World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
9745
World Ranking
5948
National Ranking
168

Alida A. Gouw publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alida A. Gouw sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 122 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Alida A. Gouw D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alida A. Gouw sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alida A. Gouw is affiliated with the VU University Medical Center in the Netherlands and contributes extensively to research at the intersection of neuroscience and medicine. Their primary research focus lies within cognitive neuroscience, with substantial work related to brain connectivity, neural dynamics, and Alzheimer's disease.

Their fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine

Within these fields, their subfields of study cover:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Physiology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

The main research topics Alida A. Gouw has worked on consist of:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural Dynamics and Brain Function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Reproducibility of EEG Functional Connectivity in Alzheimer's Disease, 2020, Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • In Vivo Tau Pathology Is Associated with Synaptic Loss and Altered Synaptic Function, 2021, Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • A Multiscale Brain Network Model Links Alzheimer's Disease-Mediated Neuronal Hyperactivity to Large-Scale Oscillatory Slowing, 2022, Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • Resting-State Oscillations Reveal Disturbed Excitation-Inhibition Ratio in Alzheimer's Disease Patients, 2023, Scientific Reports
  • Sensitive and Reproducible MEG Resting-State Metrics of Functional Connectivity in Alzheimer's Disease, 2022, Alzheimer s Research & Therapy

Frequent co-authors of Alida A. Gouw include:

  • Cornelis J. Stam
  • Philip Scheltens
  • Anne M van Nifterick
  • Arjan Hillebrand
  • Willem de Haan

Research by Alida A. Gouw has been published predominantly in these venues:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • Network Neuroscience
  • Neurobiology of Aging
  • Brain Communications

Best Publications

  • Preclinical Alzheimer's disease: Definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria.

    Bruno Dubois;Harald Hampel;Harald Hampel;Howard H. Feldman;Philip Scheltens

  • Heterogeneity of small vessel disease: a systematic review of MRI and histopathology correlations

    Alida A Gouw;Alexandra Seewann;Wiesje M van der Flier;Frederik Barkhof

  • Progression of white matter hyperintensities and incidence of new lacunes over a 3-year period: the Leukoaraiosis and Disability study.

    A.A. Gouw;W.M. van der Flier;F. Fazekas;E.C.W. van Straaten

  • Direction of information flow in large-scale resting-state networks is frequency-dependent

    Arjan Hillebrand;Prejaas Tewarie;Edwin van Dellen;Meichen Yu

  • Heterogeneity of White Matter Hyperintensities in Alzheimer's Disease: Post-Mortem Quantitative MRI and Neuropathology:

    A. A. Gouw;A. Seewann;H. Vrenken;W. M. van der Flier

  • Incident lacunes influence cognitive decline: the LADIS study.

    H. Jokinen;A.A. Gouw;S. Madureira;R. Ylikoski

  • Venous Drainage in Perimesencephalic Hemorrhage

    Irene C. van der Schaaf;Birgitta K. Velthuis;Alida Gouw;Gabriel J. E. Rinkel

  • White matter changes and late-life depressive symptoms: longitudinal study.

    Andrew Teodorczuk;John T. O'Brien;Michael J. Firbank;Leonardo Pantoni

  • Brain atrophy accelerates cognitive decline in cerebral small vessel disease: the LADIS study.

    H. Jokinen;J. Lipsanen;R. Schmidt;F. Fazekas

  • Assessing mental flexibility: Neuroanatomical and neuropsychological correlates of the Trail Making Test in elderly people

    Joukje M Oosterman;Raymond L C Vogels;Barbera van Harten;Alida A Gouw

  • Brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in patients with heart failure

    Raymond L.C. Vogels;Wiesje M. van der Flier;Barbera van Harten;Alida A. Gouw

  • Selective impairment of hippocampus and posterior hub areas in Alzheimer’s disease: an MEG-based multiplex network study

    Meichen Yu;Marjolein M. A. Engels;Arjan Hillebrand;Elisabeth C. W. van Straaten

  • Clinical correlates of quantitative EEG in Parkinson disease : A systematic review

    Victor J. Geraedts;Lennard I. Boon;Johan Marinus;Alida A. Gouw

  • Location of lacunar infarcts correlates with cognition in a sample of non-disabled subjects with age-related white-matter changes: the LADIS study

    S Benisty;A A Gouw;R Porcher;S Madureira

  • Different functional connectivity and network topology in behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: an EEG study

    Meichen Yu;Alida A. Gouw;Arjan Hillebrand;Betty M. Tijms

  • Reproducibility of EEG functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease

    Casper T. Briels;Deborah N. Schoonhoven;Cornelis J. Stam;Hanneke de Waal

  • EEG spectral analysis as a putative early prognostic biomarker in nondemented, amyloid positive subjects

    Alida A. Gouw;Astrid M. Alsema;Betty M. Tijms;Andreas Borta

  • Simple versus complex assessment of white matter hyperintensities in relation to physical performance and cognition: the LADIS study.

    A.A. Gouw;W.M. Van der Flier;E.C.W. van Straaten;F. Barkhof

  • Neuroimaging and correlates of cognitive function among patients with heart failure

    Raymond L.C. Vogels;Raymond L.C. Vogels;Joukje M. Oosterman;Barbera van Harten;Alida A. Gouw

  • White Matter Lesion Progression in LADIS: Frequency, Clinical Effects, and Sample Size Calculations

    R. Schmidt;A. Berghold;H. Jokinen;A.A. Gouw

  • Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Cognition in the Leukoariosis and Disability in the Elderly Study

    R. Schmidt;S. Ropele;J. Ferro;S. Madureira

  • Mental flexibility: Neuroanatomical and neuropsychological correlates of the Trail Making Test in elderly people

    J.M. Oosterman;R.L.C. Vogels;B. van Harten;A.A. Gouw

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Cornelis J. Stam
Cornelis J. Stam Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Frederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof University College London
Wiesje M. van der Flier
Wiesje M. van der Flier Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Domenico Inzitari
Domenico Inzitari University of Florence
Leonardo Pantoni
Leonardo Pantoni University of Milan
Timo Erkinjuntti
Timo Erkinjuntti University of Helsinki
Franz Fazekas
Franz Fazekas Medical University of Graz
Gunhild Waldemar
Gunhild Waldemar Copenhagen University Hospital
Arjan Hillebrand
Arjan Hillebrand Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Alida A. Gouw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles