World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
7398
World Ranking
6746
National Ranking
301

L. L. Cogger publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. L. Cogger sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 145 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

L. L. Cogger D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. L. Cogger sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

L. L. Cogger is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada. Their academic profile is characterized by a focused connection to this institution, which serves as the primary base for their research activities.

Information on recent research papers authored by L. L. Cogger is not available, so insights into their specific contributions through publications cannot be detailed. Similarly, data about frequent co-authors, which would shed light on collaborative networks, is also not present.

No records are available regarding frequent publication venues, leaving the typical outlets or journals for their work unspecified. Likewise, there is no information on book publications or associations with particular publishers.

L. L. Cogger's main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of research are not provided, which limits a detailed description of their thematic focus or areas of specialization.

There is no data on awards or honors received by L. L. Cogger, which means no distinctions or formal recognitions can be reported.

Based on the absence of any mention of deceased status, L. L. Cogger is currently living.

Best Publications

  • A global thermospheric model based on mass spectrometer and incoherent scatter data MSIS, 1. N2 density and temperature

    A. E. Hedin;J. E. Salah;J. V. Evans;C. A. Reber

  • WINDII, the wind imaging interferometer on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite

    G. G. Shepherd;G. Thuillier;W. A. Gault;B. H. Solheim

  • The double oval UV auroral distribution. 1: Implications for the mapping of auroral arcs

    R. D. Elphinstone;J. S. Murphree;D. J. Hearn;L. L. Cogger

  • Far Ultraviolet Imaging from the Image Spacecraft: 1. System Design

    S. B. Mende;H. Heetderks;H. U. Frey;M. Lampton

  • Canopus — A ground-based instrument array for remote sensing the high latitude ionosphere during the ISTP/GGS program

    G. Rostoker;J. C. Samson;F. Creutzberg;T. J. Hughes

  • Mapping using the Tsyganenko Long Magnetospheric Model and its relationship to Viking auroral images

    R. D. Elphinstone;D. Hearn;J. S. Murphree;L. L. Cogger

  • Observations of field line resonances, auroral arcs, and auroral vortex structures

    Unknown

  • A reexamination of the O I 6300-Å nightglow

    Unknown

  • An ultraviolet auroral imager for the Viking spacecraft

    C. D. Anger;S. K. Babey;A. Lyle Broadfoot;R. G. Brown

  • Characteristics of polar cap Sun‐aligned arcs

    S. Ismail;D. D. Wallis;L. L. Cogger

  • The configuration of the auroral distribution for interplanetary magnetic field Bz northward: 1. IMF Bx and By dependencies as observed by the Viking satellite

    R. D. Elphinstone;K. Jankowska;J. S. Murphree;L. L. Cogger

  • What is a global auroral substorm

    Unknown

  • Observations in the vicinity of substorm onset: Implications for the substorm process

    R. D. Elphinstone;D. J. Hearn;L. L. Cogger;J. S. Murphree

  • Simultaneous optical observations of transpolar arcs in the two polar caps

    J. D. Craven;J. S. Murphree;L. A. Frank;L. L. Cogger

  • Width and structure of mesoscale optical auroral arcs

    D. J. Knudsen;E. F. Donovan;L. L. Cogger;B. Jackel

  • Dynamical behaviour of the nighttime ionosphere at Arecibo

    Unknown

  • Characteristics of dayside 5577Å and 3914Å aurora

    L. L. Cogger;J. S. Murphree;S. Ismail;C. D. Anger

  • The instantaneous relationship between polar cap and oval auroras at times of northward interplanetary magnetic field

    Unknown

  • Two‐dimensional structure of auroral poleward boundary intensifications

    E. Zesta;E. Donovan;L. Lyons;G. Enno

  • Evidence for a correlation between Sun-aligned arcs and the interplanetary magnetic field direction

    Unknown

  • The double oval UV auroral distribution: 2. The most poleward arc system and the dynamics of the magnetotail

    R. D. Elphinstone;D. J. Hearn;L. L. Cogger;J. S. Murphree

  • Longitudinal structure in atomic oxygen concentrations observed with WINDII on UARS

    Gordon G. Shepherd;Gérard Thuillier;B. H. Solheim;S. Chandra

  • Mean neutral circulation in the winter polar F region

    T. L. Killeen;R. G. Roble;R. W. Smith;N. W. Spencer

  • Large‐scale high‐latitude dayside auroral emissions

    J. S. Murphree;R. D. Elphinstone;D. Hearn;L. L. Cogger

  • A Spatial Spectral Scanning Technique for the Fabry–Perot Spectrometer

    G. G. Shepherd;C. W. Lake;J. R. Miller;L. L. Cogger

  • Scientific results from the Viking ultraviolet imager: An introduction

    C. D. Anger;J. S. Murphree;A. Vallance Jones;R. A. King

Frequent Co-Authors

J. S. Murphree
J. S. Murphree University of Calgary
Eric Donovan
Eric Donovan University of Calgary
Gordon G. Shepherd
Gordon G. Shepherd York University
John W. Meriwether
John W. Meriwether Clemson University
Thomas A. Potemra
Thomas A. Potemra Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Shinichi Ohtani
Shinichi Ohtani Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Patrick T. Newell
Patrick T. Newell Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
John C. Samson
John C. Samson University of Alberta
E. J. Llewellyn
E. J. Llewellyn University of Saskatchewan
Howard J. Singer
Howard J. Singer National Weather Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, various online degree options can complement their studies and expand career opportunities. Many choose affordable and flexible options like a cheap online general studies degree to build a foundational knowledge base while managing costs.

If you're looking for programs with a manageable workload, exploring what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can provide insight into degrees that balance career prospects with academic intensity.

Specialized fields related to Environmental Sciences, such as geology, offer focused career paths through an online geology degree. This equips students with critical skills in earth sciences, relevant for environmental assessment and natural resource management.

Additionally, expertise in spatial data and technology is highly valuable, with top-tier programs in geographic information systems. Many opt for the best GIS programs to gain proficiency in mapping and spatial analysis, essential tools in environmental planning and conservation.

Best Scientists Citing L. L. Cogger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles