World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
16064
World Ranking
4637
National Ranking
1712

Peter J. Gleckler publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Gleckler sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 104 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter J. Gleckler D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Gleckler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter J. Gleckler is affiliated with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the United States. Their research broadly focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science, encompassing 28 and 24 publications respectively in these fields.

The scientist's work extensively covers subfields such as Atmospheric Science, with 25 publications, Global and Planetary Change (24 publications), Oceanography (3 publications), Plant Science, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

Key topics addressed in their research include Climate variability and models, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, Hydrology and Drought Analysis, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, and Precipitation Measurement and Analysis.

Their publication record features notable papers including:

  • "Evaluating Climate Models with the CLIVAR 2020 ENSO Metrics Package," 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "MJO Propagation Across the Maritime Continent: Are CMIP6 Models Better Than CMIP5 Models?," 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Characterization of long period return values of extreme daily temperature and precipitation in the CMIP6 models: Part 1, model evaluation," 2020, Weather and Climate Extremes
  • "Evaluation of extreme sub-daily precipitation in high-resolution global climate model simulations," 2021, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • "Robust Evaluation of ENSO in Climate Models: How Many Ensemble Members Are Needed?," 2021, Geophysical Research Letters

Frequent co-authors in Gleckler's research collaborations include Jiwoo Lee, Min-Seop Ahn, Paul Ullrich, Ana C. Ordoñez, and Yann Planton.

The scientist has published repeatedly in several venues, with multiple publications in:

  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Climate
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Weather and Climate Extremes

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of climate models

    G. M. Flato;J. Marotzke;B. Abiodun;Pascale Braconnot

  • Performance metrics for climate models

    P. J. Gleckler;K. E. Taylor;C. Doutriaux

  • Improved estimates of upper-ocean warming and multi-decadal sea-level rise

    Catia M. Domingues;John A. Church;John A. Church;Neil J. White;Neil J. White;Peter J. Gleckler

  • An Overview of the Results of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP I)

    W. Lawrence Gates;James S. Boyle;Curt Covey;Clyde G. Dease

  • Selecting global climate models for regional climate change studies

    David W. Pierce;Tim P. Barnett;Benjamin D. Santer;Peter J. Gleckler

  • Taking climate model evaluation to the next level

    Veronika Eyring;Veronika Eyring;Peter M. Cox;Gregory M. Flato;Peter J. Gleckler

  • Penetration of Human-Induced Warming into the World's Oceans

    Tim P. Barnett;David W. Pierce;Krishna M. AchutaRao;Peter J. Gleckler

  • OMIP contribution to CMIP6: experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project

    Stephen M. Griffies;Gokhan Danabasoglu;Paul J. Durack;Alistair J. Adcroft

  • Identification of human-induced changes in atmospheric moisture content

    B. D. Santer;C. Mears;F. J. Wentz;K. E. Taylor

  • Consistency of modelled and observed temperature trends in the tropical troposphere

    B. D. Santer;P. W. Thorne;L. Haimberger;K. E. Taylor

  • Amplification of Surface Temperature Trends and Variability in the Tropical Atmosphere

    Benjamin D. Santer;Tom M. L. Wigley;Carl Mears;Frank J. Wentz

  • The effect of horizontal resolution on simulation quality in the Community Atmospheric Model, CAM5.1

    Michael F. Wehner;Kevin A. Reed;Fuyu Li;Prabhat

  • Are climate model simulations of clouds improving? An evaluation using the ISCCP simulator

    Stephen A. Klein;Yuying Zhang;Mark D. Zelinka;Robert Pincus

  • Separating signal and noise in atmospheric temperature changes: The importance of timescale

    Benjamin D. Santer;Carl A. Mears;C. Doutriaux;Peter Caldwell

  • Forced and unforced ocean temperature changes in Atlantic and Pacific tropical cyclogenesis regions

    B. D. Santer;T. M. L. Wigley;P. J. Gleckler;C. Bonfils

  • Evaluating Climate Models with the CLIVAR 2020 ENSO Metrics Package

    Yann Y. Planton;Eric Guilyardi;Andrew T. Wittenberg;Jiwoo Lee

  • Good Practice Guidance Paper on Assessing and Combining Multi Model Climate Projections

    R. Knutti;G. Abramowitz;M. Collins;V. Eyring

  • Incorporating model quality information in climate change detection and attribution studies

    B. D. Santer;K. E. Taylor;P. J. Gleckler;C. Bonfils

  • Industrial-era global ocean heat uptake doubles in recent decades

    Peter J. Gleckler;Paul J. Durack;Ronald J. Stouffer;Gregory C. Johnson

  • ESMValTool (v1.0) – a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP

    Veronika Eyring;Mattia Righi;Axel Lauer;Martin Evaldsson

  • Quantifying underestimates of long-term upper-ocean warming

    Paul J. Durack;Peter J. Gleckler;Felix W. Landerer;Karl E. Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl E. Taylor
Karl E. Taylor Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Veronika Eyring
Veronika Eyring University of Bremen
Michael F. Wehner
Michael F. Wehner Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Tim P. Barnett
Tim P. Barnett Scripps Institution of Oceanography
David W. Pierce
David W. Pierce University of California, San Diego
Benjamin D. Santer
Benjamin D. Santer Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Kenneth R. Sperber
Kenneth R. Sperber Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Gerald A. Meehl
Gerald A. Meehl National Center for Atmospheric Research
Tom M. L. Wigley
Tom M. L. Wigley University of Adelaide
Carl A. Mears
Carl A. Mears Remote Sensing Systems (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a diverse range of career paths, often intertwining with public administration, sociology, and education. For those looking to influence environmental policy and management, pursuing an mpa one year program can provide essential skills in governance and leadership. This path is ideal for professionals eager to make impactful decisions quickly without long-term study commitments.

Understanding societal influences on environmental issues is crucial. Earning a sociology bachelor degree online can deepen insights into human behavior, helping students analyze how social factors affect environmental challenges and sustainability efforts.

For those dedicated to advanced research or academic leadership, exploring online doctoral programs without dissertation offers a streamlined path to doctoral credentials. These programs can be especially appealing for environmental educators seeking flexible yet rigorous study options.

Additionally, many professionals transition from an EdS to EdD with eds to edd programs online, combining practical expertise with advanced educational leadership. This pathway supports those aiming to lead educational initiatives that promote environmental awareness at all levels.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Gleckler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles