What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Cancer
- Disease
His primary areas of investigation include Internal medicine, Demography, Cancer, Incidence and Risk factor.
His research in Internal medicine intersects with topics in Immunology, Surgery and Oncology.
The concepts of his Demography study are interwoven with issues in Odds ratio, Body mass index, Gerontology, Public health and Socioeconomic status.
Jan Sundquist has included themes like Psoriasis and Family history in his Cancer study.
His work deals with themes such as Epidemiology, Confidence interval, Stroke, Dermatomyositis and Type 2 diabetes, which intersect with Incidence.
His studies deal with areas such as Diabetes mellitus, Injury prevention, Gastroenterology and Pediatrics as well as Risk factor.
His most cited work include:
- Comorbidities and mortality in persons with schizophrenia: a Swedish national cohort study. (354 citations)
- Comorbidities and Mortality in Bipolar Disorder A Swedish National Cohort Study (333 citations)
- Comorbidities and Mortality in Bipolar Disorder A Swedish National Cohort Study (333 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Jan Sundquist focuses on Internal medicine, Demography, Cancer, Incidence and Hazard ratio.
His Internal medicine study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Immunology and Oncology.
His work carried out in the field of Demography brings together such families of science as Odds ratio, Gerontology, Marital status, Confidence interval and Socioeconomic status.
His Cancer research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Relative risk, Surgery and Pathology.
His studies in Incidence integrate themes in fields like Sibling, Epidemiology, Etiology, Disease and Pediatrics.
His Hazard ratio study also includes
- Atrial fibrillation most often made with reference to Proportional hazards model,
- Cohort study together with Cohort.
He most often published in these fields:
- Internal medicine (71.29%)
- Demography (51.52%)
- Cancer (49.02%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?
- Hazard ratio (39.77%)
- Internal medicine (71.29%)
- Proportional hazards model (31.74%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Hazard ratio, Internal medicine, Proportional hazards model, Demography and Cancer are his primary areas of study.
His Hazard ratio research integrates issues from Relative risk, Lower risk, Marital status and Population study.
His research on Internal medicine often connects related areas such as Oncology.
His research integrates issues of Cohort study, Substance abuse, Public health, Socioeconomic status and Alcohol use disorder in his study of Demography.
The concepts of his Cancer study are interwoven with issues in Survival rate, Prospective cohort study, Epidemiology and Obstetrics.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Etiology, Pediatrics and Medical genetics in addition to Incidence.
Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Risk of hypertension into adulthood in persons born prematurely: a national cohort study. (12 citations)
- Preterm birth and risk of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a national cohort study (11 citations)
- Preterm birth and risk of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a national cohort study (11 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Cancer
- Disease
Jan Sundquist mostly deals with Demography, Internal medicine, Proportional hazards model, Hazard ratio and Cancer.
His research in Demography intersects with topics in Register based, Substance abuse, Female sex and Drug register.
Much of his study explores Internal medicine relationship to Oncology.
His research integrates issues of Socioeconomic status and Risk factor in his study of Hazard ratio.
His Cancer study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Relative risk and Family history.
He combines subjects such as Marital status and Pediatrics with his study of Confidence interval.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
