World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
85
Citations
36291
World Ranking
733
National Ranking
35

Tim R. McVicar publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim R. McVicar sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 292 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Tim R. McVicar D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim R. McVicar sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Tim R. McVicar is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily centers on Environmental Science, with a focus on subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Environmental Engineering, and Water Science and Technology.

Their work covers a range of topics related to climate and environmental dynamics, such as:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Cryospheric studies and observations

Frequent co-authors in McVicar's research include Yuting Yang, Hylke E. Beck, César Azorín-Molina, Thomas G. Van Niel, and Diego G. Miralles. Their collaborative efforts can be seen across multiple publications.

McVicar has published extensively in several key journals, including:

  • Remote Sensing of Environment (13 publications)
  • Environmental Research Letters (5 publications)
  • Journal of Hydrology (5 publications)
  • Water Resources Research (4 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (4 publications)

Recent papers by or involving Tim R. McVicar include:

  • Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO 2, 2020, New Phytologist
  • Multifaceted characteristics of dryland aridity changes in a warming world, 2021, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • High-resolution (1 km) Köppen-Geiger maps for 1901-2099 based on constrained CMIP6 projections, 2023, Scientific Data
  • Summer soil drying exacerbated by earlier spring greening of northern vegetation, 2020, Science Advances
  • Evapotranspiration on a greening Earth, 2023, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment

Best Publications

  • Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution

    Hylke E. Beck;Niklaus E. Zimmermann;Tim R. McVicar;Tim R. McVicar;Noemi Vergopolan

  • Estimating Land Surface Evaporation: A Review of Methods Using Remotely Sensed Surface Temperature Data

    Jetse D. Kalma;Tim R. McVicar;Matthew F. McCabe

  • Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind speeds; implications for evaporation

    Tim R. McVicar;Michael L. Roderick;Randall J. Donohue;Ling Tao Li

  • MSWEP V2 Global 3-Hourly 0.1° Precipitation: Methodology and Quantitative Assessment

    Hylke E. Beck;Eric F. Wood;Ming Pan;Colby K. Fisher

  • Coupled estimation of 500 m and 8-day resolution global evapotranspiration and gross primary production in 2002-2017

    Yongqiang Zhang;Yongqiang Zhang;Dongdong Kong;Rong Gan;Rong Gan;Francis H.S. Chiew

  • Multi-decadal trends in global terrestrial evapotranspiration and its components

    Yongqiang Zhang;Jorge L. Peña-Arancibia;Tim R. McVicar;Tim R. McVicar;Francis H. S. Chiew

  • Estimating actual, potential, reference crop and pan evaporation using standard meteorological data: a pragmatic synthesis

    T. A. McMahon;M. C. Peel;L. Lowe;R. Srikanthan

  • Preprocessing EO-1 Hyperion hyperspectral data to support the application of agricultural indexes

    B. Datt;T.R. McVicar;T.G. Van Niel;D.L.B. Jupp

  • On the importance of including vegetation dynamics in Budyko's hydrological model

    Randall Donohue;Randall Donohue;Michael Roderick;Tim R McVicar

  • Impact of CO2 fertilization on maximum foliage cover across the globe's warm, arid environments

    Randall J. Donohue;Michael L. Roderick;Michael L. Roderick;Tim R. McVicar;Graham D. Farquhar

  • Multifaceted characteristics of dryland aridity changes in a warming world

    Xu Lian;Shilong Piao;Shilong Piao;Anping Chen;Chris Huntingford

  • Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO2

    Anthony P. Walker;Martin G. De Kauwe;Ana Bastos;Soumaya Belmecheri

  • High-resolution (1 km) Köppen-Geiger maps for 1901–2099 based on constrained CMIP6 projections

    Unknown

  • Roots, storms and soil pores: Incorporating key ecohydrological processes into Budyko’s hydrological model

    Randall J. Donohue;Michael L. Roderick;Tim R. McVicar

  • Assessing the ability of potential evaporation formulations to capture the dynamics in evaporative demand within a changing climate

    Randall J. Donohue;Randall J. Donohue;Tim R. McVicar;Michael L. Roderick

  • Wind speed climatology and trends for Australia, 1975-2006: Capturing the stilling phenomenon and comparison with near-surface reanalysis output

    Tim R. McVicar;Thomas G. Van Niel;Ling Tao Li;Michael L. Roderick

  • Global-scale regionalization of hydrologic model parameters

    Hylke E. Beck;Albert I. J. M. van Dijk;Ad de Roo;Diego G. Miralles

  • Summer soil drying exacerbated by earlier spring greening of northern vegetation.

    Xu Lian;Shilong Piao;Shilong Piao;Laurent Z. X. Li;Yue Li

  • Hydrologic implications of vegetation response to elevated CO2 in climate projections

    Yuting Yang;Yuting Yang;Yuting Yang;Michael L. Roderick;Michael L. Roderick;Shulei Zhang;Tim R. McVicar;Tim R. McVicar

  • Evapotranspiration on a greening Earth

    Unknown

  • Spatially distributing monthly reference evapotranspiration and pan evaporation considering topographic influences

    Tim R. McVicar;Thomas G. Van Niel;LingTao Li;Michael F. Hutchinson

  • Global evaluation of four AVHRR–NDVI data sets: Intercomparison and assessment against Landsat imagery

    Hylke E. Beck;Tim R. McVicar;Albert I.J.M. van Dijk;Jaap Schellekens

  • Publisher Correction: Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution.

    Hylke E. Beck;Niklaus E. Zimmermann;Tim R. McVicar;Tim R. McVicar;Noemi Vergopolan

  • Estimating land surface evaporation: a review of methods using remotely sensed surface temperature data | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository

    Jetse D. Kalma;Tim R. McVicar;Matthew F. McCabe

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael L. Roderick
Michael L. Roderick Australian National University
Yuting Yang
Yuting Yang Tsinghua University
Cesar Azorin-Molina
Cesar Azorin-Molina Spanish National Research Council
Albert van Dijk
Albert van Dijk Australian National University
Hylke E. Beck
Hylke E. Beck King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Deliang Chen
Deliang Chen Tsinghua University
Yongqiang Zhang
Yongqiang Zhang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Diego G. Miralles
Diego G. Miralles Ghent University
Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano
Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano Spanish National Research Council
Francis H. S. Chiew
Francis H. S. Chiew Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Doctoral programs online no dissertation options are increasingly popular for professionals seeking flexible, research-focused learning without the extensive commitment of a traditional dissertation.

Many students choose accredited eds to edd programs to ensure their online education meets high academic standards. These programs often cater to educators looking to specialize in environmental education or policy, blending practical knowledge with leadership skills.

For those drawn to social work within environmental contexts, online dsw programs in social work provide affordable, accessible routes to doctoral qualifications. This path supports careers focused on community resilience and environmental justice, which are critical in today’s global landscape.

Additionally, pursuing an online general studies bachelor degree cheap allows students to build a strong interdisciplinary foundation. This flexible degree is ideal for those seeking to tailor their education toward environmental studies while managing cost and time commitments effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Tim R. McVicar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles