World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
51
Citations
22517
World Ranking
211
National Ranking
128

Christopher M. Weible publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher M. Weible sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 196 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Christopher M. Weible D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher M. Weible sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christopher M. Weible is affiliated with the University of Colorado Denver in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad domain of Social Sciences, with a specific concentration in subfields such as Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change, Public Administration, and Strategy and Management.

The topics covered in Weible's work include Policy Transfer and Learning, Public Policy and Administration Research, Political Influence and Corporate Strategies, Electoral Systems and Political Participation, Sustainability and Climate Change Governance, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, and Risk Perception and Management.

Notable recent papers authored by Weible include:

  • COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives (2020, Policy Sciences)

Other influential papers, although led by different authors but often cited alongside Weible's work, include:

  • Advancing understanding of natural resource governance: a post-Ostrom research agenda (2020, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability)
  • Updating the Institutional Collective Action Framework (2020, Policy Studies Journal)
  • Tempest in a teapot? Toward new collaborations between mainstream policy process studies and interpretive policy studies (2020, Policy Sciences)
  • Building blocks of polycentric governance (2023, Policy Studies Journal)

Weible frequently collaborates with several scholars across their research efforts. These frequent coauthors include Tanya Heikkila, Claire A. Dunlop, Oscar Berglund, Paul Cairney, and Karin Ingold.

Their work often appears in established academic venues, with the most frequent publication outlets being Policy Sciences, Policy Studies Journal, Review of Policy Research, International Review of Public Policy, and European Policy Analysis.

Best Publications

  • The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications

    Paul A. Sabatier;Christopher M. Weible

  • The advocacy coalition framework

    Christopher M. Weible;Daniel Nohrstedt

  • Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework

    Christopher M. Weible;Paul A. Sabatier;Kelly McQueen

  • COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives.

    Christopher M. Weible;Daniel Nohrstedt;Paul Cairney;David P. Carter

  • A Quarter Century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Introduction to the Special Issue

    Christopher M. Weible;Paul A. Sabatier;Hank C. Jenkins-Smith;Daniel Nohrstedt

  • An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding the Political Context of California Marine Protected Area Policy

    Christopher M. Weible

  • Expert‐Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis

    Christopher M. Weible

  • Comparing Policy Networks: Marine Protected Areas in California

    Christopher M. Weible;Paul A. Sabatier

  • Understanding and influencing the policy process

    Christopher M. Weible;Tanya Heikkila;Peter deLeon;Paul A. Sabatier

  • The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Overview of the Research Program

    Hank C. Jenkins-Smith;Daniel Nohrstedt;Christopher M. Weible;Karin Ingold

  • A Guide to the Advocacy Coalition Framework

    Christopher M. Weible;Paul A. Sabatier

  • Beliefs and Perceived Influence in a Natural Resource Conflict: An Advocacy Coalition Approach to Policy Networks:

    Christopher M. Weible

  • The Logic of Policy Change after Crisis : Proximity and Subsystem Interaction

    Daniel Nohrstedt;Christopher M. Weible

  • Coalitions, Science, and Belief Change: Comparing Adversarial and Collaborative Policy Subsystems

    Christopher M. Weible;Paul A. Sabatier

  • Fostering Learning through Collaboration: Knowledge Acquisition and Belief Change in Marine Aquaculture Partnerships

    William D. Leach;Christopher M. Weible;Scott R. Vince;Saba N. Siddiki

  • A systematic approach to institutional analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom's grammar

    Xavier Basurto;Gordon Kingsley;Kelly McQueen;Mshadoni Smith

  • Policy learning and policy change: theorizing their relations from different perspectives

    Stéphane Moyson;Peter Scholten;Christopher M. Weible

  • A Comparison of a Collaborative and Top‐Down Approach to the Use of Science in Policy: Establishing Marine Protected Areas in California

    Christopher Weible;Paul A. Sabatier;Mark Lubell

  • Understanding a Period of Policy Change: The Case of Hydraulic Fracturing Disclosure Policy in Colorado

    Tanya Heikkila;Jonathan J. Pierce;Samuel Gallaher;Jennifer Kagan

  • Explaining Coordination in Collaborative Partnerships and Clarifying the Scope of the Belief Homophily Hypothesis

    John C. Calanni;Saba N. Siddiki;Christopher M. Weible;William D. Leach

Frequent Co-Authors

Tanya Heikkila
Tanya Heikkila University of Colorado Denver
Paul A. Sabatier
Paul A. Sabatier University of California, Davis
Karin Ingold
Karin Ingold University of Bern
Hank C. Jenkins-Smith
Hank C. Jenkins-Smith University of Oklahoma
Daniel Nohrstedt
Daniel Nohrstedt Uppsala University
Peter DeLeon
Peter DeLeon University of Colorado Denver
Xavier Basurto
Xavier Basurto Duke University
Paul Cairney
Paul Cairney University of Stirling
Edella Schlager
Edella Schlager University of Arizona
Manuel Fischer
Manuel Fischer Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science in the USA opens doors to a range of academic and professional opportunities. Many students choose to complement their studies by pursuing history majors, which offer a deeper understanding of the political context and critical analysis skills valued in various sectors.

For students seeking flexibility and diverse skill sets, enrolling in an online interdisciplinary studies degree can be an excellent option. These programs blend political science with other academic fields, broadening career options from public policy to communications.

Advancing your education with a master’s degree can lead to higher earning potential and leadership roles. Consider the cheapest online masters in history for cost-effective pathways that build advanced research and analytical abilities sought after in government, education, and business.

Additionally, obtaining relevant easy licenses and certifications to get online can quickly boost your job prospects. These certifications often focus on tangible skills, making you more competitive for specialized roles in administration, data analysis, or project management.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher M. Weible

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles