World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 44 16889 15255 927 827 169 6820

Mark Wilson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Wilson between 1964 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Wilson published across 63 years, from 1964 to 2026, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 1999. 5 of the 241 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 1999. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
1964 2026

241 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Wilson: publications per year, 1964 to 2026
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 1
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 2
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 2
1989 6
1990 2
1991 0
1992 0
1993 4
1994 4
1995 4
1996 8
1997 7
1998 6
1999 17
2000 10
2001 7
2002 12
2003 12
2004 11
2005 5
2006 7
2007 7
2008 5
2009 7
2010 8
2011 7
2012 5
2013 5
2014 4
2015 3
2016 5
2017 4
2018 4
2019 8
2020 12
2021 9
2022 6
2023 2
2024 5
2025 4
2026 1
Total 241
Download as CSV

Mark Wilson publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wilson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 169 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350 169
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Wilson D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wilson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808 44
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Wilson is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the fields of Materials Science and Physics and Astronomy. Their research primarily spans Materials Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics, and Atomic and Molecular Physics, alongside applications in Biomedical Engineering and Molecular Biology.

Their body of work covers a range of topics, notably in Theoretical and Computational Physics, Material Dynamics and Properties, Graphene research and applications, as well as Machine Learning in Materials Science. Other areas of focus include Topological and Geometric Data Analysis, Glass properties and applications, and Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials.

Wilson's recent papers reflect a diversity of research interests and publication in various noted scientific venues. Noteworthy publications include:

  • Origins of structural and electronic transitions in disordered silicon, 2021, Nature
  • Exploring the configurational space of amorphous graphene with machine-learned atomic energies, 2022, Chemical Science
  • Persistent homology in two-dimensional atomic networks, 2021, The Journal of Chemical Physics
  • The glass transition and the non-Arrhenian viscosity of carbonate melts, 2021, American Mineralogist
  • Generalized network theory of physical two-dimensional systems, 2020, Physical review. E

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • David Ormrod Morley
  • Volker L. Deringer
  • Noam Bernstein
  • Gábor Cśanyi
  • Chiheb Ben Mahmoud

Mark Wilson has published regularly in several academic journals. Their most common publication venues include:

  • The Journal of Chemical Physics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
  • Physical review. E
  • RSC Advances

Their interdisciplinary research engages with complex physical systems and computational approaches to materials science. Contributions to machine learning applications in material modeling and investigations into structural transitions at the atomic level are evident throughout their work.

Best Publications

  • ‘Covalent’ effects in ‘ionic’ systems

    Paul A. Madden;Mark Wilson

  • Origins of structural and electronic transitions in disordered silicon

    Volker L. Deringer;Noam Bernstein;Gábor Csányi;Chiheb Ben Mahmoud

  • A density-driven phase transition between semiconducting and metallic polyamorphs of silicon

    Paul F. McMillan;Mark Wilson;Dominik Daisenberger;Denis Machon

  • Polarization Effects, Network Dynamics, and the Infrared Spectrum of Amorphous SiO2.

    Mark Wilson;Paul A. Madden;Mahin Hemmati;C. Austen Angell

  • Polyamorphism and liquid-liquid phase transitions: challenges for experiment and theory

    Paul F. McMillan;Paul F. McMillan;Mark Wilson;Martin Charles Wilding;Dominik Daisenberger

  • Voids, Layers, and the First Sharp Diffraction Peak in ZnCl 2

    Mark Wilson;Paul A. Madden

  • Pressure-induced amorphization and polyamorphism: Inorganic and biochemical systems

    D. Machon;F. Meersman;F. Meersman;Martin Wilding;M. Wilson

  • High-Pressure Transformation of SiO2 Glass from a Tetrahedral to an Octahedral Network: A Joint Approach Using Neutron Diffraction and Molecular Dynamics

    Anita Zeidler;Kamil Wezka;Ruth F Rowlands;Dean A J Whittaker

  • Structural studies and polymorphism in amorphous solids and liquids at high pressure

    Martin C. Wilding;Mark Wilson;Paul F. McMillan;Paul F. McMillan

  • ``Prepeaks'' and ``first sharp diffraction peaks'' in computer simulations of strong and fragile ionic liquids

    Wilson M;Madden Pa

  • Computer Simulations of Mesogenic Molecules Using Realistic Atom-Atom Potentials

    Mark R. Wilson;Michael P. Allen

  • Hydrolysis of the amorphous silica surface. II. Calculation of activation barriers and mechanisms

    Tiffany R. Walsh;Mark Wilson;Adrian P. Sutton

  • Computer simulation study of liquid crystal formation in a semi-flexible system of linked hard spheres

    M.R. Wilson;M.P. Allen

  • The Uncatalyzed Direct Amide Formation Reaction – Mechanism Studies and the Key Role of Carboxylic Acid H‐Bonding

    Hayley Charville;David A. Jackson;George Hodges;Andrew Whiting

  • Evaluation of the many-body contributions to the interionic interactions in MgO

    Adrian J. Rowley;Patrick J̈emmer;Mark Wilson;Paul A. Madden

  • Molecular dynamics simulations of compressible ions

    M. Wilson;P. A. Madden;N. C. Pyper;J. H. Harding

  • Structure of molten MCl3 systems from a polarizable ion simulation model

    Francis Hutchinson;Adrian J. Rowley;Malcolm K. Walters;Mark Wilson

  • Structure of trans-4-(trans-4-n-pentylcyclohexyl)cyclohexylcarbonitrile (CCH5) in the isotropic and nematic phases: a computer simulation study

    M. R. Wilson;M. P. Allen

  • Growth of ionic crystals in carbon nanotubes.

    Mark Wilson;Paul A. Madden

  • A unified description of MCI3 systems with a polarizable ion simulation model

    Francis Hutchinson;Mark Wilson;Paul A. Madden

  • High-pressure x-ray scattering and computer simulation studies of density-induced polyamorphism in silicon

    Dominik Daisenberger;Mark Wilson;Paul F. McMillan;Paul F. McMillan;Raul Quesada Cabrera

  • On the Ewald summation of Gaussian charges for the simulation of metallic surfaces

    Todd R. Gingrich;Mark Wilson

  • Induced and spontaneous deracemization in bent-core liquid crystal phases and in other phases doped with bent-core molecules.

    David J. Earl;Mikhail A. Osipov;Hideo Takezoe;Yoichi Takanishi

  • `Covalent' effects in `ionic' liquids

    Paul A Madden;Mark Wilson

  • Short- and intermediate-range order in MCl2 melts: the importance of anionic polarization

    Unknown

  • Stability of Small MgO Nanotube Clusters: Predictions of a Transferable Ionic Potential Model

    Mark Wilson

  • Dipole and quadrupole polarization in ionic systems: Ab initio studies

    Patrick J̈emmer;Mark Wilson;Paul A. Madden;Patrick W. Fowler

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul A. Madden
Paul A. Madden University of Oxford
Paul A. Madden
Paul A. Madden University of Edinburgh
Paul F. McMillan
Paul F. McMillan University College London
John B. Parise
John B. Parise Stony Brook University
Patrick W. Fowler
Patrick W. Fowler University of Sheffield
Chris J. Benmore
Chris J. Benmore Argonne National Laboratory
Richard A Brooker
Richard A Brooker University of Bristol
David A. Drabold
David A. Drabold Ohio University
Jamie H. Warner
Jamie H. Warner The University of Texas at Austin
George M. Whitesides
George M. Whitesides Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, many of which can be enhanced through specialized online education. For those interested in intersecting fields, pursuing criminal justice associate programs online can provide a unique perspective on forensic chemistry and law enforcement applications.

Additionally, chemistry graduates might consider expanding their qualifications with degrees for paralegals, combining scientific expertise with legal knowledge to support intellectual property cases or regulatory compliance. Detailed insight into these options is available at degrees for paralegals.

For those aiming to leverage their chemistry background in the healthcare sector, pathways such as pharmaceutical sales offer promising salaries and career growth. Learning how to get into pharmaceutical sales is a practical step for chemistry professionals seeking a business-oriented role in the industry.

Lastly, becoming a pharmacist remains a classic and rewarding option for chemistry majors. Understanding how to become a pharmacist can guide students through necessary education and licensing requirements, connecting their academic experience with essential healthcare services.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Wilson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles