World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
6428
World Ranking
8830
National Ranking
411

Nathan Pelletier publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan Pelletier sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 77 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Nathan Pelletier D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan Pelletier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nathan Pelletier is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and specializes in the field of Environmental Science. Their research encompasses a broad range of subfields including Environmental Engineering, Ecology, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Food Science, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's work primarily focuses on topics related to sustainability and environmental impact within agricultural and food systems. Key topics addressed in their research include:

  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Animal Nutrition and Physiology

Pelletier has contributed to several research papers with significant citation counts. Notable recent publications include:

  • Interventions for improving the productivity and environmental performance of global aquaculture for future food security, 2021, published in One Earth
  • Farm-level decision support tools: A review of methodological choices and their consistency with principles of sustainability assessment, 2020, published in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Waste valorization technology options for the egg and broiler industries: A review and recommendations, 2020, published in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Allocation methods in life cycle assessments (LCAs) of agri-food co-products and food waste valorization systems: Systematic review and recommendations, 2023, published in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Design considerations for net zero energy buildings for intensive, confined poultry production: A review of current insights, knowledge gaps, and future directions, 2021, published in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

The scientist frequently publishes in journals that focus on cleaner production, sustainability, and resource conservation. The main publication venues for their research include:

  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Sustainability
  • Sustainable Production and Consumption
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling

Pelletier collaborates often with several co-authors, reflecting a network of scholarly interaction. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Vivek Arulnathan
  • Ian Turner
  • Nicole Bamber
  • Mohammad Davoud Heidari
  • Florian Grassauer

Best Publications

  • Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States

    Unknown

  • Forecasting potential global environmental costs of livestock production 2000–2050

    Nathan Pelletier;Peter Tyedmers

  • Energy Intensity of Agriculture and Food Systems

    Nathan Pelletier;Eric Audsley;Sonja Brodt;Tara Garnett

  • Not All Salmon Are Created Equal: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Global Salmon Farming Systems

    Nathan Pelletier;Peter Tyedmers;Ulf Sonesson;Astrid Scholz

  • Feeding farmed salmon: Is organic better?

    N. Pelletier;P. Tyedmers

  • Environmental performance in the US broiler poultry sector: Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas, ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions

    Unknown

  • Impact categories for life cycle assessment research of seafood production systems: Review and prospectus

    Nathan L. Pelletier;Nathan W. Ayer;Peter H. Tyedmers;Sarah A. Kruse

  • Scenario Modeling Potential Eco-Efficiency Gains from a Transition to Organic Agriculture: Life Cycle Perspectives on Canadian Canola, Corn, Soy, and Wheat Production

    N. Pelletier;N. Arsenault;P. Tyedmers

  • Comparing sources and analysis of uncertainty in consequential and attributional life cycle assessment: review of current practice and recommendations

    Nicole Bamber;Ian Turner;Vivek Arulnathan;Yang Li

  • Co-Product Allocation in Life Cycle Assessments of Seafood Production Systems: Review of Problems and Strategies

    Nathan W. Ayer;Peter H. Tyedmers;Nathan L. Pelletier;Ulf Sonesson

  • Rationales for and limitations of preferred solutions for multi-functionality problems in LCA: is increased consistency possible?

    Nathan Pelletier;Fulvio Ardente;Miguel Brandão;Camillo De Camillis

  • Life Cycle Assessment of Frozen Tilapia Fillets From Indonesian Lake‐Based and Pond‐Based Intensive Aquaculture Systems

    Nathan Pelletier;Peter Tyedmers

  • Allocation solutions for secondary material production and end of life recovery: Proposals for product policy initiatives

    K. Allacker;F. Mathieux;S. Manfredi;N. Pelletier

  • Interventions for improving the productivity and environmental performance of global aquaculture for future food security

    Patrik John Gustav Henriksson;Patrik John Gustav Henriksson;Patrik John Gustav Henriksson;Max Troell;Max Troell;Lauren Katherine Banks;Lauren Katherine Banks;Ben Belton;Ben Belton

  • An Ecological Economic Critique of the Use of Market Information in Life Cycle Assessment Research

    Nathan Pelletier;Peter Tyedmers

  • Life Cycle Considerations for Improving Sustainability Assessments in Seafood Awareness Campaigns

    Nathan Pelletier;Peter Tyedmers

  • Life cycle assessment of high- and low-profitability commodity and deep-bedded niche swine production systems in the Upper Midwestern United States

    Unknown

  • Comparative environmental performance of artisanal and commercial feed use in Peruvian freshwater aquaculture

    Angel Avadí;Nathan Pelletier;Joël Aubin;Stéphane Ralite

  • Nutritional Attributes, Substitutability, Scalability, and Environmental Intensity of an Illustrative Subset of Current and Future Protein Sources for Aquaculture Feeds: Joint Consideration of Potential Synergies and Trade-offs

    Nathan Pelletier;Dane H. Klinger;Neil A. Sims;Janice Renee Yoshioka

  • The European Commission Organisation Environmental Footprint method: comparison with other methods, and rationales for key requirements

    Unknown

  • Life cycle assessment of Canadian egg products, with differentiation by hen housing system type

    Nathan Pelletier

  • Farm-level decision support tools: A review of methodological choices and their consistency with principles of sustainability assessment

    Vivek Arulnathan;Mohammad Davoud Heidari;Maurice Doyon;Eric Li

  • Waste valorization technology options for the egg and broiler industries: A review and recommendations

    Farah Kanani;Mohammad Davoud Heidari;Brandon H. Gilroyed;Nathan Pelletier

  • Design considerations for net zero energy buildings for intensive, confined poultry production: A review of current insights, knowledge gaps, and future directions

    Y. Li;V. Arulnathan;M.D. Heidari;N. Pelletier

  • Proposed Local Ecological Impact Categories and Indicators for Life Cycle Assessment of Aquaculture A Salmon Aquaculture Case Study

    Jennifer S. Ford;Nathan L. Pelletier;Friederike Ziegler;Astrid J. Scholz

  • Social Sustainability in Trade and Development Policy

    Nathan Pelletier;Eda Ustaoglu;Catherine Benoit;Greg Norris

  • Scenarios for shale gas development and their related land use impacts in the Baltic Basin, Northern Poland

    Claudia Baranzelli;Ine Vandecasteele;Ricardo Ribeiro Barranco;Ines Mari i Rivero

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Tyedmers
Peter Tyedmers Dalhousie University
Max Troell
Max Troell Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Melanie D. Jones
Melanie D. Jones University of British Columbia
Ulf Sonesson
Ulf Sonesson RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
Miguel Brandão
Miguel Brandão Riga Technical University
John N. Kittinger
John N. Kittinger Arizona State University
Tina M. Widowski
Tina M. Widowski University of Guelph

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of online educational pathways that complement this field. For educators interested in environmental education or policy, exploring the edd no dissertation programs allows for advanced learning without the added pressure of a dissertation. This can be ideal for working professionals balancing career growth with academic goals.

For those aiming to elevate their credentials further, transitioning through the best online eds to edd programs is a strategic step. These programs provide a streamlined path from a master's degree in education to a doctoral degree, often with flexible schedules tailored to professionals.

Beyond education-focused degrees, social work plays an essential role in environmental justice and community advocacy. The cheapest online dsw programs offer cost-effective routes for those interested in doctoral-level social work education with an environmental lens.

For students exploring broader academic interests, low-cost alternatives like the low cost online general studies degree provide interdisciplinary foundations that can support diverse career pathways in environmental studies and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Nathan Pelletier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles