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Jannetta sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter J. Jannetta was affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their career included contributions to academic research associated with this institution.

Although specific details on their research publications, including recent papers, are not available, the data reflects no listed paper titles, publication years, venues, or citation counts. Information regarding co-authors and frequent publication venues was also not documented.

There is no record of book publications or outlined main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work within the provided dataset.

Data on awards and honors received is absent, and no exact years or award titles have been provided. The scientist is recorded as deceased.

Best Publications

  • The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia

    Fred G. Barker;Peter J. Jannetta;David J. Bissonette;Mark V. Larkins

  • Arterial Compression of the Trigeminal Nerve at the Pons in Patients with Trigeminal Neuralgia

    Peter J. Jannetta

  • Microvascular decompression of cranial nerves: lessons learned after 4400 operations

    Mark R. McLaughlin;Peter J. Jannetta;Brent L. Clyde;Brian R. Subach

  • Transplantation of cultured human neuronal cells for patients with stroke

    D. Kondziolka;L. Wechsler;S. Goldstein;C. Meltzer

  • Etiology and definitive microsurgical treatment of hemifacial spasm: Operative techniques and results in 47 patients

    Peter J. Jannetta;Munir Abbasy;Joseph C. Maroon;Francisco M. Ramos

  • Neurovascular compression in cranial nerve and systemic disease.

    Peter J. Jannetta

  • Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm

    Fred G. Barker;Peter J. Jannetta;David J. Bissonette;Philip T. Shields

  • Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease: Part 1: Treatment of lateral cervical disc herniation in 253 cases

    Lunsford Ld;Bissonette Dj;Jannetta Pj;Sheptak Pe

  • Microvascular decompression surgery in the United States, 1996 to 2000: mortality rates, morbidity rates, and the effects of hospital and surgeon volumes.

    Steven N. Kalkanis;Emad N. Eskandar;Bob S. Carter;Fred G. Barker

  • Outcome analysis of acoustic neuroma management: a comparison of microsurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery.

    B E Pollock;L D Lunsford;D Kondziolka;J C Flickinger

  • Disabling Positional Vertigo

    Peter J. Jannetta;Margareta B. Møller;Aage R. Møller

  • Microvascular relations of the trigeminal nerve. An anatomical study with clinical correlation.

    Stephen J. Haines;Peter J. Jannetta;David S. Zorub

  • Neurogenic hypertension: etiology and surgical treatment. I. Observations in 53 patients.

    Peter J. Jannetta;Ricardo Segal;Sidney K. Wolfson

  • Meningiomas Involving the Clivus: A Six-Year Experience with 41 Patients

    Laligam N. Sekhar;Peter J. Jannetta;Lois E. Burkhart;Janine E. Janosky

  • Intracranially recorded responses from the human auditory nerve: New insights into the origin of brain stem evoked potentials (BSEPs)

    Aage R. Møller;Peter Jannetta;Marvin Bennett;Margareta B. Møller

  • Prevention of reactivated herpes simplex infection by human leukocyte interferon after operation on the trigeminal root.

    George J. Pazin;John A. Armstrong;Man Tai Lam;George C. Tarr

  • Intraoperative monitoring of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials

    Betty L. Grundy;Peter J. Jannetta;Phyllis T. Procopio;Agnes Lina

  • Preservation of facial function during removal of acoustic neuromas: Use of monopolar constant-voltage stimulation and EMG

    Aage R. Møller;Peter J. Jannetta

  • On the origin of synkinesis in hemifacial spasm: results of intracranial recordings

    Aage R. Møller;Peter J. Jannetta

  • Microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia.

    Daniel K. Resnick;Peter J. Jannetta;David Bissonnette;Hae Dong Jho

Frequent Co-Authors

Aage R. Møller
Aage R. Møller The University of Texas at Dallas
Elad I. Levy
Elad I. Levy University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Howard Yonas
Howard Yonas University of New Mexico
Fred G. Barker
Fred G. Barker Harvard University
Douglas Kondziolka
Douglas Kondziolka New York University
L. Dade Lunsford
L. Dade Lunsford University of Pittsburgh
Monto Ho
Monto Ho University of Pittsburgh
Amin B. Kassam
Amin B. Kassam Neeka Health
Kim J. Burchiel
Kim J. Burchiel Oregon Health & Science University
Bruce E. Pollock
Bruce E. Pollock Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in alternative routes to a medical career or complementary healthcare fields, online degree programs offer flexible and affordable options. Many aspiring healthcare professionals begin their journey with nursing degrees, which have a range of accessible pathways.

Entry-level candidates may explore programs widely regarded as the easiest nursing programs to get into to launch their nursing careers. Those already holding an RN license and seeking to advance can benefit from the cheapest rn to bsn online options to earn a bachelor’s degree in nursing.

For individuals with a non-nursing background, online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors allow for a direct path to a master’s in nursing, widening career choices without starting over. For advanced practice or academic teaching roles, the online phd nursing degree offers opportunities to reach the highest levels in nursing practice and research.

These related online degrees and pathways can be excellent alternatives or additions to studying traditional medicine in the USA, helping students tailor their career to their interests and life circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Jannetta

Recently Published Articles