World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
46010
World Ranking
8177
National Ranking
317

Paul E. de Jong publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul E. de Jong sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 333 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul E. de Jong D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul E. de Jong sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul E. de Jong is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a focus on specialized subfields including Nephrology and Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism.

The main research topics that characterize their work encompass Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes, Diabetes Treatment and Management, as well as Dialysis and Renal Disease Management.

Among published works, Paul E. de Jong has contributed to the following recent paper:

  • A meta-analysis of GFR slope as a surrogate endpoint for kidney failure, 2023, Nature Medicine

Their frequent publication venue is Nature Medicine, indicating engagement with biomedical and clinical research communities.

Collaborations feature several co-authors, reflecting a network of research partnerships. Frequently appearing co-authors include:

  • William G. Herrington
  • Lesley A. Inker
  • Willem Collier
  • Tom Greene
  • Shiyuan Miao

Best Publications

  • Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis.

    Kunihiro Matsushita;Marije van der Velde;Brad C. Astor;Mark Woodward

  • The definition, classification, and prognosis of chronic kidney disease: a KDIGO Controversies Conference report

    Andrew S. Levey;Paul E. de Jong;Josef Coresh;Meguid E.l. Nahas

  • Urinary albumin excretion predicts cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality in general population

    Hans L. Hillege;Vaclav Fidler;Gilles F.H. Diercks;Wiek H. van Gilst

  • Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure

    Christopher Newton-Cheh;Christopher Newton-Cheh;Toby Johnson;Toby Johnson;Vesela Gateva;Martin D. Tobin

  • Progression of chronic kidney disease: The role of blood pressure control, proteinuria, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition - A patient-level meta-analysis

    Tazeen H. Jafar;Paul C. Stark;Christopher H. Schmid;Marcia Landa

  • Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and progression of nondiabetic renal disease. A meta-analysis of patient-level data

    T. H. Jafar;C. H. Schmid;M. Landa;I. Giatras

  • Factors influencing serum cystatin C levels other than renal function and the impact on renal function measurement

    Eric L. Knight;Jacobien C. Verhave;Donna Spiegelman;Hans L. Hillege

  • Associations of kidney disease measures with mortality and end-stage renal disease in individuals with and without diabetes: a meta-analysis

    Caroline S. Fox;Kunihiro Matsushita;Mark Woodward;Mark Woodward;Henk J.G. Bilo

  • Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher albuminuria are associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.: A collaborative meta-analysis of high-risk population cohorts

    Marije van der Velde;Kunihiro Matsushita;Josef Coresh;Brad C. Astor

  • Decline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Subsequent Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease and Mortality

    Josef Coresh;Tanvir Chowdhury Turin;Kunihiro Matsushita;Yingying Sang

  • Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher albuminuria are associated with mortality and end-stage renal disease. A collaborative meta-analysis of kidney disease population cohorts

    Brad C. Astor;Kunihiro Matsushita;Ron T. Gansevoort;Marije Van Der Velde

  • Microalbuminuria is common, also in a nondiabetic, nonhypertensive population, and an independent indicator of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular morbidity

    H. L. Hillege;W. M. T. Janssen;A. A. A. Bak;G. F. H. Diercks

  • Lower estimated GFR and higher albuminuria are associated with adverse kidney outcomes. A collaborative meta-analysis of general and high-risk population cohorts

    Ron T. Gansevoort;Kunihiro Matsushita;Marije van der Velde;Brad C. Astor

  • Effects of Fosinopril and Pravastatin on Cardiovascular Events in Subjects With Microalbuminuria

    Folkert W. Asselbergs;Gilles F.H. Diercks;Hans L. Hillege;Ad J. van Boven

  • Proteinuria as a modifiable risk factor for the progression of non-diabetic renal disease.

    Tazeen H Jafar;Paul C Stark;Christopher H Schmid;Marcia Landa

  • EFFICACY AND VARIABILITY OF THE ANTIPROTEINURIC EFFECT OF ACE INHIBITION BY LISINOPRIL

    Jan E. Heeg;Paul E. de Jong;Gjalt K. van der Hem;Dick de Zeeuw

  • Urinary albumin excretion is associated with renal functional abnormalities in a nondiabetic population.

    Sara-Joan Pinto-Sietsma;Wilbert M.T. Janssen;Hans L. Hillege;Gerjan Navis

  • A central body fat distribution is related to renal function impairment, even in lean subjects.

    Sara-Joan Pinto-Sietsma;Gerjan Navis;Wilbert M.T Janssen;Dick de Zeeuw

  • Is the antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibition mediated by interference in the renin-angiotensin system?

    Ron T. Gansevoort;Dick de Zeeuw;Paul E. de Jong

  • Smoking is related to albuminuria and abnormal renal function in nondiabetic persons

    SJ Pinto-Sietsma;J Mulder;Wmt Janssen;Hans Hillege

Frequent Co-Authors

Ron T. Gansevoort
Ron T. Gansevoort University Medical Center Groningen
Dick de Zeeuw
Dick de Zeeuw University of Groningen
Stephan J. L. Bakker
Stephan J. L. Bakker University Medical Center Groningen
Gerjan Navis
Gerjan Navis University Medical Center Groningen
Hans L. Hillege
Hans L. Hillege University Medical Center Groningen
Josef Coresh
Josef Coresh New York University
Wiek H. van Gilst
Wiek H. van Gilst University Medical Center Groningen
Mark Woodward
Mark Woodward Imperial College London
Kunihiro Matsushita
Kunihiro Matsushita Johns Hopkins University
Hiddo J.L. Heerspink
Hiddo J.L. Heerspink University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens the door to a variety of online degree options and professional pathways. For those interested in preventive health and wellness, earning a nutrition degree online is an excellent way to build expertise in dietetics and community health, supporting both clinical and non-clinical roles.

Aspiring healthcare leaders can consider accredited mha programs to advance their knowledge of healthcare administration and prepare for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, or public health organizations.

If you are already a registered nurse, there are flexible options like rn to bsn online no clinicals programs, which let you earn your BSN degree without the need for on-site clinical requirements.

For nurses aiming for the highest level of practice, dnp online programs offer a streamlined path to become a Doctor of Nursing Practice, often with flexible schedules designed for working professionals.

These online pathways can help you advance your healthcare career with the flexibility to study from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Paul E. de Jong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles