World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jens Schneider-Mergener

Jens Schneider-Mergener

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
67
Citations
14726
World Ranking
8280
National Ranking
606

Jens Schneider-Mergener publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Schneider-Mergener sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 164 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jens Schneider-Mergener D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Schneider-Mergener sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jens Schneider-Mergener is a researcher affiliated with Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in Germany. Their academic profile reflects a focus within the university's research environment, contributing to the broader scientific community through their work.

While specific details about research topics, main fields of study, subfields, and primary areas of expertise are not explicitly listed, Jens Schneider-Mergener's scholarly activity is centered within their institutional framework. Information on recent publications, frequent co-authors, and common publication venues are not available, limiting detailed insight into their research collaborations and dissemination channels.

No records of book publications or awards have been indicated for Jens Schneider-Mergener, which suggests that their academic output may primarily comprise other types of scholarly contributions or is not publicly documented in these categories.

Given the lack of detailed data on papers, co-authors, and specialized themes, it is noted that Jens Schneider-Mergener maintains an active role in research via Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, which is known for its multidisciplinary scientific endeavors.

Best Publications

  • Substrate specificity of the DnaK chaperone determined by screening cellulose‐bound peptide libraries

    Stefan Rüdiger;Lothar Germeroth;Jens Schneider‐Mergener;Bernd Bukau

  • Changing the antigen binding specificity by single point mutations of an anti-p24 (HIV-1) antibody.

    Karsten Winkler;Achim Kramer;Gabriele Küttner;Martina Seifert

  • FAN, a Novel WD-Repeat Protein, Couples the p55 TNF-Receptor to Neutral Sphingomyelinase

    Sabine Adam-Klages;Dieter Adam;Katja Wiegmann;Sandra Struve

  • Differential Activation of Acute Phase Response Factor/STAT3 and STAT1 via the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Interleukin 6 Signal Transducer gp130 I. DEFINITION OF A NOVEL PHOSPHOTYROSINE MOTIF MEDIATING STAT1 ACTIVATION

    Claudia Gerhartz;Birgit Heesel;Jürgen Sasse;Ulrike Hemmann

  • Target Structures of the CD8+-T-Cell Response to Human Cytomegalovirus: the 72-Kilodalton Major Immediate-Early Protein Revisited

    Florian Kern;Ingolf Pascal Surel;Nicole Faulhaber;Claudia Frömmel

  • Its substrate specificity characterizes the DnaJ co‐chaperone as a scanning factor for the DnaK chaperone

    Stefan Rüdiger;Jens Schneider‐Mergener;Bernd Bukau

  • Applications of peptide arrays prepared by the SPOT-technology.

    Ulrich Reineke;Rudolf Volkmer-Engert;Jens Schneider-Mergener;Jens Schneider-Mergener

  • T-CELL EPITOPE MAPPING BY FLOW CYTOMETRY

    Florian Kern;Ingolf Pascal Surel;Carsten Brock;Bernd Freistedt

  • Specific interactions between the syntrophin PDZ domain and voltage-gated sodium channels.

    Johan Schultz;Ulrich Hoffmuüller;Gerd Krause;Jennifer Ashurst

  • SHP2 and SOCS3 Contribute to Tyr-759-dependent Attenuation of Interleukin-6 Signaling through gp130

    Ute Lehmann;Jochen Schmitz;Manuela Weissenbach;Radoslaw M. Sobota

  • Recognition of proline-rich motifs by protein-protein-interaction domains.

    Linda J. Ball;Ronald Kühne;Jens Schneider-Mergener;Hartmut Oschkinat

  • Coherent membrane supports for parallel microsynthesis and screening of bioactive peptides.

    Holger Wenschuh;Rudolf Volkmer-Engert;Margit Schmidt;Marco Schulz

  • Molecular Basis for the Binding Promiscuity of an Anti-p24 (HIV-1) Monoclonal Antibody

    Achim Kramer;Thomas Keitel;Karsten Winkler;Walter Stöcklein

  • Protein interaction networks by proteome peptide scanning

    Christiane Landgraf;Simona Panni;Luisa Montecchi-Palazzi;Luisa Castagnoli

  • ClpS is an essential component of the N-end rule pathway in Escherichia coli

    A. Erbse;R. Schmidt;T. Bornemann;T. Bornemann;J. Schneider-Mergener

  • Distribution of binding sequences for the mitochondrial import receptors Tom20, Tom22, and Tom70 in a presequence-carrying preprotein and a non-cleavable preprotein.

    Jan Brix;Stefan Rüdiger;Bernd Bukau;Jens Schneider-Mergener

  • Substrate recognition by the AAA+ chaperone ClpB.

    Christian Schlieker;Jimena Weibezahn;Holger Patzelt;Peter Tessarz

  • Synthesis and screening of peptide libraries on continuous cellulose membrane supports.

    Achim Kramer;Jens Schneider-Mergener

  • Binding specificity of Escherichia coli trigger factor.

    Holger Patzelt;Stefan Rüdiger;Dirk Brehmer;Günter Kramer

  • Dissociation of the signalling and antiviral properties of SDF-1-derived small peptides

    Nikolaus Heveker;Mônica Montes;Lothar Germeroth;Ali Amara

Frequent Co-Authors

Achim Kramer
Achim Kramer Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Hartmut Oschkinat
Hartmut Oschkinat Freie Universität Berlin
Bernd Bukau
Bernd Bukau Heidelberg University
Hans-Dieter Volk
Hans-Dieter Volk Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Robert Sabat
Robert Sabat Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Mike Schutkowski
Mike Schutkowski Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Stefan G.D. Rüdiger
Stefan G.D. Rüdiger Utrecht University
Peter C. Heinrich
Peter C. Heinrich University of Freiburg
Fred Schaper
Fred Schaper Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Gerd Krause
Gerd Krause Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Biology and Biochemistry have a growing number of online pathways to expand their careers in healthcare, science, and management. For those wishing to move into leadership roles within hospitals or clinics, online mha programs cahme accredited offer flexible options to gain crucial management skills while continuing to work.

Advanced nursing professionals can pursue a doctorate without traditional residency requirements through msn to dnp online no clinicals programs, ideal for teaching, research, or policy roles. If you’re interested in strategic leadership at the highest level, the best online dha programs focus on preparing experts in healthcare administration and policy.

Additionally, for those passionate about the intersection of pharmacy and biochemistry, online pharm d programs empower students to become advanced practitioners and researchers in pharmaceutical sciences. These diverse online degrees open doors in clinical, administrative, and research-based settings, offering flexibility and specialization for ambitious biology and biochemistry graduates.

Best Scientists Citing Jens Schneider-Mergener

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles