World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
13218
World Ranking
7896
National Ranking
2802

Kenneth R. Sperber publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth R. Sperber sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 115 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Kenneth R. Sperber D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth R. Sperber sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth R. Sperber is affiliated with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental and earth sciences, with significant contributions in the fields of climate variability and models, atmospheric science, and global and planetary change. Sperber's work spans several related subfields including meteorological phenomena and simulations, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, and plant responses to elevated CO2.

The scientist has contributed to numerous publications, frequently collaborating with coauthors such as Jiwoo Lee, Peter J. Gleckler, Min-Seop Ahn, Daehyun Kim, and Yann Planton. Their research output includes articles published in prominent scientific venues, reflecting a diverse range of topics within climate science and modeling.

Some of the notable recent papers by Sperber include:

  • "MJO Propagation Across the Maritime Continent: Are CMIP6 Models Better Than CMIP5 Models?", 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Robust Evaluation of ENSO in Climate Models: How Many Ensemble Members Are Needed?", 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Representation of Modes of Variability in Six U.S. Climate Models", 2020, Journal of Climate
  • "Systematic and objective evaluation of Earth system models: PCMDI Metrics Package (PMP) version 3", 2024, Geoscientific Model Development
  • "Benchmarking performance changes in the simulation of extratropical modes of variability across CMIP generations", 2021, Journal of Climate

Sperber's frequent coauthors include:

  • Jiwoo Lee
  • Peter J. Gleckler
  • Min-Seop Ahn
  • Daehyun Kim
  • Yann Planton

The frequent publication venues for their research are:

  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Climate
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Climate Dynamics

Main fields of study for Sperber's research include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Subfields of study associated with their work are:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Plant Science

The key research topics covered by Sperber encompass:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Plant responses to elevated CO2

Best Publications

  • An Overview of the Results of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP I)

    W. Lawrence Gates;James S. Boyle;Curt Covey;Clyde G. Dease

  • Tropical Intraseasonal Variability in 14 IPCC AR4 Climate Models. Part I: Convective Signals

    Jia Lin Lin;George N. Kiladis;Brian E. Mapes;Klaus M. Weickmann

  • The Asian Summer Monsoon: An Intercomparison of CMIP5 vs. CMIP3 Simulations of the Late 20th Century

    K. R. Sperber;H. Annamalai;I. Kang;A. Kitoh

  • Intraseasonal oscillations in 15 atmospheric general circulation models: results from an AMIP diagnostic subproject

    J. M. Slingo;K. R. Sperber;J. S. Boyle;J.-P. Ceron

  • Climatology and Interannual Variation of the East Asian Winter Monsoon: Results from the 1979-95 NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis

    Yi Zhang;Kenneth R. Sperber;James S. Boyle

  • An Observational Study of the Relationship between Excessively Strong Short Rains in Coastal East Africa and Indian Ocean SST

    Emily Black;Julia Slingo;Kenneth R. Sperber

  • Interannual Tropical Rainfall Variability in General Circulation Model Simulations Associated with the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project

    K. R. Sperber;T. N. Palmer

  • The South Asian Summer Monsoon and Its Relationship with ENSO in the IPCC AR4 Simulations

    H. Annamalai;K. Hamilton;K. R. Sperber

  • MJO Simulation Diagnostics

    D Waliser;K Sperber;H Hendon;D Kim

  • STOIC: a study of coupled model climatology and variability in tropical ocean regions

    M. K. Davey;M. Huddleston;K. R. Sperber;P. Braconnot

  • Application of MJO Simulation Diagnostics to Climate Models

    D. Kim;K. Sperber;W. Stern;D. Waliser

  • On the predictability of the interannual behaviour of the Madden‐Julian oscillation and its relationship with el Nin̄o

    J. M. Slingo;D. P. Rowell;K. R. Sperber;F. Nortley

  • ENSIP: The El Niño simulation intercomparison project

    Mojib Latif;K. Sperber;J. Arblaster;P. Braconnot

  • The mean evolution and variability of the Asian summer monsoon: comparison of ECMWF and NCEP/NCAR reanalyses

    H. Annamalai;J. M. Slingo;K. R. Sperber;K. Hodges

  • ENSO Simulation in Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Models: Are the Current Models Better?

    Krishna AchutaRao;Kenneth R. Sperber

  • Tropical air-sea interaction in general circulation models

    J. D. Neelin;Mojib Latif;M. A. F. Allaart;M. A. Cane

  • The effect of horizontal resolution on simulation quality in the Community Atmospheric Model, CAM5.1

    Michael F. Wehner;Kevin A. Reed;Fuyu Li;Prabhat

  • Regional Heat Sources and the Active and Break Phases of Boreal Summer Intraseasonal (30–50 Day) Variability*

    H. Annamalai;K. R. Sperber

  • Propagation and the Vertical Structure of the Madden Julian Oscillation

    Kenneth R. Sperber

  • Predictability and the relationship between subseasonal and interannual variability during the Asian summer monsoon

    Kenneth R. Sperber;Julia M. Slingo;H. Annamalai

Frequent Co-Authors

Duane E. Waliser
Duane E. Waliser Jet Propulsion Lab
Daehyun Kim
Daehyun Kim University of Washington
Julia Slingo
Julia Slingo University of Bristol
Matthew C. Wheeler
Matthew C. Wheeler Bureau of Meteorology
Harry H. Hendon
Harry H. Hendon Bureau of Meteorology
H. Annamalai
H. Annamalai University of Hawaii at Manoa
Eric D. Maloney
Eric D. Maloney Colorado State University
Peter J. Gleckler
Peter J. Gleckler Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Klaus M. Weickmann
Klaus M. Weickmann National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Wanqiu Wang
Wanqiu Wang National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in environmental sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. For professionals interested in leadership roles within education or policy, exploring edd no dissertation programs can provide a practical, research-based approach without the lengthy dissertation commitment.

Those seeking advancement from a master's level often benefit from an eds to edd bridge program, which offers a streamlined transition into doctoral studies focused on education leadership, perfectly complementing environmental science educators who want to deepen their expertise.

Social work intersects significantly with environmental justice and community support. Online dsw online programs enable learners to specialize in social dimensions of environmental challenges, equipping graduates to serve vulnerable populations impacted by ecological changes.

For those uncertain about committing to a specialized field immediately, enrolling in best affordable online general studies degree programs offers flexibility. These programs provide a broad academic foundation while allowing students to tailor their studies to environmental science interests over time.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth R. Sperber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles