World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 82 932 826 496 430 224 27489

Michael Carey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Carey between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Carey published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2002. 8 of the 275 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2002. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
1984 2025

275 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Carey: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 1
1986 2
1987 0
1988 3
1989 4
1990 3
1991 4
1992 6
1993 5
1994 12
1995 5
1996 8
1997 11
1998 8
1999 13
2000 7
2001 7
2002 17
2003 6
2004 16
2005 9
2006 10
2007 14
2008 6
2009 12
2010 12
2011 2
2012 12
2013 11
2014 6
2015 6
2016 4
2017 8
2018 3
2019 3
2020 4
2021 3
2022 0
2023 3
2024 3
2025 5
Total 275
Download as CSV

Michael Carey publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Carey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 217–226 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 224 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98 224
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Carey D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Carey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60 82
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael Carey is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a focus on Molecular Biology as a subfield.

The scientist's work addresses a variety of topics, including:

  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Michael Carey has contributed to multiple well-known academic venues. Some frequent publication venues include:

  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • Science
  • Immunity
  • Cell Stem Cell
  • Genes & Development

The recent papers authored or co-authored by Michael Carey highlight a range of studies and discoveries:

  • The histone H3-H4 tetramer is a copper reductase enzyme, 2020, Science
  • The Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC) influences Mediator binding but not promoter-enhancer looping, 2021, Genes & Development
  • The transcription factor NF-κB orchestrates nucleosome remodeling during the primary response to Toll-like receptor 4 signaling, 2024, Immunity
  • The characterization of Mediator 12 and 13 as conditional positive gene regulators in Arabidopsis, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Alternative splicing of a chromatin modifier alters the transcriptional regulatory programs of stem cell maintenance and neuronal differentiation, 2024, Cell Stem Cell

Frequent co-authors working alongside Michael Carey include:

  • An-Chieh Feng
  • Allison E. Daly
  • Fei Sun
  • Stephen T. Smale
  • Xianglong Tan

Best Publications

  • The Role of Chromatin during Transcription

    Bing Li;Michael Carey;Jerry L. Workman

  • A mechanism for hormone-independent prostate cancer through modulation of androgen receptor signaling by the HER-2/neu tyrosine kinase.

    Noah Craft;Yuriy Shostak;Michael Carey;Charles L. Sawyers

  • DNA recognition by GAL4: structure of a protein-DNA complex

    Ronen Marmorstein;Michael Carey;Michael Carey;Mark Ptashne;Stephen C. Harrison;Stephen C. Harrison

  • The Enhanceosome and Transcriptional Synergy

    Michael Carey

  • A Unifying Model for the Selective Regulation of Inducible Transcription By CpG Islands and Nucleosome Remodeling

    Vladimir R. Ramirez-Carrozzi;Daniel Braas;Dev M. Bhatt;Christine S. Cheng

  • Direct interaction between DNMT1 and G9a coordinates DNA and histone methylation during replication

    Pierre-Olivier Estève;Hang Gyeong Chin;Andrea Smallwood;George R. Feehery

  • Transcriptional Regulation in Eukaryotes: Concepts, Strategies and Techniques

    Michael Carey;Stephen T.smale

  • A mechanism for synergistic activation of a mammalian gene by GAL4 derivatives.

    Michael Carey;Young-Sun Lin;Michael R. Green;Mark Ptashne

  • Functional cooperation between HP1 and DNMT1 mediates gene silencing

    Andrea Smallwood;Pierre-Olivier Estève;Sriharsa Pradhan;Michael Carey

  • Combined action of PHD and chromo domains directs the Rpd3S HDAC to transcribed chromatin.

    Bing Li;Madelaine Gogol;Mike Carey;Mike Carey;Daeyoup Lee;Daeyoup Lee

  • An amino-terminal fragment of GAL4 binds DNA as a dimer.

    Michael Carey;Hitoshi Kakidani;Janet Leatherwood;Farzad Mostashari

  • Effect of ambient temperature on human skeletal muscle metabolism during fatiguing submaximal exercise.

    J. M. Parkin;M. F. Carey;S. Zhao;M. A. Febbraio

  • The effect of whey isolate and resistance training on strength, body composition and plasma glutamine

    Paul J. Cribb;Andrew D. Williams;Michael F. Carey;Alan Hayes

  • Mechanism of action of a yeast activator: direct effect of GAL4 derivatives on mammalian TFIID-promoter interactions.

    Masami Horikoshi;Michael F. Carey;Hitoshi Kakidani;Robert G. Roeder

  • A unified nomenclature for protein subunits of mediator complexes linking transcriptional regulators to RNA polymerase II.

    Henri Marc Bourbon;Andres Aguilera;Aseem Z. Ansari;Francisco J. Asturias

  • GAL4 derivatives function alone and synergistically with mammalian activators in vitro

    Young-Sun Lin;Michael F. Carey;Mark Ptashne;Michael R. Green

  • Polymerase II promoter activation: closed complex formation and ATP-driven start site opening

    Weidong Wang;Michael Carey;Jay D. Gralla

  • Changes in performance, muscle metabolites, enzymes and fibre types after short sprint training.

    Brian Dawson;Martin Fitzsimons;Simon Green;Carmél Goodman

  • Moderate-intensity resistance exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure improves strength, endurance, heart rate variability, and forearm blood flow.

    Steve E. Selig;Michael F. Carey;David G. Menzies;Jeremy Patterson

  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)

    Michael F. Carey;Craig L. Peterson;Stephen T. Smale

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen T. Smale
Stephen T. Smale University of California, Los Angeles
Lily Wu
Lily Wu University of California, Los Angeles
Sanjiv S. Gambhir
Sanjiv S. Gambhir Stanford University
Craig L. Peterson
Craig L. Peterson University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Mark A. Febbraio
Mark A. Febbraio Monash University
Michael J. McKenna
Michael J. McKenna Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Mark Hargreaves
Mark Hargreaves University of Melbourne
John J. O'Connor
John J. O'Connor University College Dublin
Henry Krum
Henry Krum Monash University
Mark Ptashne
Mark Ptashne Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology opens doors to several fast-growing healthcare careers and flexible online degree options in the USA. If you are looking to pivot your career or advance your education, consider the many pathways that align with your scientific background.

For those interested in a rapid transition to nursing, there are accelerated nursing programs for non nurses available online, allowing you to earn a nursing degree even without previous experience. Similarly, online accelerated bsn programs can help registered nurses quickly advance their credentials, sometimes in just six months.

Many biology graduates consider advanced practice roles. If you’re curious about how many years to become a nurse practitioner, online programs offer flexible and efficient routes to qualification. Specializing further, the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner salary can be particularly attractive for those with an interest in mental health, making this a high-demand, well-rewarded role.

Whether you take the clinical route or remain in scientific research, plenty of accessible online degrees are available to help shape your career in the health and biosciences field.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Carey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles