World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 36 9074 8703 342 332 102 6915

Neil R. Viney publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Neil R. Viney between 1987 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Neil R. Viney published across 35 years, from 1987 to 2021, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2008. 3 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2008. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications
1987 2021

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Neil R. Viney: publications per year, 1987 to 2021
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 2
1992 0
1993 0
1994 2
1995 1
1996 4
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 2
2001 4
2002 1
2003 5
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 3
2008 10
2009 9
2010 5
2011 10
2012 5
2013 6
2014 2
2015 8
2016 4
2017 0
2018 5
2019 0
2020 1
2021 2
Total 102
Download as CSV

Neil R. Viney publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil R. Viney sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 102 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492 102
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Neil R. Viney D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil R. Viney sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206 36
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Neil R. Viney is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science and Engineering, with particular attention to subfields including Water Science and Technology, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Mechanics of Materials, and Ocean Engineering.

Their work covers various topics related to hydrology and environmental assessment. These main research topics include:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • Coal Properties and Utilization
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Mine drainage and remediation techniques

Neil R. Viney has contributed to multiple publications, notably in the Journal of Hydrology, which has featured three of their papers. Their recent works include:

  • "Impacts of coal mining and coal seam gas extraction on groundwater and surface water" (2020), Journal of Hydrology
  • "Modelling the impacts of future coal mining and coal seam gas extraction on river flows: A methodological framework" (2021), Journal of Hydrology
  • "Modelling the cumulative impacts of future coal mining and coal seam gas extraction on river flows: Applications of methodology" (2021), Journal of Hydrology

The collaborations of Neil R. Viney involve frequent co-authors, such as:

  • David Post
  • Russell S. Crosbie
  • Luk Peeters
  • Yongqiang Zhang
  • Natasha Herron

Best Publications

  • The Millennium Drought in southeast Australia (2001–2009): Natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society

    Albert I. J. M. van Dijk;Hylke E. Beck;Russell S. Crosbie;Richard A. M. de Jeu

  • Climate non-stationarity – Validity of calibrated rainfall–runoff models for use in climate change studies

    J. Vaze;D.A. Post;F.H.S. Chiew;J.-M. Perraud

  • Estimating climate change impact on runoff across southeast Australia: Method, results, and implications of the modeling method

    F. H. S. Chiew;J. Teng;J. Vaze;D. A. Post

  • Performance of conceptual rainfall‐runoff models in low‐yielding ephemeral catchments

    W. Ye;B. C. Bates;N. R. Viney;M. Sivapalan

  • Reduced streamflow in water-stressed climates consistent with CO2 effects on vegetation

    Anna M. Ukkola;I. Colin Prentice;I. Colin Prentice;Trevor F. Keenan;Albert I. J. M. van Dijk

  • A Review of Fine Fuel Moisture Modelling

    Neil R. Viney

  • Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modeling (LUCHEM) I: Model intercomparison with current land use

    L Breuer;J.A. Huisman;P Willems;H Bormann

  • Climate change and runoff in south-western Australia

    R.P. Silberstein;S.K. Aryal;J. Durrant;M. Pearcey

  • Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modelling(LUCHEM) II: ensemble combinations and predictions

    Neil Viney;H Bormann;L Breuer;A Bronstert

  • Estimating fuel response time and predicting fuel moisture content from field data

    E. A. Catchpole;W. R. Catchpole;N.R.Viney;W. L. McCaw

  • Rainfall-Runoff Modelling Across Southeast Australia: Datasets, Models and Results

    J Vaze;F H S Chiew;J M Perraud;N Viney

  • Impacts of climate variability on stream-flow in the Yellow River

    Guobin Fu;Guobin Fu;Stephen P. Charles;Neil R. Viney;Shulin Chen

  • Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modeling (LUCHEM) III: scenario analysis

    J.A. Huisman;L Breuer;H Bormann;A Bronstert

  • Water and salt balance modelling to predict the effects of land‐use changes in forested catchments. 1. Small catchment water balance model

    Murugesu Sivapalan;John K. Ruprecht;Neil R. Viney

  • Modelling the energy balance of a natural jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest

    R. P. Silberstein;Murugesu Sivapalan;N. R. Viney;A. Held

  • A conceptual model of nutrient mobilisation and transport applicable at large catchment scales.

    N.R Viney;M Sivapalan;D Deeley

  • A conceptual model of sediment transport: Application to the Avon River Basin in Western Australia

    Neil R. Viney;Murugesu Sivapalan

  • Energy balance of a natural jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest in Western Australia: measurements during the spring and summer

    Richard Silberstein;Alexander Held;Tom Hatton;Neil Viney

  • It never rains on Sunday: the prevalence and implications of untagged multi-day rainfall accumulations in the Australian high quality data set

    Neil R. Viney;Bryson C. Bates

  • Tests of a space‐time model of daily rainfall in southwestern Australia based on nonhomogeneous random cascades

    Chatchai Jothityangkoon;Murugesu Sivapalan;Neil R. Viney;Neil R. Viney

Frequent Co-Authors

Murugesu Sivapalan
Murugesu Sivapalan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Yongqiang Zhang
Yongqiang Zhang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jai Vaze
Jai Vaze Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Lutz Breuer
Lutz Breuer University of Giessen
Francis H. S. Chiew
Francis H. S. Chiew Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Jan Seibert
Jan Seibert University of Zurich
Albert van Dijk
Albert van Dijk Australian National University
Stephen P. Charles
Stephen P. Charles Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Guobin Fu
Guobin Fu Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Warrick Dawes
Warrick Dawes Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. Many students complement their environmental studies with programs in sociology or education to better understand societal impacts and promote sustainable change.

For those interested in expanding their understanding of social behaviors that affect environmental policy, exploring online sociology bachelor programs can be a valuable option. These programs often focus on community dynamics and social structures relevant to environmental advocacy.

Career advancement in education-related fields is also supported through flexible options like online edd no dissertation programs. These allow professionals to earn Doctor of Education degrees while balancing work and study commitments.

For educators seeking to transition smoothly, an online eds to edd bridge program provides a streamlined path from a master’s level degree to a doctorate, emphasizing leadership and advanced educational strategies.

Additionally, environmental professionals focused on social work and community outreach may find flexible dsw programs online ideal. These programs combine discipline-specific expertise with practical applications in environmental justice and sustainability initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Neil R. Viney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles