World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
56
Citations
12823
World Ranking
3613
National Ranking
248

Martin Schnaiter publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Schnaiter sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 186 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Martin Schnaiter D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Schnaiter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Schnaiter is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany and conducts research primarily in the domains of Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their work extensively covers the subfields of Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering.

The scientist's research interests focus on key topics such as:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Icing and De-icing Technologies

Schnaiter has contributed to several publications in prominent scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques

Their scientific output includes papers published between 2020 and 2022, among them:

  • Observations of Clouds, Aerosols, Precipitation, and Surface Radiation over the Southern Ocean: An Overview of CAPRICORN, MARCUS, MICRE, and SOCRATES, 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • High homogeneous freezing onsets of sulfuric acid aerosol at cirrus temperatures, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Sources, Occurrence and Characteristics of Fluorescent Biological Aerosol Particles Measured Over the Pristine Southern Ocean, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Evidence for Secondary Ice Production in Southern Ocean Maritime Boundary Layer Clouds, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Aerosol-optics model for the backscatter depolarisation ratio of mineral dust particles, 2020, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Schnaiter's work, with frequent co-authors including Emma Järvinen, Greg M. McFarquhar, Fritz Waitz, Guanglang Xu, and Paul J. DeMott. Among these, the collaboration with Emma Järvinen stands out as the most frequent, followed by Greg M. McFarquhar and Fritz Waitz.

Best Publications

  • Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers

    E. Weingartner;H. Saathoff;M. Schnaiter;N. Streit

  • UV-VIS-NIR spectral optical properties of soot and soot-containing aerosols

    M. Schnaiter;H. Horvath;O. Möhler;K.-H. Naumann

  • Absorption amplification of black carbon internally mixed with secondary organic aerosol

    M. Schnaiter;C. Linke;O. Möhler;K.-H. Naumann

  • Mixed-Phase Clouds: Progress and Challenges

    A. Korolev;G. McFarquhar;P. R. Field;P. R. Field;C. Franklin

  • Heterogeneous nucleation of ice particles on glassy aerosols under cirrus conditions

    Benjamin J. Murray;Theodore W. Wilson;Steven Dobbie;Zhiqiang Cui

  • The Arctic Cloud Puzzle: Using ACLOUD/PASCAL Multiplatform Observations to Unravel the Role of Clouds and Aerosol Particles in Arctic Amplification

    Manfred Wendisch;Andreas Macke;André Ehrlich;Christof Lüpkes

  • Efficiency of the deposition mode ice nucleation on mineral dust particles

    O. Möhler;P. R. Field;P. R. Field;P. Connolly;S. Benz

  • Spectral light absorption by ambient aerosols influenced by biomass burning in the Amazon Basin ? I. Comparison and field calibration of absorption measurement techniques

    O. Schmid;P. Artaxo;W. P. Arnott;D. Chand

  • The effect of organic coating on the heterogeneous ice nucleation efficiency of mineral dust aerosols

    O. Möhler;S. Benz;H. Saathoff;M. Schnaiter

  • The absorption Ångström exponent of black carbon: from numerical aspects

    Chao Liu;Chul Eddy Chung;Yan Yin;Martin Schnaiter

  • Observations of clouds, aerosols, precipitation, and surface radiation over the southern ocean

    Greg Michael McFarquhar;Christopher S. Bretherton;Roger Marchand;Alain Protat

  • Effect of sulfuric acid coating on heterogeneous ice nucleation by soot aerosol particles

    O. Möhler;S. Büttner;C. Linke;M. Schnaiter

  • Coating of soot and (NH4)2SO4 particles by ozonolysis products of α-pinene

    H. Saathoff;K.-H. Naumann;M. Schnaiter;W. Schöck

  • Experimental investigation of homogeneous freezing of sulphuric acid particles in the aerosol chamber AIDA

    O. Möhler;O. Stetzer;S. Schaefers;C. Linke

  • Relationship of visibility, aerosol optical thickness and aerosol size distribution in an ageing air mass over South-West Germany

    D. Bäumer;B. Vogel;S. Versick;R. Rinke

  • ML-CIRRUS : The airborne experiment on natural cirrus and contrail cirrus with the high-altitude long-range research aircraft HALO

    Christiane Voigt;Ulrich Schumann;Andreas Minikin;Ahmed Abdelmonem

  • Fluorescent biological aerosol particles measured with the Waveband Integrated Bioaerosol Sensor WIBS-4: laboratory tests combined with a one year field study

    E. Toprak;M. Schnaiter

  • Aerosol characteristics and particle production in the upper troposphere over the Amazon Basin

    Meinrat O. Andreae;Meinrat O. Andreae;Armin Afchine;Rachel I. Albrecht;Bruna Amorim Holanda

  • Some ice nucleation characteristics of Asian and Saharan desert dust

    P. R. Field;P. R. Field;O. Möhler;P. Connolly;M. Krämer

  • Single Particle Soot Photometer intercomparison at the AIDA chamber

    M. Laborde;M. Schnaiter;C. Linke;H. Saathoff

  • Optical properties and mineralogical composition of different Saharan mineral dust samples: a laboratory study

    C. Linke;O. Möhler;A. Veres;Á. Mohácsi

  • ACRIDICON–CHUVA Campaign: Studying Tropical Deep Convective Clouds and Precipitation over Amazonia Using the New German Research Aircraft HALO

    Manfred Wendisch;Ulrich Pöschl;Meinrat O. Andreae;Luiz A. T. Machado

Frequent Co-Authors

Ottmar Möhler
Ottmar Möhler Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Harald Saathoff
Harald Saathoff Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Martina Krämer
Martina Krämer Forschungszentrum Jülich
Bernadett Weinzierl
Bernadett Weinzierl University of Vienna
Manfred Wendisch
Manfred Wendisch Leipzig University
Martin Gallagher
Martin Gallagher University of Manchester
Meinrat O. Andreae
Meinrat O. Andreae Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Martin Gysel
Martin Gysel Paul Scherrer Institute
Paul Connolly
Paul Connolly University of Manchester
Johannes Schneider
Johannes Schneider Max Planck Institute for Chemistry

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various specialized fields. Students interested in the Earth's physical structure and processes can consider pursuing a geologist degree online. This path is ideal for those passionate about studying rock formations, mineral resources, and environmental impacts.

Another growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which combines technology with data analysis to address environmental challenges. The best gis programs in the us equip students with skills to map, analyze, and manage environmental data effectively.

For those interested in leadership roles influencing public policy and community sustainability efforts, earning a degree from the best online mpa programs can be an excellent choice. This degree prepares students for management positions in government and nonprofit sectors focused on environmental programs.

Understanding social dynamics is crucial for environmental advocacy and community engagement. An online bachelors degree programs in sociology provides insight into societal trends and behaviors affecting environmental policies and sustainability initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Schnaiter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles