World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 27 1425 1299 714 629 97 5609

Mark K. McBeth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark K. McBeth between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark K. McBeth published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2020. 8 of the 137 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2020. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 1 publication
1992 2026

137 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark K. McBeth: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 4
1996 4
1997 3
1998 6
1999 2
2000 3
2001 2
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 1
2007 2
2008 2
2009 2
2010 7
2011 5
2012 3
2013 4
2014 12
2015 5
2016 8
2017 5
2018 5
2019 3
2020 13
2021 4
2022 5
2023 5
2024 2
2025 7
2026 1
Total 137
Download as CSV

Mark K. McBeth publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark K. McBeth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 96–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 97 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85 97
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Mark K. McBeth D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark K. McBeth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 27 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 27 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75 27
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark K. McBeth is affiliated with Idaho State University in the United States and specializes in the field of Social Sciences, particularly within subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Education, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory, and Communication.

Their research encompasses several key topics including:

  • Risk Perception and Management
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
  • Policy Transfer and Learning

Recent publications by Mark K. McBeth include:

  • "NARRATIVE EMPATHY" (2022), published in World Affairs
  • "Political ideology and nuclear energy: Perception, proximity, and trust" (2022), published in Review of Policy Research
  • "Coddled or Engaged? Teaching Political Tolerance to Generation Z Students" (2022), published in Journal of Political Science Education

Other notable works relevant to their academic network include:

  • "Narrative in the Time of Trump: Is the Narrative Policy Framework good enough to be relevant?" (2020), published in Administrative Theory & Praxis
  • "A Zero-Carbon Nuclear Energy Future? Lessons Learned from Perceptions of Climate Change and Nuclear Waste" (2023), published in Energies

Mark K. McBeth's frequent co-authors are:

  • Michael D. Jones
  • Irene van Woerden
  • Carina A Dehner
  • Rae Moss
  • Donna L. Lybecker

They have published in a range of venues multiple times, among which the most frequent are:

  • Review of Policy Research (2 publications)
  • Administrative Theory & Praxis (1 publication)
  • Energies (1 publication)
  • World Affairs (1 publication)
  • Journal of Political Science Education (1 publication)

In addition to articles, Mark K. McBeth has authored a book titled Literacy and Learning in Times of Crisis (2022), published by Peter Lang, which has been cited in academic circles.

Best Publications

  • A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?

    Michael D. Jones;Mark K. McBeth

  • Policy Narratives and Policy Processes

    Elizabeth A. Shanahan;Michael D. Jones;Mark K. McBeth

  • The Intersection of Narrative Policy Analysis and Policy Change Theory

    Mark K. McBeth;Elizabeth A. Shanahan;Ruth J. Arnell;Paul L. Hathaway

  • An Angel on the Wind: How Heroic Policy Narratives Shape Policy Realities

    Elizabeth A. Shanahan;Michael D. Jones;Mark K. McBeth;Ross R. Lane

  • The Narrative Policy Framework

    Elizabeth A. Shanahan;Michael D. Jones;Mark K. Mcbeth;Claudio M. Radaelli

  • The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis

    Michael D. Jones;Elizabeth A Shanahan;Mark K McBeth

  • Narrative Policy Framework: The Influence of Media Policy Narratives on Public Opinion

    Elizabeth A. Shanahan;Mark K. Mcbeth;Paul L. Hathaway

  • How to conduct a Narrative Policy Framework study

    Elizabeth A. Shanahan;Michael D. Jones;Mark K. McBeth

  • Conduit or contributor? The role of media in policy change theory

    Elizabeth A. Shanahan;Mark K. McBeth;Paul L. Hathaway;Ruth J. Arnell

  • The Science of Storytelling: Measuring Policy Beliefs in Greater Yellowstone

    Mark K. McBeth;Elizabeth A. Shanahan;Michael D. Jones

  • Introducing the Narrative Policy Framework

    Michael D. Jones;Mark K. McBeth;Elizabeth A. Shanahan

  • Public opinion for sale: The role of policy marketers in Greater Yellowstone policy conflict

    Mark K. Mcbeth;Elizabeth A. Shanahan

  • The Narrative Policy Framework

    Unknown

  • The Science of Stories

    Michael D. Jones;Elizabeth A. Shanahan;Mark K. McBeth

  • Buffalo Tales: Interest Group Policy Stories in Greater Yellowstone

    Mark K. McBeth;Elizabeth A. Shanahan;Paul L. Hathaway;Linda E. Tigert

  • The Story of Good Citizenship: Framing Public Policy in the Context of Duty-Based versus Engaged Citizenship

    Mark K. Mcbeth;Donna L. Lybecker;Kacee A. Garner

  • Rural environmental attitudes

    Mark K. McBeth;Richard H. Foster

  • Trash or treasure: recycling narratives and reducing political polarisation

    Donna L. Lybecker;Mark K. McBeth;Elizabeth Kusko

  • Community Encouragement: Returning to the Basis for Community Development.

    Robert E. Chambers;Mark K. McBeth

  • Policy Story or Gory Story? Narrative Policy Framework Analysis of Buffalo Field Campaign's YouTube Videos

    Mark K. McBeth;Elizabeth A. Shanahan;Molly C. Arrandale Anderson;Barbara Rose

  • The Narrative Policy Framework, Agendas, and Sanctuary Cities: The Construction of a Public Problem

    Mark K. McBeth;Donna L. Lybecker

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth A. Shanahan
Elizabeth A. Shanahan Montana State University
Michael D. Jones
Michael D. Jones University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Claudio M. Radaelli
Claudio M. Radaelli European University Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens doors to numerous interdisciplinary pathways. Many students find that pairing their degree with related fields provides more diverse career opportunities. For example, careers in environmental policy can stem from understanding environmental science degree jobs salary, allowing graduates to address complex global challenges.

Analytical skills are vital in Political Science, prompting some students to pursue a bachelor of mathematics online. This can lead to roles in data analysis, policy modeling, or research, where math and political insight intersect.

Those interested in information management often consider the top library science programs. Library science professionals play a key role in preserving, curating, and providing access to research essential in the public sector.

Political Science also aligns closely with history majors in college. Understanding historical contexts enhances political analysis and policy development, paving the way for roles in education, government, or international relations.

Best Scientists Citing Mark K. McBeth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles