World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
81
Citations
20058
World Ranking
409
National Ranking
135

Paul J. Pinter publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Pinter sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 163 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Paul J. Pinter D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Pinter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Agriculture

His main research concerns Agronomy, Evapotranspiration, Growing season, Remote sensing and Carbon dioxide. The Agronomy study combines topics in areas such as Ecophysiology, Soil fertility and Nitrogen assimilation. His Evapotranspiration study incorporates themes from Biomass, Water use and Energy balance.

Paul J. Pinter combines subjects such as Plant growth and Vegetation with his study of Remote sensing. His Carbon dioxide study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Sorghum, Water-use efficiency, Biomass, Poaceae and Yield. His biological study deals with issues like Soil water, which deal with fields such as Canopy.

His most cited work include:

  • Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator (1211 citations)
  • Remote Sensing for Crop Management (413 citations)
  • Productivity and water use of wheat under free‐air CO2 enrichment (294 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Paul J. Pinter spends much of his time researching Agronomy, Remote sensing, Evapotranspiration, Carbon dioxide and Canopy. Paul J. Pinter works mostly in the field of Agronomy, limiting it down to concerns involving Soil water and, occasionally, Anthesis. His Remote sensing research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Plant cover and Vegetation.

His work carried out in the field of Evapotranspiration brings together such families of science as Energy balance, Water use, Water-use efficiency, Latent heat and Irrigation scheduling. His research in Carbon dioxide intersects with topics in Field experiment, Botany, Sorghum, Stomatal conductance and Transpiration. His study looks at the intersection of Canopy and topics like Biomass with Crop simulation model.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (36.36%)
  • Remote sensing (29.37%)
  • Evapotranspiration (24.48%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2004-2018)?

  • Agronomy (36.36%)
  • Evapotranspiration (24.48%)
  • Soil water (19.58%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Paul J. Pinter mostly deals with Agronomy, Evapotranspiration, Soil water, Irrigation scheduling and Remote sensing. His work carried out in the field of Agronomy brings together such families of science as Carbon dioxide and Nitrogen assimilation. His Evapotranspiration research includes elements of Poaceae and Root system.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Total organic carbon, Carbon cycle and Botany. His Irrigation scheduling study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Vegetation and Crop coefficient. His work on Aerial imagery and Radiometer as part of his general Remote sensing study is frequently connected to Thermal infrared and Field, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.

Between 2004 and 2018, his most popular works were:

  • Nitrate assimilation is inhibited by elevated CO 2 in field-grown wheat (126 citations)
  • COTTON IRRIGATION SCHEDULING USING REMOTELY SENSED AND FAO-56 BASAL CROP COEFFICIENTS (115 citations)
  • Wheat basal crop coefficients determined by normalized difference vegetation index (107 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Agriculture

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Agronomy, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Evapotranspiration, Crop coefficient and Irrigation scheduling. The Agronomy study combines topics in areas such as Stomatal conductance, Ecophysiology and Nitrogen assimilation. Paul J. Pinter has included themes like Endmember and Remote sensing in his Normalized Difference Vegetation Index study.

The various areas that Paul J. Pinter examines in his Evapotranspiration study include Water use, Water balance, Poaceae, Root system and Drought tolerance. His research on Crop coefficient concerns the broader Irrigation. His Irrigation research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Growing season, Statistics, Leaf area index and Polynomial regression.

Best Publications

  • Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator

    R. D. Jackson;S. B. Idso;R. J. Reginato;P. J. Pinter

  • Normalizing the stress-degree-day parameter for environmental variability☆

    Unknown

  • Remote Sensing for Crop Management

    Paul J. Pinter;Jerry L. Hatfield;James S. Schepers;Edward M. Barnes

  • Productivity and water use of wheat under free‐air CO2 enrichment

    Bruce A. Kimball;Paul J. Pinter;Richard L. Garcia;Robert L. LaMORTE

  • Discrimination of growth and water stress in wheat by various vegetation indices through clear and turbid atmospheres.

    R.D. Jackson;P.N. Slater;P.J. Pinter

  • Simulated wheat growth affected by rising temperature, increased water deficit and elevated atmospheric CO2

    S. Asseng;P.D. Jamieson;B. Kimball;P. Pinter

  • Measuring Wheat Senescence with a Digital Camera

    F. J. Adamsen;Paul J. Pinter;Edward M. Barnes;Robert L. LaMorte

  • Estimation of Daily Evapotranspiration from one Time-of-Day Measurements

    R.D. Jackson;J.L. Hatfield;R.J. Reginato;S.B. Idso

  • ESTIMATION OF SOIL HEAT FLUX FROM NET RADIATION DURING THE GROWTH OF ALFALFA

    B.E. Clothier;K.L. Clawson;P.J. Pinter;M.S. Moran

  • Estimating cotton evapotranspiration crop coefficients with a multispectral vegetation index

    Douglas J. Hunsaker;Paul J. Pinter;Edward M. Barnes;Bruce A. Kimball

  • Elevated CO2, drought and soil nitrogen effects on wheat grain quality

    B. A. Kimball;C. F. Morris;P. J. Pinter;G. W. Wall

  • Effects of elevated CO2 and drought on wheat: testing crop simulation models for different experimental and climatic conditions

    F Ewert;D Rodriguez;P Jamieson;M.A Semenov

  • Nitrate assimilation is inhibited by elevated CO 2 in field-grown wheat

    Arnold J. Bloom;Martin Burger;Bruce A. Kimball;Paul J. Pinter

  • Remote sensing for crop protection

    Unknown

  • Free‐air CO2 enrichment and soil nitrogen effects on energy balance and evapotranspiration of wheat

    B. A. Kimball;R. L. LaMorte;P. J. Pinter;G. W. Wall

  • Multisite Analyses of Spectral-Biophysical Data for Wheat

    Unknown

  • Elevated CO2 increases sorghum biomass under drought conditions

    M. J. Ottman;B. A. Kimball;P. J. Pinter;G. W. Wall

  • Effects of Temperature on Leaf Appearance in Spring and Winter Wheat Cultivars1

    J. T. Baker;P. J. Pinter;R. J. Reginato;E. T. Kanemasu

  • Growth and yield of cotton in response to a free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) environment

    Jack R. Mauney;Bruce A. Kimball;Paul J. Pinter;Robert L. LaMorte

  • Wheat basal crop coefficients determined by normalized difference vegetation index

    Douglas J. Hunsaker;Paul J. Pinter;Bruce A. Kimball

  • Elevated atmospheric CO2 improved Sorghum plant water status by ameliorating the adverse effects of drought

    G. W. Wall;T. J. Brooks;N. R. Adam;A. B. Cousins

  • CO2 enrichment increases water-use efficiency in sorghum

    Matthew M. Conley;B. A. Kimball;T. J. Brooks;P. J. Pinter

  • Effects of free‐air CO2 enrichment on the development of the photosynthetic apparatus in wheat, as indicated by changes in leaf proteins

    G. Y. Nie;S. P. Long;S. P. Long;R. L. Garcia;B. A. Kimball

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce A. Kimball
Bruce A. Kimball Agricultural Research Service
R. L. LaMorte
R. L. LaMorte Agricultural Research Service
Gerard W. Wall
Gerard W. Wall Agricultural Research Service
Steven W. Leavitt
Steven W. Leavitt University of Arizona
Ray D. Jackson
Ray D. Jackson Agricultural Research Service
Michael J. Ottman
Michael J. Ottman University of Arizona
Thomas L. Thompson
Thomas L. Thompson Virginia Tech
Glenn J. Fitzgerald
Glenn J. Fitzgerald University of Melbourne
Sherwood B. Idso
Sherwood B. Idso Agricultural Research Service
R.J. Reginato
R.J. Reginato National Aeronautics and Space Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Paul J. Pinter

Recently Published Articles