World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
6550
World Ranking
8072
National Ranking
14

Martin Saska publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Saska sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 209 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Martin Saska D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Saska sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Saska is affiliated with the Czech Technical University in Prague in Czech Republic. Their research spans key areas within Engineering and Computer Science, with particular focus on Aerospace Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Further subfields of study include Computer Networks and Communications, Control and Systems Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering.

The research conducted by Martin Saska covers a variety of topics, including:

  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • UAV Applications and Optimization
  • Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Guidance and Control Systems

Selected recent papers authored under Martin Saska's name include:

  • "A Robust UAV System for Operations in a Constrained Environment," 2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "Present and Future of SLAM in Extreme Environments: The DARPA SubT Challenge," 2023, IEEE Transactions on Robotics
  • "Large-Scale Exploration of Cave Environments by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," 2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "Marker-Less Micro Aerial Vehicle Detection and Localization Using Convolutional Neural Networks," 2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "Decentralized swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles for search and rescue operations without explicit communication," 2022, Autonomous Robots

Frequent publication venues where their work has appeared include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • 2022 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS)
  • Field Robotics
  • Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Martin Saska collaborates regularly with a number of co-authors. Frequent co-authors in their research network are:

  • Tomáš Báča
  • Vít Krátký
  • Matěj Petrlík
  • Giuseppe Silano
  • Pavel Petráček

Best Publications

  • A Practical Multirobot Localization System

    Tomáš Krajník;Matías Nitsche;Jan Faigl;Petr Vanĕk

  • System for deployment of groups of unmanned micro aerial vehicles in GPS-denied environments using onboard visual relative localization

    Martin Saska;Tomas Baca;Justin Thomas;Jan Chudoba

  • Robot Path Planning using Particle Swarm Optimization of Ferguson Splines

    Martin Saska;Martin Macas;Libor Preucil;Lenka Lhotska

  • Position and attitude control of multi-rotor aerial vehicles: A survey

    Tiago P. Nascimento;Martin Saska

  • Autonomous landing on a moving vehicle with an unmanned aerial vehicle

    Tomas Baca;Petr Stepan;Vojtech Spurny;Daniel Hert

  • Low-cost embedded system for relative localization in robotic swarms

    Jan Faigl;Tomas Krajnik;Jan Chudoba;Libor Preucil

  • Coordination and navigation of heterogeneous MAV-UGV formations localized by a 'hawk-eye'-like approach under a model predictive control scheme

    Martin Saska;Vojtĕch Vonásek;Tomáš Krajník;Libor Přeučil

  • Model Predictive Trajectory Tracking and Collision Avoidance for Reliable Outdoor Deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

    Tomas Baca;Daniel Hert;Giuseppe Loianno;Martin Saska

  • Swarm Distribution and Deployment for Cooperative Surveillance by Micro-Aerial Vehicles

    Martin Saska;Vojtĕch Vonásek;Jan Chudoba;Justin Thomas

  • Autonomous deployment of swarms of micro-aerial vehicles in cooperative surveillance

    Martin Saska;Jan Chudoba;Libor Precil;Justin Thomas

  • Swarms of micro aerial vehicles stabilized under a visual relative localization

    Martin Saska;Jan Vakula;Libor Preucil

  • Cooperative autonomous search, grasping, and delivering in a treasure hunt scenario by a team of unmanned aerial vehicles

    Vojtěch Spurný;Tomáš Báča;Martin Saska;Robert Pěnička

  • A Robust UAV System for Operations in a Constrained Environment

    Matej Petrlik;Tomas Baca;Daniel Hert;Matous Vrba

  • Dubins Orienteering Problem

    Robert Penicka;Jan Faigl;Petr Vana;Martin Saska

  • UVDAR System for Visual Relative Localization With Application to Leader–Follower Formations of Multirotor UAVs

    Viktor Walter;Nicolas Staub;Antonio Franchi;Martin Saska

  • DARPA Subterranean Challenge: Multi-robotic Exploration of Underground Environments

    Tomáš Rouček;Martin Pecka;Petr Čížek;Tomáš Petříček

  • Localization, Grasping, and Transportation of Magnetic Objects by a team of MAVs in Challenging Desert like Environments

    Giuseppe Loianno;Vojtech Spurny;Justin Thomas;Tomas Baca

  • The MRS UAV System: Pushing the Frontiers of Reproducible Research, Real-world Deployment, and Education with Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

    Tomas Baca;Matej Petrlik;Matous Vrba;Vojtech Spurny

  • Embedded model predictive control of unmanned micro aerial vehicles

    Tomas Baca;Giuseppe Loianno;Martin Saska

  • MAV-swarms: Unmanned aerial vehicles stabilized along a given path using onboard relative localization

    Martin Saska

  • Cooperative μUAV-UGV autonomous indoor surveillance

    Martin Saska;Tomas Krajnik;Libor Pfeucil

  • Coordination and navigation of heterogeneous UAVs-UGVs teams localized by a hawk-eye approach

    Martin Saska;Vojtech Vonasek;Tomas Krajnik;Libor Preucil

Frequent Co-Authors

Tomas Krajnik
Tomas Krajnik Czech Technical University in Prague
Giuseppe Loianno
Giuseppe Loianno New York University
Vijay Kumar
Vijay Kumar University of Pennsylvania
Dusan M. Stipanovic
Dusan M. Stipanovic University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Antonio Franchi
Antonio Franchi University of Twente
Anibal Ollero
Anibal Ollero University of Seville
Simon Lacroix
Simon Lacroix Laboratory for Analysis and Architecture of Systems
Tom Duckett
Tom Duckett University of Lincoln

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA often opens doors to a wide range of technical and interdisciplinary careers. Many related fields offer online degree options, giving you increased flexibility and access to specialized knowledge from anywhere in the world.

For students interested in sustainability and technology, options like an online environmental engineering degree can be a great fit. Others may be drawn to the practical applications and design thinking found in engineering, making the mechanical engineering degree online cost an important consideration when selecting the best program.

Interdisciplinary pathways also include advanced sciences. For example, an online physics degree provides valuable analytical and quantitative skills, preparing graduates for roles in technology, engineering, and research. Meanwhile, the technology sector’s focus on big data has elevated demand for professionals with a data scientist degree, blending computer science, analytics, and business strategy.

By considering these related online degrees, students can tailor their academic journey and unlock diverse, rewarding career pathways in the digital age.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Saska

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles