World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
79
Citations
26433
World Ranking
1002
National Ranking
46

Albert van Dijk publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert van Dijk sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 249 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Albert van Dijk D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert van Dijk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Albert van Dijk is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with notable contributions in subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, and Water Science and Technology.

The main topics they investigate include Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Climate Variability and Models, Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations.

Albert van Dijk has published several papers in various scientific journals. Some recent publications include:

  • High-resolution (1 km) Köppen-Geiger maps for 1901-2099 based on constrained CMIP6 projections (2023) in Scientific Data
  • Evaluation of 18 satellite- and model-based soil moisture products using in situ measurements from 826 sensors (2021) in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Global Fully Distributed Parameter Regionalization Based on Observed Streamflow From 4,229 Headwater Catchments (2020) in Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Forest fire fuel through the lens of remote sensing: Review of approaches, challenges and future directions in the remote sensing of biotic determinants of fire behaviour (2021) in Remote Sensing of Environment
  • MSWX: Global 3-Hourly 0.1° Bias-Corrected Meteorological Data Including Near-Real-Time Updates and Forecast Ensembles (2021) in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Albert van Dijk include Luigi J. Renzullo, Marta Yebra, Hylke E. Beck, Geoffrey J. Cary, and Chad Burton. These collaborators have contributed to multiple joint publications, reflecting active research partnerships.

Important publication venues where Albert van Dijk's work appears frequently include Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Remote Sensing of Environment, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, Journal of Hydrology, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Best Publications

  • The Millennium Drought in southeast Australia (2001–2009): Natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society

    Albert I. J. M. van Dijk;Hylke E. Beck;Russell S. Crosbie;Richard A. M. de Jeu

  • MSWEP V2 Global 3-Hourly 0.1° Precipitation: Methodology and Quantitative Assessment

    Hylke E. Beck;Eric F. Wood;Ming Pan;Colby K. Fisher

  • MSWEP: 3-hourly 0.25° global gridded precipitation (1979–2015) by merging gauge, satellite, and reanalysis data

    Hylke E. Beck;Albert I. J. M. van Dijk;Vincenzo Levizzani;Jaap Schellekens

  • Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling

    Hylke E. Beck;Noemi Vergopolan;Ming Pan;Vincenzo Levizzani

  • Trend-preserving blending of passive and active microwave soil moisture retrievals

    Y. Y. Liu;W. A. Dorigo;R. M. Parinussa;R. A. M. de Jeu

  • Drought in the Anthropocene

    Anne F. Van Loon;Tom Gleeson;Julian Clark;Albert I J M Van Dijk

  • Developing an improved soil moisture dataset by blending passive and active microwave satellite-based retrievals

    Y. Y. Liu;Y. Y. Liu;Y. Y. Liu;R. M. Parinussa;W. A. Dorigo;R. A. M. De Jeu

  • Recent reversal in loss of global terrestrial biomass

    Yi Y. Liu;Albert I. J. M. van Dijk;Albert I. J. M. van Dijk;Richard A. M. de Jeu;Josep G. Canadell

  • Rainfall intensity kinetic energy relationships: a critical literature appraisal

    A.I.J.M van Dijk;L.A Bruijnzeel;C.J Rosewell

  • High-resolution (1 km) Köppen-Geiger maps for 1901–2099 based on constrained CMIP6 projections

    Unknown

  • Daily evaluation of 26 precipitation datasets using Stage-IV gauge-radar data for the CONUS

    Hylke E. Beck;Ming Pan;Tirthankar Roy;Graham P. Weedon

  • Planted forests and water in perspective

    Albert I.J.M. van Dijk;Rodney J. Keenan

  • Advancing data assimilation in operational hydrologic forecasting: progresses, challenges, and emerging opportunities

    Yuqiong Liu;Yuqiong Liu;A. Weerts;M. Clark;H.-J Hendricks Franssen

  • Global-scale regionalization of hydrologic model parameters

    Hylke E. Beck;Albert I. J. M. van Dijk;Ad de Roo;Diego G. Miralles

  • Drought in a human-modified world : reframing drought definitions, understanding, and analysis approaches

    Anne F. Van Loon;Kerstin Stahl;Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Julian Clark

  • Global evaluation of four AVHRR–NDVI data sets: Intercomparison and assessment against Landsat imagery

    Hylke E. Beck;Tim R. McVicar;Albert I.J.M. van Dijk;Jaap Schellekens

  • Assessing the accuracy of blending Landsat–MODIS surface reflectances in two landscapes with contrasting spatial and temporal dynamics: A framework for algorithm selection

    Irina V. Emelyanova;Tim R. McVicar;Thomas G. Van Niel;Ling Tao Li

  • A review of historic and future hydrological changes in the Murray-Darling Basin

    Marc Leblanc;Sarah Tweed;Albert Van Dijk;Bertrand Timbal

  • Reduced streamflow in water-stressed climates consistent with CO2 effects on vegetation

    Anna M. Ukkola;I. Colin Prentice;I. Colin Prentice;Trevor F. Keenan;Albert I. J. M. van Dijk

  • Global patterns in base flow index and recession based on streamflow observations from 3394 catchments

    Hylke E. Beck;Albert I. J. M. van Dijk;Diego G. Miralles;Richard A. M. de Jeu

  • Modelling rainfall interception by vegetation of variable density using an adapted analytical model. Part 1. Model description.

    A.I.J.M van Dijk;L.A Bruijnzeel

  • Scaling of potential evapotranspiration with MODIS data reproduces flux observations and catchment water balance observations across Australia

    Juan Pablo Guerschman;Albert I.J.M. Van Dijk;Guillaume Mattersdorf;Jason Beringer

Frequent Co-Authors

Hylke E. Beck
Hylke E. Beck King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Luigi Renzullo
Luigi Renzullo Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Tim R. McVicar
Tim R. McVicar Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Yi Y. Liu
Yi Y. Liu Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
Jason P. Evans
Jason P. Evans University of New South Wales
Diego G. Miralles
Diego G. Miralles Ghent University
Ming Pan
Ming Pan Princeton University
Matthew F. McCabe
Matthew F. McCabe King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Neil R. Viney
Neil R. Viney Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Eric F. Wood
Eric F. Wood Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career possibilities. An online sociology degree bachelors offers valuable insights into human behavior and societal impacts on the environment, complementing core scientific knowledge with social perspectives.

Advancing to doctoral studies is also an option with programs like 1 year phd programs online no dissertation, which provide accelerated paths for professionals aiming to deepen their expertise without the traditional dissertation demands. This flexibility benefits those balancing busy careers with continued education.

Educators in environmental fields may benefit from enrolling in an eds to edd bridge program, a smooth transition that enhances leadership skills and research capabilities needed for higher academic or administrative roles.

Finally, expanding into interdisciplinary roles is possible through specialized credentials such as online dsw programs in social work. These programs prepare students for careers addressing social and environmental justice, a critical element in sustainable development.

Best Scientists Citing Albert van Dijk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles