World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 65 7547 6841 436 394 142 19920

Matthew J. Gaunt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew J. Gaunt between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew J. Gaunt published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2015. 15 of the 157 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2015. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 12 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 3 publications
1998 2025

157 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew J. Gaunt: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 2
2003 7
2004 2
2005 4
2006 7
2007 2
2008 7
2009 3
2010 1
2011 12
2012 2
2013 6
2014 6
2015 15
2016 11
2017 9
2018 4
2019 8
2020 8
2021 8
2022 8
2023 5
2024 12
2025 3
Total 157
Download as CSV

Matthew J. Gaunt publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Gaunt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 142 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 142
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew J. Gaunt D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Gaunt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731 65
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Corday–Morgan Prize, Royal Society of Chemistry (UK)

Overview

Matthew J. Gaunt is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Chemistry and Materials Science. Within these fields, they have concentrated on subfields including Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, and Pharmaceutical Science.

Their main research topics encompass Catalytic C-H Functionalization Methods, Crystallization and Solubility Studies, X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography, Radical Photochemical Reactions, Chemical Synthesis and Analysis, Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis, and Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques.

Matthew J. Gaunt has contributed extensively to scientific literature, including publications in several notable venues. Frequent publication venues include The Cambridge Structural Database, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Science, Nature, and Chemical Reviews.

Significant recent papers by Matthew J. Gaunt include:

  • New Strategies for the Transition-Metal Catalyzed Synthesis of Aliphatic Amines, 2020, Chemical Reviews
  • Visible-Light-Mediated Modification and Manipulation of Biomacromolecules, 2021, Chemical Reviews
  • A general carbonyl alkylative amination for tertiary amine synthesis, 2020, Nature
  • Visible-Light-Mediated Carbonyl Alkylative Amination to All-Alkyl α-Tertiary Amino Acid Derivatives, 2021, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • Multicomponent alkene azidoarylation by anion-mediated dual catalysis, 2021, Nature

Throughout their career, they have collaborated frequently with researchers such as Roopender Kumar, Milo A. Smith, Georgia R. Harris, Aaron Trowbridge, and Ala Bunescu.

Matthew J. Gaunt received the Corday-Morgan Prize from the Royal Society of Chemistry (UK) in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Recent developments in natural product synthesis using metal-catalysed C–H bond functionalisation

    Lindsay McMurray;Fionn O'Hara;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • A Meta-Selective Copper-Catalyzed C–H Bond Arylation

    Robert J. Phipps;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • Cu(II)-Catalyzed Direct and Site-Selective Arylation of Indoles Under Mild Conditions

    Robert J. Phipps;Neil P. Grimster;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • Palladium-catalyzed intermolecular alkenylation of indoles by solvent-controlled regioselective C-H functionalization.

    Neil P. Grimster;Carolyn Gauntlett;Christopher R. A. Godfrey;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • New Strategies for the Transition-Metal Catalyzed Synthesis of Aliphatic Amines.

    Aaron Trowbridge;Scarlett M. Walton;Scarlett M. Walton;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • Palladium-catalysed C–H activation of aliphatic amines to give strained nitrogen heterocycles

    Andrew McNally;Benjamin Haffemayer;Beatrice S. L. Collins;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • Oxidative Pd(II)-catalyzed C-H bond amination to carbazole at ambient temperature.

    James A. Jordan-Hore;Carin C. C. Johansson;Moises Gulias;Elizabeth M. Beck

  • Mild aerobic oxidative palladium (II) catalyzed C-H bond functionalization: regioselective and switchable C-H alkenylation and annulation of pyrroles.

    Elizabeth M. Beck;Neil P. Grimster;Richard Hatley;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • Recent Developments in the Use of Catalytic Asymmetric Ammonium Enolates in Chemical Synthesis

    Matthew J. Gaunt;Carin C. C. Johansson

  • A Highly Para‐Selective Copper(II)‐Catalyzed Direct Arylation of Aniline and Phenol Derivatives

    Claire-Lise Ciana;Robert J. Phipps;Jochen R. Brandt;Falco-Magnus Meyer

  • An Enantioselective Organocatalytic Oxidative Dearomatization Strategy

    Ngoc T Vo;Robert D M Pace;Fionn O'Hara;Matthew J Gaunt

  • Enantioselective organocatalytic cyclopropanation via ammonium ylides.

    Charles D. Papageorgiou;Maria A. Cubillo de Dios;Steven V. Ley;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • Copper(II)‐Catalyzed meta‐Selective Direct Arylation of α‐Aryl Carbonyl Compounds

    Hung A. Duong;Ruth E. Gilligan;Michael L. Cooke;Robert J. Phipps

  • Synthesis of rhazinicine by a metal-catalyzed C-H bond functionalization strategy.

    Elizabeth M. Beck;Richard Hatley;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • Pd-Catalyzed C–H Bond Functionalization on the Indole and Pyrrole Nucleus

    Elizabeth M. Beck;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • Multicomponent synthesis of tertiary alkylamines by photocatalytic olefin-hydroaminoalkylation

    Aaron Trowbridge;Dominik Reich;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • A general catalytic β-C-H carbonylation of aliphatic amines to β-lactams

    Darren Willcox;Ben G. N. Chappell;Kirsten F. Hogg;Jonas Calleja

  • Enantioselective α-arylation of N-acyloxazolidinones with copper(II)-bisoxazoline catalysts and diaryliodonium salts.

    Aurélien Bigot;Alice E. Williamson;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • Rational Design of Benzyl-Type Protecting Groups Allows Sequential Deprotection of Hydroxyl Groups by Catalytic Hydrogenolysis

    Matthew J. Gaunt;Jinquan Yu;Jonathan B. Spencer

  • A protein functionalization platform based on selective reactions at methionine residues

    Michael T. Taylor;Jennifer E. Nelson;Marcos G. Suero;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • Copper-Catalyzed Electrophilic Carbofunctionalization of Alkynes to Highly Functionalized Tetrasubstituted Alkenes

    Marcos G. Suero;Elliott D. Bayle;Beatrice S. L. Collins;Matthew J. Gaunt

  • Enantioselective catalytic intramolecular cyclopropanation using modified cinchona alkaloid organocatalysts.

    Carin C. C. Johansson;Nadine Bremeyer;Steven V. Ley;Dafydd R. Owen

  • Enantioselective organocatalysis.

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Chemistry in the USA, exploring related fields can open diverse career opportunities. One intriguing area is forensic science, where a strong chemistry background is valuable. Understanding the forensic scientist salary helps gauge the financial prospects of entering this specialized sector.

Online learning has made it easier for many to start or switch careers. For those interested in law enforcement or legal systems, earning an online degree in criminal justice can be a practical option. The article on criminal justice degree tuition provides insights on costs, making educational planning more straightforward.

Even at the associate degree level, there are quality options available. The online criminal justice associate degree programs offer a foundation that can lead to roles in law enforcement and other fields requiring analytical skills.

Additionally, complementing a science background with a legal perspective can be advantageous. Those interested might consider a paralegal certificate, which can enhance career flexibility and earning potential across various legal and scientific domains.

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles