World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 49 5231 5010 1924 1778 141 9174

Daehyun Kim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daehyun Kim between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daehyun Kim published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2024. 53 of the 213 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2024. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 23 publications
2005 2025

213 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daehyun Kim: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 5
2009 5
2010 1
2011 6
2012 10
2013 6
2014 14
2015 11
2016 3
2017 9
2018 12
2019 9
2020 19
2021 17
2022 8
2023 21
2024 30
2025 23
Total 213
Download as CSV

Daehyun Kim publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daehyun Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 141 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541 141
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Daehyun Kim D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daehyun Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273 49
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Daehyun Kim is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and focuses research in Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their work spans major subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Oceanography, with additional contributions in Aerospace Engineering and Economics and Econometrics.

The research topics covered by Daehyun Kim predominantly include Climate Variability and Models, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research. Further areas of investigation include Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, and Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing.

Publication venues frequented by Daehyun Kim reflect these areas of expertise and include:

  • Journal of Climate
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Recent papers authored by or involving Daehyun Kim include:

  • "GISS-E2.1: Configurations and Climatology," 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Fifty Years of Research on the Madden-Julian Oscillation: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives," 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Clouds and Convective Self-Aggregation in a Multimodel Ensemble of Radiative-Convective Equilibrium Simulations," 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "MJO Propagation Across the Maritime Continent: Are CMIP6 Models Better Than CMIP5 Models?," 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "CMIP6 Historical Simulations (1850-2014) With GISS-E2.1," 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

Frequent collaborators with Daehyun Kim include:

  • Eric D. Maloney
  • Suzana J. Camargo
  • Daehyun Kang
  • Yoo-Geun Ham
  • Soon-Il An

Best Publications

  • GISS-E2.1: Configurations and Climatology.

    Maxwell Kelley;Gavin A. Schmidt;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Susanne E. Bauer

  • MJO Simulation Diagnostics

    D Waliser;K Sperber;H Hendon;D Kim

  • Application of MJO Simulation Diagnostics to Climate Models

    D. Kim;K. Sperber;W. Stern;D. Waliser

  • Vertical structure and physical processes of the Madden-Julian oscillation: exploring key model physics in climate simulations

    Xianan Jiang;Xianan Jiang;Duane E. Waliser;Duane E. Waliser;Prince K. Xavier;Jon Petch

  • MJO and Convectively Coupled Equatorial Waves Simulated by CMIP5 Climate Models

    Meng-Pai Hung;Jia-Lin Lin;Wanqiu Wang;Daehyun Kim

  • The MJO as a Dispersive, Convectively Coupled Moisture Wave: Theory and Observations

    Ángel F. Adames;Daehyun Kim

  • Propagating versus Nonpropagating Madden–Julian Oscillation Events

    Daehyun Kim;Jong-Seong Kug;Adam H. Sobel

  • Moist Static Energy Budget of the MJO during DYNAMO

    Adam H. Sobel;Shuguang Wang;Daehyun Kim

  • Fifty Years of Research on the Madden-Julian Oscillation: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives

    Xianan Jiang;Xianan Jiang;Ángel F. Adames;Daehyun Kim;Eric D. Maloney

  • The MJO Transition from Shallow to Deep Convection in CloudSat/CALIPSO Data and GISS GCM Simulations

    Anthony D. Del Genio;Yonghua Chen;Daehyun Kim;Mao-Sung Yao

  • Twofold expansion of the Indo-Pacific warm pool warps the MJO life cycle.

    M. K. Roxy;M. K. Roxy;Panini Dasgupta;Panini Dasgupta;Michael J. McPhaden;Tamaki Suematsu

  • A Systematic Relationship between Intraseasonal Variability and Mean State Bias in AGCM Simulations

    Daehyun Kim;Adam H. Sobel;Eric D. Maloney;Dargan M. W. Frierson

  • Clouds and Convective Self-Aggregation in a Multimodel Ensemble of Radiative-Convective Equilibrium Simulations.

    Allison A. Wing;Catherine L. Stauffer;Tobias Becker;Kevin A. Reed

  • The Tropical Subseasonal Variability Simulated in the NASA GISS General Circulation Model

    Daehyun Kim;Adam H. Sobel;Adam H. Sobel;Anthony D. Del Genio;Yonghua Chen;Yonghua Chen

  • Predictability and Prediction Skill of the MJO in Two Operational Forecasting Systems

    Hye-Mi Kim;Peter J. Webster;Violeta E. Toma;Daehyun Kim

  • MJO simulation in CMIP5 climate models: MJO skill metrics and process-oriented diagnosis

    Min-Seop Ahn;Daehyun Kim;Kenneth R. Sperber;In-Sik Kang;In-Sik Kang

  • CMIP6 Historical Simulations (1850–2014) With GISS‐E2.1

    Ron L. Miller;Ron L. Miller;Gavin A. Schmidt;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Susanne E. Bauer

  • MJO Propagation Across the Maritime Continent: Are CMIP6 Models Better Than CMIP5 Models?

    Min-Seop Ahn;Min-Seop Ahn;Daehyun Kim;Daehyun Kang;Jiwoo Lee

  • MJO Prediction Skill of the Subseasonal-to-Seasonal Prediction Models

    Yuna Lim;Seok-Woo Son;Daehyun Kim

  • Cluster analysis of tropical cyclone tracks in the Southern Hemisphere

    Hamish A. Ramsay;Suzana J. Camargo;Daehyun Kim

  • Characteristics of Tropical Cyclones in High-resolution Models in the Present Climate

    Daniel A. Shaevitz;Suzana J. Camargo;Adam H. Sobel;Jeffrey A. Jonas

  • The Impacts of Convective Parameterization and Moisture Triggering on AGCM-Simulated Convectively Coupled Equatorial Waves

    Jia-Lin Lin;Myong-In Lee;Daehyun Kim;In-Sik Kang

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam H. Sobel
Adam H. Sobel Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
In-Sik Kang
In-Sik Kang Second Institute of Oceanography
Duane E. Waliser
Duane E. Waliser Jet Propulsion Lab
Eric D. Maloney
Eric D. Maloney Colorado State University
Suzana J. Camargo
Suzana J. Camargo Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Jong-Seong Kug
Jong-Seong Kug Seoul National University
Kenneth R. Sperber
Kenneth R. Sperber Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Ming Zhao
Ming Zhao Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Myong-In Lee
Myong-In Lee Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology
Siegfried D. Schubert
Siegfried D. Schubert Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and deepen interdisciplinary knowledge. Many online sociology bachelor programs offer insights into human-environment interactions, essential for careers in sustainability and environmental policy. Programs like these provide a strong foundation for understanding societal impacts on the environment.

Educators looking to integrate environmental topics into their curriculum may consider advanced teaching degrees. Online EdD programs without dissertation requirements offer flexible options for professionals who want to advance their expertise without a traditional research thesis, making them ideal for those balancing work and study. Additionally, many top schools with online EdS to EdD programs provide smooth transitions for educators aiming to attain the highest level of education in their field.

For social workers involved in environmental justice and community health, pursuing a doctorate can enhance their impact. The most affordable online doctorate in social work programs are an accessible pathway to develop leadership skills that address environmental and social challenges.

Exploring these related online degrees can complement a career in Environmental Sciences by integrating social, educational, and policy perspectives necessary for today's complex environmental issues.

Learn more about online sociology bachelor programs, online ed d programs without dissertation, eds to edd programs online, and dsw programs online.

Best Scientists Citing Daehyun Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles